Single-Stage Management of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: Outcomes of Laparoendoscopic Rendezvous and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration at Two Experienced Centers.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sergio Riveros, Grecia Artigas, Juan Andrés Díaz, Elizabeth Rivas, Esteban Ruiz, Ricardo Mejía, Erwin Buckel, Allan Sharp, Hugo Ritcher, Marcel Sanhueza, Fernando Pimentel, Fernando Crovari, Nicolás Quezada, Alejandro Brañes
{"title":"Single-Stage Management of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: Outcomes of Laparoendoscopic Rendezvous and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration at Two Experienced Centers.","authors":"Sergio Riveros, Grecia Artigas, Juan Andrés Díaz, Elizabeth Rivas, Esteban Ruiz, Ricardo Mejía, Erwin Buckel, Allan Sharp, Hugo Ritcher, Marcel Sanhueza, Fernando Pimentel, Fernando Crovari, Nicolás Quezada, Alejandro Brañes","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2026.102633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-stage management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis can be performed by laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV) or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). We describe outcomes at two experienced centers, each preferentially using one approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied patients treated between January 2016 and December 2023 at two tertiary centers. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were described by institutional approach. An exploratory subgroup analysis compared transcystic and transductal LCBDE with LERV. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for two groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test for three groups; categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 347 patients were included (LCBDE: 169; LERV: 178). LERV patients were older and had higher ASA classification (p < 0.001). Median operative time was 178minutes in LCBDE and 100.5minutes in LERV (p < 0.001). Ductal clearance exceeded 95% in both cohorts. Thirty-day morbidity was 10.7% and 11.2%, respectively (p = 0.862). Median postoperative length of stay was 1 and 2 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Because each center preferentially used one approach, differences in time and stay cannot be attributed to technique alone. Exploratory analysis of transcystic (n = 121) and transductal (n = 48) LCBDE alongside LERV (n = 178) showed differences in operative time and postoperative length of stay. These subgroups differed in anatomy and case complexity. Late biliary events were uncommon, but follow-up duration differed between centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both experienced centers achieved high ductal clearance and low postoperative morbidity using their established single-stage approach. Operative time and postoperative length of stay describe outcomes within each institutional practice; this design does not isolate the effect of either technique. Selection should consider biliary anatomy, stone characteristics, and team expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2026.102633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Single-stage management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis can be performed by laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV) or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). We describe outcomes at two experienced centers, each preferentially using one approach.

Methods: We retrospectively studied patients treated between January 2016 and December 2023 at two tertiary centers. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were described by institutional approach. An exploratory subgroup analysis compared transcystic and transductal LCBDE with LERV. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for two groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test for three groups; categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate.

Results: A total of 347 patients were included (LCBDE: 169; LERV: 178). LERV patients were older and had higher ASA classification (p < 0.001). Median operative time was 178minutes in LCBDE and 100.5minutes in LERV (p < 0.001). Ductal clearance exceeded 95% in both cohorts. Thirty-day morbidity was 10.7% and 11.2%, respectively (p = 0.862). Median postoperative length of stay was 1 and 2 days, respectively (p < 0.001). Because each center preferentially used one approach, differences in time and stay cannot be attributed to technique alone. Exploratory analysis of transcystic (n = 121) and transductal (n = 48) LCBDE alongside LERV (n = 178) showed differences in operative time and postoperative length of stay. These subgroups differed in anatomy and case complexity. Late biliary events were uncommon, but follow-up duration differed between centers.

Conclusions: Both experienced centers achieved high ductal clearance and low postoperative morbidity using their established single-stage approach. Operative time and postoperative length of stay describe outcomes within each institutional practice; this design does not isolate the effect of either technique. Selection should consider biliary anatomy, stone characteristics, and team expertise.

胆囊胆总管结石的单阶段治疗:在两个经验丰富的中心进行腹腔镜汇合和腹腔镜胆总管探查的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书