Three doors, three locks: a domain-specific framework for the residual door-to-balloon gap in STEMI care : Matters Arising, commentary on Krishnan et al., Int J Emerg Med 2026;19:113.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sajid Kadir, Travis Murphy
{"title":"Three doors, three locks: a domain-specific framework for the residual door-to-balloon gap in STEMI care : Matters Arising, commentary on Krishnan et al., Int J Emerg Med 2026;19:113.","authors":"Sajid Kadir, Travis Murphy","doi":"10.1186/s12245-026-01405-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Krishnan and colleagues report that 91% of STEMI patients at a large Indian tertiary centre received primary PCI within the 90-minute door-to-balloon (D2B) target, a meaningful achievement in contemporary STEMI care. Their analysis of the 9% who missed the target is equally valuable: delays distributed almost evenly across three categories, delayed informed consent, hemodynamic instability, and diagnostic ambiguity. We argue these categories are not interchangeable quality-improvement targets. They are mechanistically distinct problems requiring different solutions. We propose a conceptual, hypothesis-generating framework rather than a validated taxonomy. Future STEMI quality improvement efforts should categorize residual delays by domain rather than reporting them in aggregate, and should match interventions to the specific mechanism of delay.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-026-01405-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Krishnan and colleagues report that 91% of STEMI patients at a large Indian tertiary centre received primary PCI within the 90-minute door-to-balloon (D2B) target, a meaningful achievement in contemporary STEMI care. Their analysis of the 9% who missed the target is equally valuable: delays distributed almost evenly across three categories, delayed informed consent, hemodynamic instability, and diagnostic ambiguity. We argue these categories are not interchangeable quality-improvement targets. They are mechanistically distinct problems requiring different solutions. We propose a conceptual, hypothesis-generating framework rather than a validated taxonomy. Future STEMI quality improvement efforts should categorize residual delays by domain rather than reporting them in aggregate, and should match interventions to the specific mechanism of delay.

三扇门,三把锁:STEMI护理中残余门到气囊间隙的特定领域框架:出现的问题,评论Krishnan等人,《国际新兴医学杂志》2026;19:13 3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书