Racial Differences in Respiratory Tract Infection Diagnosis and Antibiotic Prescriptions.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kathryn A Martinez, Ava Rezaee, Victoria Criswell, Michael B Rothberg
{"title":"Racial Differences in Respiratory Tract Infection Diagnosis and Antibiotic Prescriptions.","authors":"Kathryn A Martinez, Ava Rezaee, Victoria Criswell, Michael B Rothberg","doi":"10.1007/s11606-026-10930-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-White patients are less likely than White patients to be prescribed antibiotics for respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Our objective was to understand whether this could be explained by differences in RTI diagnosis type by race.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational cohort study of adults receiving urgent care at Cleveland Clinic in Northeast Ohio who were diagnosed with an RTI between 2016 and 2022. We used mixed effects logistic regression of antibiotic prescription by patient race (White versus non-White) in two models: 1) not accounting for RTI diagnosis type, and 2) accounting for diagnosis type. We used mixed effects logistic regression, including physician and individual patient as random effects, to assess differences in the odds of being diagnosed with sinusitis versus unspecified RTI by race. Finally, we assessed odds of being prescribed an antibiotic by race, stratified by diagnosis. Analyses were conducted at the visit level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 100,052 visits with 62,972 unique patients (median visits per patient was 1), 21% percent were for sinusitis and 30% were for unspecified RTI. Eighty-four percent of patients were White and 16% were non-White. In the model not controlling for diagnosis, compared to White patients, non-White patients were significantly less likely to be prescribed an antibiotic (aOR: 0.79; 95%CI:0.76-0.82). After adjusting for diagnosis, the association between non-White race and antibiotic prescription was weaker but still significant (aOR:0.91; 95%CI:0.87-0.95). Compared to White patients, non-White patients were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with sinusitis versus unspecified RTI (aOR:0.61; 95%CI:0.56-0.66). Non-White patients were significantly less likely to be prescribed antibiotics for sinusitis and unspecified RTI than White patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Racial differences in diagnosis of sinusitis partially explain lower rates of antibiotic prescription among non-White patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10930-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-White patients are less likely than White patients to be prescribed antibiotics for respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Our objective was to understand whether this could be explained by differences in RTI diagnosis type by race.

Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study of adults receiving urgent care at Cleveland Clinic in Northeast Ohio who were diagnosed with an RTI between 2016 and 2022. We used mixed effects logistic regression of antibiotic prescription by patient race (White versus non-White) in two models: 1) not accounting for RTI diagnosis type, and 2) accounting for diagnosis type. We used mixed effects logistic regression, including physician and individual patient as random effects, to assess differences in the odds of being diagnosed with sinusitis versus unspecified RTI by race. Finally, we assessed odds of being prescribed an antibiotic by race, stratified by diagnosis. Analyses were conducted at the visit level.

Results: Among 100,052 visits with 62,972 unique patients (median visits per patient was 1), 21% percent were for sinusitis and 30% were for unspecified RTI. Eighty-four percent of patients were White and 16% were non-White. In the model not controlling for diagnosis, compared to White patients, non-White patients were significantly less likely to be prescribed an antibiotic (aOR: 0.79; 95%CI:0.76-0.82). After adjusting for diagnosis, the association between non-White race and antibiotic prescription was weaker but still significant (aOR:0.91; 95%CI:0.87-0.95). Compared to White patients, non-White patients were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with sinusitis versus unspecified RTI (aOR:0.61; 95%CI:0.56-0.66). Non-White patients were significantly less likely to be prescribed antibiotics for sinusitis and unspecified RTI than White patients.

Conclusions: Racial differences in diagnosis of sinusitis partially explain lower rates of antibiotic prescription among non-White patients.

呼吸道感染诊断和抗生素处方的种族差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书