Optimizing AI-assisted decision-making in mammography screening: focusing on uncertainties.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nasrin Ahmadinejad, Nahid Sadighi, Rassa Ghavami Modegh, Mehran Arab Ahmadi, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Alireza Dizaji, Amin Rezaee, Maryam Rahmani, Arvin Arian, Fahimeh Zeinalkhani, Salome Maghsudlu, Saeedeh Shokri, Niloofar Pashaeifakhri, Hossein Ghanaati, Ali Sefidmouy, Mahdi Ghaznavi, Hamed Dashti, Hamid R Rabiee, Masoumeh Gity
{"title":"Optimizing AI-assisted decision-making in mammography screening: focusing on uncertainties.","authors":"Nasrin Ahmadinejad, Nahid Sadighi, Rassa Ghavami Modegh, Mehran Arab Ahmadi, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Alireza Dizaji, Amin Rezaee, Maryam Rahmani, Arvin Arian, Fahimeh Zeinalkhani, Salome Maghsudlu, Saeedeh Shokri, Niloofar Pashaeifakhri, Hossein Ghanaati, Ali Sefidmouy, Mahdi Ghaznavi, Hamed Dashti, Hamid R Rabiee, Masoumeh Gity","doi":"10.1186/s13244-026-02411-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate an AI-based decision-support system for mammography interpretation, assessing its impact on diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 130,838 mammograms from 35,709 patients with confirmed follow-up outcomes across multiple centers, using the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) for external validation. Representing one of the largest datasets from the Middle East, it evaluates model generalizability in underrepresented populations. An AI super-model incorporated separate UNet-based networks for lesion segmentation, a high-resolution model (4096) for calcifications, a multi-resolution ensemble (4096, 2048, 1024) for macro-scale lesions, and a risk-assessment model for malignancy prediction. Radiologists interpreted images under five scenarios: unaided, AI-assisted, AI as the final decision-maker in uncertain cases, union of radiologist and AI decisions in uncertain cases, and standalone AI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI assistance significantly enhanced performance across all scenarios. Based on aggregated reader performance, AUC improved from 83.04% (95% CI: 79.8-86.3) unaided to 88.40% (95% CI: 85.6-91.2) in the union scenario (p < 0.001). Sensitivity increased from 54.8% (95% CI: 48.6-61.0) to 83.9% (95% CI: 79.3-88.4) (p < 0.001), and specificity rose from 83.6% (95% CI: 82.0-85.3) to 91.1% (95% CI: 89.8-92.4) (p < 0.001). Multi-resolution segmentation effectively detected calcifications and challenging lesions. DDSM validation confirmed model robustness. AI showed particular promise in aiding less-experienced radiologists in underserved areas to improve early cancer detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI in mammography interpretation improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces uncertainty, supporting early breast cancer detection and optimized screening workflows.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Can an AI-based decision-support system improve the accuracy of mammography interpretation, reduce diagnostic uncertainty, and support less-experienced radiologists? Findings In this retrospective multicenter study, AI-assisted mammography improved sensitivity and specificity, increased cancer detection, and reduced recalls and false positives. Critical relevance statement AI integration in mammography enhances diagnostic accuracy, reduces unnecessary recalls, and supports more confident and efficient clinical decision-making, particularly by improving the performance of less-experienced radiologists in underserved and resource-limited settings where expert interpretation may be limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02411-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate an AI-based decision-support system for mammography interpretation, assessing its impact on diagnostic performance.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 130,838 mammograms from 35,709 patients with confirmed follow-up outcomes across multiple centers, using the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) for external validation. Representing one of the largest datasets from the Middle East, it evaluates model generalizability in underrepresented populations. An AI super-model incorporated separate UNet-based networks for lesion segmentation, a high-resolution model (4096) for calcifications, a multi-resolution ensemble (4096, 2048, 1024) for macro-scale lesions, and a risk-assessment model for malignancy prediction. Radiologists interpreted images under five scenarios: unaided, AI-assisted, AI as the final decision-maker in uncertain cases, union of radiologist and AI decisions in uncertain cases, and standalone AI.

Results: AI assistance significantly enhanced performance across all scenarios. Based on aggregated reader performance, AUC improved from 83.04% (95% CI: 79.8-86.3) unaided to 88.40% (95% CI: 85.6-91.2) in the union scenario (p < 0.001). Sensitivity increased from 54.8% (95% CI: 48.6-61.0) to 83.9% (95% CI: 79.3-88.4) (p < 0.001), and specificity rose from 83.6% (95% CI: 82.0-85.3) to 91.1% (95% CI: 89.8-92.4) (p < 0.001). Multi-resolution segmentation effectively detected calcifications and challenging lesions. DDSM validation confirmed model robustness. AI showed particular promise in aiding less-experienced radiologists in underserved areas to improve early cancer detection.

Conclusions: AI in mammography interpretation improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces uncertainty, supporting early breast cancer detection and optimized screening workflows.

Key points: Question Can an AI-based decision-support system improve the accuracy of mammography interpretation, reduce diagnostic uncertainty, and support less-experienced radiologists? Findings In this retrospective multicenter study, AI-assisted mammography improved sensitivity and specificity, increased cancer detection, and reduced recalls and false positives. Critical relevance statement AI integration in mammography enhances diagnostic accuracy, reduces unnecessary recalls, and supports more confident and efficient clinical decision-making, particularly by improving the performance of less-experienced radiologists in underserved and resource-limited settings where expert interpretation may be limited.

优化乳房x光筛查人工智能辅助决策:关注不确定性。
目的:评价一种基于人工智能的乳腺x线摄影判读决策支持系统,评估其对诊断效能的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性研究分析了来自35,709名患者的130,838张乳房x光片,这些患者在多个中心确认了随访结果,使用乳腺x光筛查数字数据库(DDSM)进行外部验证。它代表了中东地区最大的数据集之一,评估了模型在代表性不足的人群中的普遍性。人工智能超级模型结合了单独的基于unet的网络,用于病变分割,用于钙化的高分辨率模型(4096),用于宏观病变的多分辨率集合(4096,2048,1024),以及用于恶性肿瘤预测的风险评估模型。放射科医生在五种场景下解读图像:无辅助、人工智能辅助、不确定情况下人工智能作为最终决策者、不确定情况下放射科医生和人工智能联合决策、人工智能独立。结果:人工智能辅助显著提高了所有场景的性能。基于聚合阅读器的性能,在联合方案中,AUC从无辅助的83.04% (95% CI: 798 -86.3)提高到88.40% (95% CI: 85.6-91.2)。(p)结论:人工智能在乳房x线摄影解释中提高了诊断准确性,减少了不确定性,支持早期乳腺癌检测和优化筛查工作流程。基于人工智能的决策支持系统能否提高乳房x光检查解释的准确性,减少诊断的不确定性,并为经验不足的放射科医生提供支持?在这项回顾性多中心研究中,人工智能辅助乳房x光检查提高了敏感性和特异性,增加了癌症检测,减少了召回和假阳性。人工智能在乳房x光检查中的集成提高了诊断准确性,减少了不必要的召回,并支持更自信和有效的临床决策,特别是在服务不足和资源有限的环境中,通过提高经验不足的放射科医生的表现,专家解释可能受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书