Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Non-Intensively Managed Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Ayman Al Hayek, Wael M Al Zahrani, Haifa F Alotaibi, Manal El Jammal, Mohammed A Al Dawish
{"title":"Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Non-Intensively Managed Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ayman Al Hayek, Wael M Al Zahrani, Haifa F Alotaibi, Manal El Jammal, Mohammed A Al Dawish","doi":"10.1177/19322968261489265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) not receiving intensive insulin therapy remains incompletely established, particularly regarding glycemic metrics beyond glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating real-time CGM (rtCGM) or intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) in adults with T2D managed with non-intensive insulin regimens or non-insulin therapies. Databases were searched from inception to February 2026. Primary outcomes included HbA1c, mean glucose concentration, time in range (%TIR), time above range (%TAR), time below range (%TBR), body mass index (BMI), and patient-reported outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using Stata 17. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, version 2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five RCTs were included. Continuous glucose monitoring significantly reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.46 to -0.23), mean glucose concentration (MD -13.97 mg/dL, 95% CI, -23.13 to -4.81), and %TAR (MD -6.75%, 95% CI, -10.81 to -2.70), while significantly increasing %TIR (MD +7.85%, 95% CI, 4.32-11.38). No significant effects were observed for BMI (MD -0.16 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.12) or %TBR (MD -0.11%, 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.08). Benefits were generally more pronounced in non-insulin-treated populations. Patient-reported outcomes were heterogeneous but suggested improved treatment satisfaction and glucose-monitoring experience with CGM. Certainty of evidence was moderate across outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring probably improves glycemic control in adults with T2D not receiving intensive insulin therapy, particularly by reducing hyperglycemia and improving TIR, with limited effects on hypoglycemia or body weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968261489265"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13669254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968261489265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) not receiving intensive insulin therapy remains incompletely established, particularly regarding glycemic metrics beyond glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating real-time CGM (rtCGM) or intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) in adults with T2D managed with non-intensive insulin regimens or non-insulin therapies. Databases were searched from inception to February 2026. Primary outcomes included HbA1c, mean glucose concentration, time in range (%TIR), time above range (%TAR), time below range (%TBR), body mass index (BMI), and patient-reported outcomes. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using Stata 17. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, version 2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
Results: Twenty-five RCTs were included. Continuous glucose monitoring significantly reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.46 to -0.23), mean glucose concentration (MD -13.97 mg/dL, 95% CI, -23.13 to -4.81), and %TAR (MD -6.75%, 95% CI, -10.81 to -2.70), while significantly increasing %TIR (MD +7.85%, 95% CI, 4.32-11.38). No significant effects were observed for BMI (MD -0.16 kg/m2, 95% CI, -0.45 to 0.12) or %TBR (MD -0.11%, 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.08). Benefits were generally more pronounced in non-insulin-treated populations. Patient-reported outcomes were heterogeneous but suggested improved treatment satisfaction and glucose-monitoring experience with CGM. Certainty of evidence was moderate across outcomes.
Conclusions: Continuous glucose monitoring probably improves glycemic control in adults with T2D not receiving intensive insulin therapy, particularly by reducing hyperglycemia and improving TIR, with limited effects on hypoglycemia or body weight.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.