Yushan Xia, Jie Wang, Liyan Duan, Ya Li, Guangming Li, Yu Wang, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Cross-cohort DNA methylation analysis shows CpG island promoter hypermethylation features associated with cervical lesion grade.","authors":"Yushan Xia, Jie Wang, Liyan Duan, Ya Li, Guangming Li, Yu Wang, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1080/17501911.2026.2746945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical lesion progression is accompanied by epigenomic alterations, but reproducible methylation features across public cohorts require cautious re-analysis.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis of public Illumina 450K methylation cohorts: GSE46306 as discovery (20 normal, 17 CIN3, six carcinoma), GSE99511 and GSE186835 as validation, and TCGA-CESC tumors for methylation-RNA expression association. Shared autosomal CpGs were screened for monotonic grade-associated change, cross-cohort directional consistency, promoter annotation, regional aggregation, sample-level score performance, and tumor expression correlation. No intervention, dose, treatment regimen, blinding, or safety outcome was involved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 340, 248 shared autosomal CpGs, 3, 008 met robust cross-cohort criteria, including 2, 991 hypermethylated and 17 hypomethylated sites. Robust sites mapped to 628 promoter genes and 660 multi-CpG DMR-like regions. A fixed 200-CpG score yielded AUCs of 0.733-0.963 for CIN3 or worse versus controls and 0.971-0.988 for cancer versus non-cancer. In TCGA-CESC, 394 of 610 detectable robust promoter genes showed significant negative methylation-expression correlations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reanalysis supports reproducible CpG island and promoter hypermethylation features associated with cervical lesion grade, but processed data, cohort heterogeneity, cross-sectional tumor associations, and absence of prospective validation limit interpretation to candidate atlas generation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11959,"journal":{"name":"Epigenomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epigenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17501911.2026.2746945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cervical lesion progression is accompanied by epigenomic alterations, but reproducible methylation features across public cohorts require cautious re-analysis.
Study design and methods: We performed a secondary analysis of public Illumina 450K methylation cohorts: GSE46306 as discovery (20 normal, 17 CIN3, six carcinoma), GSE99511 and GSE186835 as validation, and TCGA-CESC tumors for methylation-RNA expression association. Shared autosomal CpGs were screened for monotonic grade-associated change, cross-cohort directional consistency, promoter annotation, regional aggregation, sample-level score performance, and tumor expression correlation. No intervention, dose, treatment regimen, blinding, or safety outcome was involved.
Results: Among 340, 248 shared autosomal CpGs, 3, 008 met robust cross-cohort criteria, including 2, 991 hypermethylated and 17 hypomethylated sites. Robust sites mapped to 628 promoter genes and 660 multi-CpG DMR-like regions. A fixed 200-CpG score yielded AUCs of 0.733-0.963 for CIN3 or worse versus controls and 0.971-0.988 for cancer versus non-cancer. In TCGA-CESC, 394 of 610 detectable robust promoter genes showed significant negative methylation-expression correlations.
Conclusions: The reanalysis supports reproducible CpG island and promoter hypermethylation features associated with cervical lesion grade, but processed data, cohort heterogeneity, cross-sectional tumor associations, and absence of prospective validation limit interpretation to candidate atlas generation.
期刊介绍:
Epigenomics provides the forum to address the rapidly progressing research developments in this ever-expanding field; to report on the major challenges ahead and critical advances that are propelling the science forward. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats – invaluable to a time constrained community.
Substantial developments in our current knowledge and understanding of genomics and epigenetics are constantly being made, yet this field is still in its infancy. Epigenomics provides a critical overview of the latest and most significant advances as they unfold and explores their potential application in the clinical setting.