Comparison of Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and Peradeniya Organophosphorus Poisoning Scale in predicting clinical outcomes and mortality in organophosphorus poisoning.
Geo George Thomas, Santosh Kumar Chandaka, S Raghavendra Goud, Shehana Punnilath Salim, Premchand Bangaru, Vignan Kappagantu
{"title":"Comparison of Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and Peradeniya Organophosphorus Poisoning Scale in predicting clinical outcomes and mortality in organophosphorus poisoning.","authors":"Geo George Thomas, Santosh Kumar Chandaka, S Raghavendra Goud, Shehana Punnilath Salim, Premchand Bangaru, Vignan Kappagantu","doi":"10.1186/s12245-026-01397-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Organophosphorus poisoning is a major health hazard in developing countries. We conducted a study to compare the Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system and Peradeniya Organophosphorus Poisoning Scale in predicting the complications, ventilator requirement and mortality in patients of Acute Organophosphorus Poisoning.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective observational study was done on 100 patients above 18 years of age, presenting with alleged history of consumption of organophosphorus compounds. The patients were evaluated for the required details to calculate the APACHE II score and Peradeniya Organophosphorus Poisoning Scale and were followed up till discharge or mortality to identify the complications, ventilator requirement and mortality. This data was tabulated using Excel and analyzed using SPSS software to look for correlation between the scores and the outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of our patients was 33.64 ± 12.99 years. The APACHE II cutoff score for complications, ventilator requirement and mortality was ≥ 7 (sensitivity 94.3%, specificity 96.9%, Area under Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) 0.99, p < 0.01), ≥9 (sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 82.4%, Area under ROC 0.91, p < 0.01) and ≥16 (sensitivity 85.7, specificity 96.8%, Area under ROC 0.98, p < 0.01) respectively. Similarly, the Peradeniya Organophosphorus Poisoning Scale cutoff was for complications, ventilator requirement and mortality was ≥ 3 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 92.3%, Area under ROC 0.90, p < 0.01), ≥3 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 75.3%, Area under ROC 0.85, p < 0.01) and ≥7 (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 97.8%, Area under ROC 0.99, p < 0.01) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both APACHE II and POPS demonstrated good predictive performance for adverse outcomes in acute organophosphorus poisoning. Both scores showed excellent discrimination for mortality, with no statistically significant difference between their AUCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13663191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-026-01397-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Organophosphorus poisoning is a major health hazard in developing countries. We conducted a study to compare the Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system and Peradeniya Organophosphorus Poisoning Scale in predicting the complications, ventilator requirement and mortality in patients of Acute Organophosphorus Poisoning.
Methodology: A prospective observational study was done on 100 patients above 18 years of age, presenting with alleged history of consumption of organophosphorus compounds. The patients were evaluated for the required details to calculate the APACHE II score and Peradeniya Organophosphorus Poisoning Scale and were followed up till discharge or mortality to identify the complications, ventilator requirement and mortality. This data was tabulated using Excel and analyzed using SPSS software to look for correlation between the scores and the outcome.
Results: The mean age of our patients was 33.64 ± 12.99 years. The APACHE II cutoff score for complications, ventilator requirement and mortality was ≥ 7 (sensitivity 94.3%, specificity 96.9%, Area under Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) 0.99, p < 0.01), ≥9 (sensitivity 86.7%, specificity 82.4%, Area under ROC 0.91, p < 0.01) and ≥16 (sensitivity 85.7, specificity 96.8%, Area under ROC 0.98, p < 0.01) respectively. Similarly, the Peradeniya Organophosphorus Poisoning Scale cutoff was for complications, ventilator requirement and mortality was ≥ 3 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 92.3%, Area under ROC 0.90, p < 0.01), ≥3 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 75.3%, Area under ROC 0.85, p < 0.01) and ≥7 (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 97.8%, Area under ROC 0.99, p < 0.01) respectively.
Conclusion: Both APACHE II and POPS demonstrated good predictive performance for adverse outcomes in acute organophosphorus poisoning. Both scores showed excellent discrimination for mortality, with no statistically significant difference between their AUCs.
背景:有机磷中毒是发展中国家的主要健康危害。我们进行了一项研究,比较急性生理、年龄和慢性健康评估II (Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation II, APACHE II)评分系统和Peradeniya有机磷中毒量表对急性有机磷中毒患者并发症、呼吸机需求和死亡率的预测。方法:一项前瞻性观察研究对100名18岁以上的患者进行了研究,这些患者都有食用有机磷化合物的病史。评估患者计算APACHE II评分和Peradeniya有机磷中毒量表所需的细节,并随访至出院或死亡,以确定并发症、呼吸机需求和死亡率。使用Excel将数据制成表格,并使用SPSS软件进行分析,以寻找得分与结果之间的相关性。结果:患者平均年龄33.64±12.99岁。并发症、呼吸机需求和死亡率的APACHE II截止评分≥7(敏感性94.3%,特异性96.9%,ROC下面积0.99,p)。结论:APACHE II和POPS对急性有机磷中毒的不良结局具有良好的预测效果。两个分数对死亡率都有很好的区分,它们的auc之间没有统计学上的显著差异。
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.