{"title":"Clinical Characteristics of Coexistent Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and BCR::ABL1 Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Yanan Cai, Zefeng Xu, Shiqiang Qu, Lijuan Pan, Qingyan Gao, Meng Jiao, Songyang Zhao, Fuhui Li, Ningning Liu, Zunmin Zhu, Bing Li, Zhijian Xiao, Tiejun Qin","doi":"10.1002/hon.70273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Coexistent chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and <i>BCR::ABL1</i>-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are rare. We aimed to evaluate their clinical and therapeutic profiles. We retrospectively evaluated 36 institutional patients with coexistent CML and <i>BCR::ABL1</i>-negative MPN (Cohort A) and systematically reviewed 244 published cases (Cohort B). Patients were categorized by diagnostic sequence: prior CML, prior <i>BCR::ABL1</i>-negative MPN, or concurrent presentation. <i>BCR::ABL1</i> p210 and <i>JAK2V617 F</i> aberrations predominantly co-occurred. Diagnoses in Cohort A were mostly concurrent (77.8%), whereas Cohort B predominantly featured prior <i>BCR::ABL1</i>-negative MPN (43.0%), followed by concurrent diagnoses (35.7%) and prior CML (21.3%). In Cohort B, myelofibrosis was significantly more prevalent in prior <i>BCR::ABL1</i>-negative MPN compared to those with prior CML or concurrent diagnoses (56.2% vs. 26.9% vs. 35.6%, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.007). Persistent, unexplained cytosis despite active therapy triggered secondary mutation cross-screening in both cohorts. In Cohort A, exploratory survival analysis suggested a potential trend toward shorter overall survival in prior <i>BCR::ABL1</i>-negative MPN compared to concurrent diagnoses (90.5 months vs. not reached, <i>p</i> = 0.032). Multivariable analysis of Cohort B identified prior <i>BCR::ABL1</i>-negative MPN as an independent adverse predictor for major or deeper molecular responses (OR = 0.412, 95% CI: 0.197–0.861, <i>p</i> = 0.018), while tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapy was favorable (OR = 9.74, 95% CI: 1.108–85.636, <i>p</i> = 0.040). Addition of JAK2 inhibitors to TKI therapy did not significantly improve molecular responses over TKI monotherapy (67.1% vs. 54.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.193). To summarize, prior <i>BCR::ABL1</i>-negative MPN, the most frequent presentation, predicted inferior molecular responses. Clinicians should screen for coexistent mutations if cytosis persisted despite treatment. TKI remained the therapeutic cornerstone, as combined JAK2 inhibition demonstrated limited additional benefit.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"44 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Coexistent chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are rare. We aimed to evaluate their clinical and therapeutic profiles. We retrospectively evaluated 36 institutional patients with coexistent CML and BCR::ABL1-negative MPN (Cohort A) and systematically reviewed 244 published cases (Cohort B). Patients were categorized by diagnostic sequence: prior CML, prior BCR::ABL1-negative MPN, or concurrent presentation. BCR::ABL1 p210 and JAK2V617 F aberrations predominantly co-occurred. Diagnoses in Cohort A were mostly concurrent (77.8%), whereas Cohort B predominantly featured prior BCR::ABL1-negative MPN (43.0%), followed by concurrent diagnoses (35.7%) and prior CML (21.3%). In Cohort B, myelofibrosis was significantly more prevalent in prior BCR::ABL1-negative MPN compared to those with prior CML or concurrent diagnoses (56.2% vs. 26.9% vs. 35.6%, respectively; p = 0.007). Persistent, unexplained cytosis despite active therapy triggered secondary mutation cross-screening in both cohorts. In Cohort A, exploratory survival analysis suggested a potential trend toward shorter overall survival in prior BCR::ABL1-negative MPN compared to concurrent diagnoses (90.5 months vs. not reached, p = 0.032). Multivariable analysis of Cohort B identified prior BCR::ABL1-negative MPN as an independent adverse predictor for major or deeper molecular responses (OR = 0.412, 95% CI: 0.197–0.861, p = 0.018), while tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapy was favorable (OR = 9.74, 95% CI: 1.108–85.636, p = 0.040). Addition of JAK2 inhibitors to TKI therapy did not significantly improve molecular responses over TKI monotherapy (67.1% vs. 54.8%, p = 0.193). To summarize, prior BCR::ABL1-negative MPN, the most frequent presentation, predicted inferior molecular responses. Clinicians should screen for coexistent mutations if cytosis persisted despite treatment. TKI remained the therapeutic cornerstone, as combined JAK2 inhibition demonstrated limited additional benefit.
期刊介绍:
Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged:
-Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders
-Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays
-Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases
-Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies
-Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems.
Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.