Determining Cerebrovascular Sensitivity to pH Using Continuous Arterial Blood Gas Analysis-A Prospective Observational Study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yu K Lam, Rogier V Immink, Rokus E C van den Dool, Jimmy Schenk, Denise P Veelo, Alexander P J Vlaar, Micah L A Heldeweg, Henning Hermanns, Bachir Essoussi, Eline Kho
{"title":"Determining Cerebrovascular Sensitivity to pH Using Continuous Arterial Blood Gas Analysis-A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Yu K Lam, Rogier V Immink, Rokus E C van den Dool, Jimmy Schenk, Denise P Veelo, Alexander P J Vlaar, Micah L A Heldeweg, Henning Hermanns, Bachir Essoussi, Eline Kho","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000008364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although carbon dioxide (CO2) is widely regarded as a driver for cerebral vasomodulation, often termed cerebrovascular CO2-reactivity, experimental evidence has shown that this response is primarily mediated through changes in pH rather than CO2. This complicates the management of cerebral blood flow (CBF) during the treatment of acid-base disorders with partial respiratory or metabolic compensation, when the CBF has normalized together with pH equilibration, despite persistent hyper- or hypercapnia. Although a pH-guided approach would therefore be preferred, no quantitative estimate of the relationship between pH and CBF has currently been reported in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the cerebrovascular sensitivity to pH and explore whether changes in CBF velocity (CBFV) are more closely related to arterial pH or CO2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, CBFV and continuous in-line arterial blood gas monitoring, incorporated in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, were analyzed. Mixed-effects models were constructed with percentage change in CBFV as response variable and arterial pH and/or CO2 as explanatory variable(s). Model fit of the explanatory variables was compared using marginal and conditional R2. Improvement of model fit and parsimony were assessed with the likelihood-ratio test (LRT) and change in Akaike information criterion (ΔAIC), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients were included in the analysis with a total of 1960 datapoints. CBFV decreased by 30.6% per 0.1 increase in arterial pH (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.9-32.2; P < .0001), and increased by 1.95% per mm Hg increase in PaCO2 (95% CI, 1.76-2.14; P < .0001). Arterial pH explained a greater proportion of variance than PaCO2 (marginal R2: 0.444 vs 0.294; conditional R2: 0.744 vs 0.530). Furthermore, adding arterial pH to the null CO2-model considerably improved model fit (LRT = 616.4) and parsimony (ΔAIC = -615), whereas adding arterial CO2 to the pH-model barely improved model fit (LRT = 4.6) and parsimony (ΔAIC = -3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This exploratory study provides a quantitative estimate of the relationship between CBFV and pH, and suggests that changes in CBFV are more closely related to arterial pH than to CO2. This estimate of the cerebrovascular sensitivity to pH was used to describe a feasible pH-guided approach in the management of CBF during the treatment of partially compensated acid-base disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000008364","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although carbon dioxide (CO2) is widely regarded as a driver for cerebral vasomodulation, often termed cerebrovascular CO2-reactivity, experimental evidence has shown that this response is primarily mediated through changes in pH rather than CO2. This complicates the management of cerebral blood flow (CBF) during the treatment of acid-base disorders with partial respiratory or metabolic compensation, when the CBF has normalized together with pH equilibration, despite persistent hyper- or hypercapnia. Although a pH-guided approach would therefore be preferred, no quantitative estimate of the relationship between pH and CBF has currently been reported in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the cerebrovascular sensitivity to pH and explore whether changes in CBF velocity (CBFV) are more closely related to arterial pH or CO2.

Methods: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, CBFV and continuous in-line arterial blood gas monitoring, incorporated in the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, were analyzed. Mixed-effects models were constructed with percentage change in CBFV as response variable and arterial pH and/or CO2 as explanatory variable(s). Model fit of the explanatory variables was compared using marginal and conditional R2. Improvement of model fit and parsimony were assessed with the likelihood-ratio test (LRT) and change in Akaike information criterion (ΔAIC), respectively.

Results: Thirteen patients were included in the analysis with a total of 1960 datapoints. CBFV decreased by 30.6% per 0.1 increase in arterial pH (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.9-32.2; P < .0001), and increased by 1.95% per mm Hg increase in PaCO2 (95% CI, 1.76-2.14; P < .0001). Arterial pH explained a greater proportion of variance than PaCO2 (marginal R2: 0.444 vs 0.294; conditional R2: 0.744 vs 0.530). Furthermore, adding arterial pH to the null CO2-model considerably improved model fit (LRT = 616.4) and parsimony (ΔAIC = -615), whereas adding arterial CO2 to the pH-model barely improved model fit (LRT = 4.6) and parsimony (ΔAIC = -3).

Conclusions: This exploratory study provides a quantitative estimate of the relationship between CBFV and pH, and suggests that changes in CBFV are more closely related to arterial pH than to CO2. This estimate of the cerebrovascular sensitivity to pH was used to describe a feasible pH-guided approach in the management of CBF during the treatment of partially compensated acid-base disorders.

确定脑血管对pH值的敏感性使用连续的动脉血气分析前瞻性观察性研究。
背景:虽然二氧化碳(CO2)被广泛认为是脑血管调节的驱动因素,通常被称为脑血管二氧化碳反应性,但实验证据表明,这种反应主要是通过pH值的变化而不是二氧化碳的变化介导的。这使得在治疗部分呼吸或代谢代偿的酸碱失调时脑血流(CBF)的管理变得复杂,尽管存在持续的高碳酸血症或高碳酸血症,但当CBF与pH平衡已经正常化时。因此,虽然pH引导的方法是首选的,但目前文献中还没有关于pH和CBF之间关系的定量估计。因此,本研究旨在评估脑血管对pH的敏感性,并探讨CBFV的变化与动脉pH或CO2的关系是否更密切。方法:对心脏手术患者的CBFV和连续在线动脉血气监测纳入体外循环进行分析。以CBFV百分比变化作为反应变量,动脉pH和/或CO2作为解释变量,构建混合效应模型。使用边际R2和条件R2比较解释变量的模型拟合。采用似然比检验(LRT)和Akaike信息准则变化(ΔAIC)分别评价模型拟合和简约性的改善。结果:13例患者纳入分析,共1960个数据点。动脉pH每升高0.1,CBFV降低30.6%(95%可信区间[CI], 28.9-32.2, P < 0.0001), PaCO2每升高mm Hg, CBFV升高1.95% (95% CI, 1.76-2.14, P < 0.0001)。动脉pH值比PaCO2解释更大的变异比例(边际R2: 0.444 vs 0.294;条件R2: 0.744 vs 0.530)。此外,在零二氧化碳模型中加入动脉pH显著改善了模型拟合(LRT = 616.4)和简约性(ΔAIC = -615),而在pH模型中加入动脉CO2几乎没有改善模型拟合(LRT = 4.6)和简约性(ΔAIC = -3)。结论:本探索性研究提供了CBFV与pH之间关系的定量估计,并表明CBFV的变化与动脉pH的关系比与CO2的关系更密切。脑血管对pH敏感性的估计用于描述在治疗部分代偿酸碱失调期间CBF管理中可行的pH引导方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书