Cross-cohort DNA methylation analysis shows CpG island promoter hypermethylation features associated with cervical lesion grade.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Yushan Xia, Jie Wang, Liyan Duan, Ya Li, Guangming Li, Yu Wang, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Cross-cohort DNA methylation analysis shows CpG island promoter hypermethylation features associated with cervical lesion grade.","authors":"Yushan Xia, Jie Wang, Liyan Duan, Ya Li, Guangming Li, Yu Wang, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1080/17501911.2026.2746945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical lesion progression is accompanied by epigenomic alterations, but reproducible methylation features across public cohorts require cautious re-analysis.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of public Illumina 450K methylation cohorts: GSE46306 as discovery (20 normal, 17 CIN3, six carcinoma), GSE99511 and GSE186835 as validation, and TCGA-CESC tumors for methylation-RNA expression association. Shared autosomal CpGs were screened for monotonic grade-associated change, cross-cohort directional consistency, promoter annotation, regional aggregation, sample-level score performance, and tumor expression correlation. No intervention, dose, treatment regimen, blinding, or safety outcome was involved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 340, 248 shared autosomal CpGs, 3, 008 met robust cross-cohort criteria, including 2, 991 hypermethylated and 17 hypomethylated sites. Robust sites mapped to 628 promoter genes and 660 multi-CpG DMR-like regions. A fixed 200-CpG score yielded AUCs of 0.733-0.963 for CIN3 or worse versus controls and 0.971-0.988 for cancer versus non-cancer. In TCGA-CESC, 394 of 610 detectable robust promoter genes showed significant negative methylation-expression correlations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reanalysis supports reproducible CpG island and promoter hypermethylation features associated with cervical lesion grade, but processed data, cohort heterogeneity, cross-sectional tumor associations, and absence of prospective validation limit interpretation to candidate atlas generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11959,"journal":{"name":"Epigenomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17501911.2026.2746945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical lesion progression is accompanied by epigenomic alterations, but reproducible methylation features across public cohorts require cautious re-analysis.

Study design and methods: We performed a secondary analysis of public Illumina 450K methylation cohorts: GSE46306 as discovery (20 normal, 17 CIN3, six carcinoma), GSE99511 and GSE186835 as validation, and TCGA-CESC tumors for methylation-RNA expression association. Shared autosomal CpGs were screened for monotonic grade-associated change, cross-cohort directional consistency, promoter annotation, regional aggregation, sample-level score performance, and tumor expression correlation. No intervention, dose, treatment regimen, blinding, or safety outcome was involved.

Results: Among 340, 248 shared autosomal CpGs, 3, 008 met robust cross-cohort criteria, including 2, 991 hypermethylated and 17 hypomethylated sites. Robust sites mapped to 628 promoter genes and 660 multi-CpG DMR-like regions. A fixed 200-CpG score yielded AUCs of 0.733-0.963 for CIN3 or worse versus controls and 0.971-0.988 for cancer versus non-cancer. In TCGA-CESC, 394 of 610 detectable robust promoter genes showed significant negative methylation-expression correlations.

Conclusions: The reanalysis supports reproducible CpG island and promoter hypermethylation features associated with cervical lesion grade, but processed data, cohort heterogeneity, cross-sectional tumor associations, and absence of prospective validation limit interpretation to candidate atlas generation.

跨队列DNA甲基化分析显示CpG岛启动子高甲基化特征与宫颈病变等级相关。
背景:宫颈病变进展伴随着表观基因组改变,但在公共队列中可重复的甲基化特征需要谨慎的重新分析。研究设计和方法:我们对公开的Illumina 450K甲基化队列进行了二次分析:GSE46306作为发现(20例正常,17例CIN3, 6例癌),GSE99511和GSE186835作为验证,以及TCGA-CESC肿瘤的甲基化- rna表达关联。筛选共享常染色体CpGs的单调等级相关变化、跨队列定向一致性、启动子注释、区域聚集、样本水平评分表现和肿瘤表达相关性。不涉及干预、剂量、治疗方案、盲法或安全性结果。结果:在340,248个共享常染色体CpGs中,3,008个符合强大的跨队列标准,包括2,991个高甲基化位点和17个低甲基化位点。稳健位点映射到628个启动子基因和660个多cpg dmr样区域。固定的200-CpG评分显示,CIN3或更差的患者与对照组的auc为0.733-0.963,癌与非癌的auc为0.971-0.988。在TCGA-CESC中,610个可检测到的健壮启动子基因中有394个显示出显著的负甲基化表达相关性。结论:该再分析支持可重复的CpG岛和启动子超甲基化特征与宫颈病变等级相关,但经过处理的数据、队列异质性、横断面肿瘤关联以及缺乏前瞻性验证限制了对候选图谱生成的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epigenomics
Epigenomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epigenomics provides the forum to address the rapidly progressing research developments in this ever-expanding field; to report on the major challenges ahead and critical advances that are propelling the science forward. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats – invaluable to a time constrained community. Substantial developments in our current knowledge and understanding of genomics and epigenetics are constantly being made, yet this field is still in its infancy. Epigenomics provides a critical overview of the latest and most significant advances as they unfold and explores their potential application in the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书