Interstitial lung disease as the initial manifestation of systemic autoimmune disease: a narrative review of autoantibodies, biomarkers, prognosis, and management.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Haralampos M Moutsopoulos
{"title":"Interstitial lung disease as the initial manifestation of systemic autoimmune disease: a narrative review of autoantibodies, biomarkers, prognosis, and management.","authors":"Haralampos M Moutsopoulos","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/objsua","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) may be the first or only clinically apparent manifestation of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD), preceding extrapulmonary features by months or years. The European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society research classification of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) provides a framework for patients with interstitial pneumonia and autoimmune features who do not meet criteria for a defined SARD. Importantly, IPAF requires features from at least two of three domains - clinical, serologic, and morphologic - and cannot be assigned on autoantibody positivity alone. Extended, phenotype-directed autoantibody testing can reveal lung-dominant anti-synthetase syndrome, clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis, early systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or Sjögren's syndrome (Autoimmune epithelitis). Prognosis is heterogeneous and is driven more consistently by the fibrotic burden, usual interstitial pneumonia pattern, baseline and longitudinal pulmonary physiology, and comorbidities than by the IPAF label itself. KL-6, surfactant protein D, CCL18, MMP-7, and multiplex proteomic signatures are promising biomarkers, but none is sufficiently validated to replace serial high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function testing. Management should be individualised through multidisciplinary discussion. Immunomodulation is most defensible for inflammatory or SARD-like phenotypes, whereas antifibrotic therapy should be considered when progressive pulmonary fibrosis is established despite appropriate management. IPAF should therefore be viewed as a dynamic research phenotype within a continuum of lung-dominant autoimmunity, requiring longitudinal reassessment for evolution to a defined SARD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/objsua","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) may be the first or only clinically apparent manifestation of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD), preceding extrapulmonary features by months or years. The European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society research classification of interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) provides a framework for patients with interstitial pneumonia and autoimmune features who do not meet criteria for a defined SARD. Importantly, IPAF requires features from at least two of three domains - clinical, serologic, and morphologic - and cannot be assigned on autoantibody positivity alone. Extended, phenotype-directed autoantibody testing can reveal lung-dominant anti-synthetase syndrome, clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis, early systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, or Sjögren's syndrome (Autoimmune epithelitis). Prognosis is heterogeneous and is driven more consistently by the fibrotic burden, usual interstitial pneumonia pattern, baseline and longitudinal pulmonary physiology, and comorbidities than by the IPAF label itself. KL-6, surfactant protein D, CCL18, MMP-7, and multiplex proteomic signatures are promising biomarkers, but none is sufficiently validated to replace serial high-resolution computed tomography and pulmonary function testing. Management should be individualised through multidisciplinary discussion. Immunomodulation is most defensible for inflammatory or SARD-like phenotypes, whereas antifibrotic therapy should be considered when progressive pulmonary fibrosis is established despite appropriate management. IPAF should therefore be viewed as a dynamic research phenotype within a continuum of lung-dominant autoimmunity, requiring longitudinal reassessment for evolution to a defined SARD.

间质性肺疾病作为全身性自身免疫性疾病的初始表现:自身抗体、生物标志物、预后和管理的叙述性回顾
间质性肺疾病(ILD)可能是全身性自身免疫性风湿病(SARD)的第一个或唯一的临床明显表现,在肺外特征出现前数月或数年。欧洲呼吸学会/美国胸科学会对具有自身免疫性特征的间质性肺炎的研究分类(IPAF)为不符合定义的SARD标准的间质性肺炎和自身免疫性特征的患者提供了一个框架。重要的是,IPAF需要三个领域中的至少两个领域的特征——临床、血清学和形态学——并且不能仅仅根据自身抗体阳性来分配。扩展的,表型导向的自身抗体检测可以显示肺显性抗合成酶综合征,临床淀粉样皮肌炎,早期系统性硬化症,类风湿性关节炎,或Sjögren综合征(自身免疫性上皮炎)。预后是异质性的,与IPAF标签本身相比,更一致地由纤维化负担、通常的间质性肺炎模式、基线和纵向肺生理以及合并症驱动。KL-6、表面活性剂蛋白D、CCL18、MMP-7和多重蛋白质组学特征是很有前途的生物标志物,但没有一个被充分验证来取代一系列高分辨率计算机断层扫描和肺功能检测。管理应通过多学科讨论实现个性化。免疫调节对于炎性或sard样表型是最有效的,而当进行性肺纤维化虽然得到了适当的治疗,但仍应考虑抗纤维化治疗。因此,IPAF应被视为肺显性自身免疫连续体中的动态研究表型,需要纵向重新评估演变为定义的SARD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书