Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography: A Critical Review of Models, Validation, and Clinical Impact.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Shunkai Xiao, Xianqiang Yang, Jing Chi
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography: A Critical Review of Models, Validation, and Clinical Impact.","authors":"Shunkai Xiao, Xianqiang Yang, Jing Chi","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2026.3743686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To critically review artificial intelligence (AI) in echocardiography, linking model design and technical performance to validation and clinical use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We synthesized literature assembled through Web of Science and Scopus collections and targeted revision searches. Evidence was organized by echocardiographic task, model paradigm, data source, evaluation protocol, and level of clinical validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI applications span acquisition guidance, image analysis, quantitative measurement, disease assessment, and outcome prediction, with emerging foundation, multimodal, and examination-level models. Most studies assess retrospective task performance; fewer evaluate cross-site transportability or clinical impact. Reproducible performance has been demonstrated for view recognition, segmentation, and selected measurements under aligned protocols, and prospective trials confirm workflow gains. However, evidence linking AI to improved clinical decisions or patient outcomes remains limited. Generalizability is further constrained by uneven dataset coverage and inconsistent evaluation protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence supports AI assistance in selected echocardiographic tasks; however, clinical use requires external validation, failure reporting, and ongoing monitoring in intended settings.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This review links model development with validation evidence to guide clinical evaluation and identify priorities for prospective studies in echocardiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2026.3743686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To critically review artificial intelligence (AI) in echocardiography, linking model design and technical performance to validation and clinical use.

Methods: We synthesized literature assembled through Web of Science and Scopus collections and targeted revision searches. Evidence was organized by echocardiographic task, model paradigm, data source, evaluation protocol, and level of clinical validation.

Results: AI applications span acquisition guidance, image analysis, quantitative measurement, disease assessment, and outcome prediction, with emerging foundation, multimodal, and examination-level models. Most studies assess retrospective task performance; fewer evaluate cross-site transportability or clinical impact. Reproducible performance has been demonstrated for view recognition, segmentation, and selected measurements under aligned protocols, and prospective trials confirm workflow gains. However, evidence linking AI to improved clinical decisions or patient outcomes remains limited. Generalizability is further constrained by uneven dataset coverage and inconsistent evaluation protocols.

Conclusion: Current evidence supports AI assistance in selected echocardiographic tasks; however, clinical use requires external validation, failure reporting, and ongoing monitoring in intended settings.

Significance: This review links model development with validation evidence to guide clinical evaluation and identify priorities for prospective studies in echocardiography.

超声心动图中的人工智能:对模型、验证和临床影响的重要回顾。
目的:回顾超声心动图中的人工智能(AI),将模型设计和技术性能与验证和临床应用联系起来。方法通过Web of Science和Scopus收集文献并进行有针对性的修订检索。证据按超声心动图任务、模型范式、数据来源、评价方案和临床验证水平进行组织。结果:人工智能的应用涵盖了采集指导、图像分析、定量测量、疾病评估和结局预测,并出现了基础模型、多模态模型和考试级模型。大多数研究评估回顾性任务表现;较少评估跨部位转运性或临床影响。在一致的协议下,在视图识别、分割和选择测量方面已经证明了可重复的性能,并且前瞻性试验证实了工作流的收益。然而,将人工智能与改善临床决策或患者预后联系起来的证据仍然有限。不均匀的数据集覆盖和不一致的评估协议进一步限制了泛化性。结论:目前的证据支持人工智能在某些超声心动图任务中的辅助作用;然而,临床使用需要外部验证、失败报告和在预期环境下的持续监测。意义:本综述将模型开发与验证证据联系起来,以指导临床评估并确定超声心动图前瞻性研究的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
880
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书