"Most of what I do is a workaround now": Clinician Use of Workarounds Following an EHR Transition.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sarah C Keithly, Christine Sulc, Ekaterina Cole, Ryan Sterling, Yung-Ling Lin, Emmi Obara, Sarah Shirley, Edwin S Wong, Seppo T Rinne, Jessica Young
{"title":"\"Most of what I do is a workaround now\": Clinician Use of Workarounds Following an EHR Transition.","authors":"Sarah C Keithly, Christine Sulc, Ekaterina Cole, Ryan Sterling, Yung-Ling Lin, Emmi Obara, Sarah Shirley, Edwin S Wong, Seppo T Rinne, Jessica Young","doi":"10.1007/s11606-026-10840-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is transitioning from a homegrown electronic health record (EHR) system to a single-vendor Federal EHR system, the largest EHR transition in history. Research shows that this transition was profoundly disruptive to care during the early implementation phase, yet limited data exist on clinician experience with and response to the transition in the years following implementation of the new system.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the use and perceptions of workarounds among VA clinicians using the new Federal EHR system.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive exploratory qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Using a mix of purposive and snowball sampling, we recruited direct care clinicians across a range of professions currently employed at the first five VA medical sites to transition to the new Federal EHR. Of the 104 clinicians invited, 30 (28.8%) participated in interviews.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians approximately 1.5 to 4 years post-go-live across sites. We performed a hybrid inductive-deductive content analysis using an approach that combined templated summaries with matrix analysis. KEY RESULTS: Workarounds emerged as highly salient to clinician experience with the new EHR. Analyses generated four themes relevant to EHR workarounds: (1) ongoing EHR-related challenges impeded clinicians' job performance; (2) workarounds emerged in response to continued EHR challenges; (3) workarounds were perceived as necessary but risky to patients, users, and the health care system; and (4) as EHR problems persisted, workarounds became routine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many of VA's EHR transition challenges have persisted beyond the initial implementation phase, contributing to a reliance on workarounds to overcome obstacles to care delivery. Workarounds were perceived as both beneficial and risky to users, patients, and the healthcare system. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the role and impact of workarounds during EHR-to-EHR transitions to inform system improvements and workflow optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10840-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is transitioning from a homegrown electronic health record (EHR) system to a single-vendor Federal EHR system, the largest EHR transition in history. Research shows that this transition was profoundly disruptive to care during the early implementation phase, yet limited data exist on clinician experience with and response to the transition in the years following implementation of the new system.

Objective: To investigate the use and perceptions of workarounds among VA clinicians using the new Federal EHR system.

Design: A descriptive exploratory qualitative study.

Participants: Using a mix of purposive and snowball sampling, we recruited direct care clinicians across a range of professions currently employed at the first five VA medical sites to transition to the new Federal EHR. Of the 104 clinicians invited, 30 (28.8%) participated in interviews.

Approach: We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians approximately 1.5 to 4 years post-go-live across sites. We performed a hybrid inductive-deductive content analysis using an approach that combined templated summaries with matrix analysis. KEY RESULTS: Workarounds emerged as highly salient to clinician experience with the new EHR. Analyses generated four themes relevant to EHR workarounds: (1) ongoing EHR-related challenges impeded clinicians' job performance; (2) workarounds emerged in response to continued EHR challenges; (3) workarounds were perceived as necessary but risky to patients, users, and the health care system; and (4) as EHR problems persisted, workarounds became routine.

Conclusions: Many of VA's EHR transition challenges have persisted beyond the initial implementation phase, contributing to a reliance on workarounds to overcome obstacles to care delivery. Workarounds were perceived as both beneficial and risky to users, patients, and the healthcare system. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the role and impact of workarounds during EHR-to-EHR transitions to inform system improvements and workflow optimization.

“我现在所做的大部分工作都是权宜之计”:EHR转型后临床医生使用权宜之计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书