{"title":"Artificial intelligence and radiomics in small cell lung cancer: a narrative review of imaging and multisource data integration.","authors":"Yue Yang, Jialu Sun, Jiayi Liu, Jiaxu Liu, Shiyang Deng, Jiang Du","doi":"10.21037/jtd-2026-1693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics are increasingly used to analyze imaging and multisource data in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but the directness and clinical maturity of the available evidence remain uncertain. This narrative review aimed to summarize and critically evaluate SCLC-specific, mixed-cohort, and indirect evidence across diagnostic classification, prognostic prediction, treatment-associated outcomes, and lesion segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured literature search was conducted to identify human studies evaluating AI, deep learning (DL), radiomics, or machine learning within imaging-based or imaging-integrated workflows. Studies were selected according to clinical relevance, directness of SCLC evidence, methodological strength, and reporting completeness, and were classified as SCLC-specific, mixed-cohort, or indirect/transferable evidence.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>Direct SCLC-specific evidence was strongest for multicenter computed tomography (CT)-based prognostic models and lesion segmentation, whereas diagnostic classification relied mainly on mixed cohorts or public image-level datasets. Treatment-response models showed preliminary value but were predominantly retrospective and lacked prospective clinical validation. Retrospective studies suggested associations between model-derived risk scores and outcomes following prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), but did not establish treatment-benefit prediction. Pathomic and radiogenomic analyses also identified associations between quantitative features, immune-cell infiltration, genomic alterations, and treatment response; these findings remain hypothesis-generating. Interpretation is limited by small SCLC cohorts, retrospective single-center designs, non-independent image-level analyses, and limited external validation and interpretability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI and radiomics show potential in SCLC, particularly for CT-based prognosis and segmentation. However, treatment-response prediction, non-invasive subtype classification, and clinical decision support remain investigational and require prospective multicenter validation and patient-level external evaluation before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"18 9","pages":"1060"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13655832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2026-1693","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics are increasingly used to analyze imaging and multisource data in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but the directness and clinical maturity of the available evidence remain uncertain. This narrative review aimed to summarize and critically evaluate SCLC-specific, mixed-cohort, and indirect evidence across diagnostic classification, prognostic prediction, treatment-associated outcomes, and lesion segmentation.
Methods: A structured literature search was conducted to identify human studies evaluating AI, deep learning (DL), radiomics, or machine learning within imaging-based or imaging-integrated workflows. Studies were selected according to clinical relevance, directness of SCLC evidence, methodological strength, and reporting completeness, and were classified as SCLC-specific, mixed-cohort, or indirect/transferable evidence.
Key content and findings: Direct SCLC-specific evidence was strongest for multicenter computed tomography (CT)-based prognostic models and lesion segmentation, whereas diagnostic classification relied mainly on mixed cohorts or public image-level datasets. Treatment-response models showed preliminary value but were predominantly retrospective and lacked prospective clinical validation. Retrospective studies suggested associations between model-derived risk scores and outcomes following prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), but did not establish treatment-benefit prediction. Pathomic and radiogenomic analyses also identified associations between quantitative features, immune-cell infiltration, genomic alterations, and treatment response; these findings remain hypothesis-generating. Interpretation is limited by small SCLC cohorts, retrospective single-center designs, non-independent image-level analyses, and limited external validation and interpretability.
Conclusions: AI and radiomics show potential in SCLC, particularly for CT-based prognosis and segmentation. However, treatment-response prediction, non-invasive subtype classification, and clinical decision support remain investigational and require prospective multicenter validation and patient-level external evaluation before clinical implementation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.