Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Non-Intensively Managed Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 4.9 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ayman Al Hayek, Wael M Al Zahrani, Haifa F Alotaibi, Manal El Jammal, Mohammed A Al Dawish
{"title":"Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Non-Intensively Managed Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ayman Al Hayek, Wael M Al Zahrani, Haifa F Alotaibi, Manal El Jammal, Mohammed A Al Dawish","doi":"10.1177/19322968261489265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) not receiving intensive insulin therapy remains incompletely established, particularly regarding glycemic metrics beyond glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating real-time CGM (rtCGM) or intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) in adults with T2D managed with non-intensive insulin regimens or non-insulin therapies. Databases were searched from inception to February 2026. Primary outcomes included HbA1c, mean glucose concentration, time in range (%TIR), time above range (%TAR), time below range (%TBR), body mass index (BMI), and patient-reported outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using Stata 17. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, version 2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five RCTs were included. Continuous glucose monitoring significantly reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.46 to -0.23), mean glucose concentration (MD -13.97 mg/dL, 95% CI, -23.13 to -4.81), and %TAR (MD -6.75%, 95% CI, -10.81 to -2.70), while significantly increasing %TIR (MD +7.85%, 95% CI, 4.32-11.38). No significant effects were observed for BMI (MD -0.16 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.12) or %TBR (MD -0.11%, 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.08). Benefits were generally more pronounced in non-insulin-treated populations. Patient-reported outcomes were heterogeneous but suggested improved treatment satisfaction and glucose-monitoring experience with CGM. Certainty of evidence was moderate across outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring probably improves glycemic control in adults with T2D not receiving intensive insulin therapy, particularly by reducing hyperglycemia and improving TIR, with limited effects on hypoglycemia or body weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968261489265"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13669254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968261489265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) not receiving intensive insulin therapy remains incompletely established, particularly regarding glycemic metrics beyond glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating real-time CGM (rtCGM) or intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) in adults with T2D managed with non-intensive insulin regimens or non-insulin therapies. Databases were searched from inception to February 2026. Primary outcomes included HbA1c, mean glucose concentration, time in range (%TIR), time above range (%TAR), time below range (%TBR), body mass index (BMI), and patient-reported outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using Stata 17. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, version 2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results: Twenty-five RCTs were included. Continuous glucose monitoring significantly reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.46 to -0.23), mean glucose concentration (MD -13.97 mg/dL, 95% CI, -23.13 to -4.81), and %TAR (MD -6.75%, 95% CI, -10.81 to -2.70), while significantly increasing %TIR (MD +7.85%, 95% CI, 4.32-11.38). No significant effects were observed for BMI (MD -0.16 kg/m2, 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.12) or %TBR (MD -0.11%, 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.08). Benefits were generally more pronounced in non-insulin-treated populations. Patient-reported outcomes were heterogeneous but suggested improved treatment satisfaction and glucose-monitoring experience with CGM. Certainty of evidence was moderate across outcomes.

Conclusions: Continuous glucose monitoring probably improves glycemic control in adults with T2D not receiving intensive insulin therapy, particularly by reducing hyperglycemia and improving TIR, with limited effects on hypoglycemia or body weight.

连续血糖监测在非强化管理的2型糖尿病中的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书