Risk of recurrent acute pancreatitis with GLP-1 receptor agonists after prior pancreatitis: a systematic review.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Danielle L Voltani, Felipe G Pinto, Soemiwati Holland
{"title":"Risk of recurrent acute pancreatitis with GLP-1 receptor agonists after prior pancreatitis: a systematic review.","authors":"Danielle L Voltani, Felipe G Pinto, Soemiwati Holland","doi":"10.1007/s00592-026-02809-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. However, their safety in patients with prior pancreatitis remains uncertain. This systematic review aims to evaluate the risk of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) associated with GLP-1 RA therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for studies evaluating the safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or obesity and a history of acute pancreatitis. The primary outcome was recurrent acute pancreatitis. We included studies of adults with prior acute pancreatitis treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes, obesity, or related metabolic conditions. Studies without recurrent acute pancreatitis outcomes, pediatric populations, overlapping cohorts, insufficient data, or non-original publications were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included four studies comprising 10,624 patients, of whom 5,427 (51.0%) received GLP-1 receptor agonists. Two studies provided comparative data (5,224 GLP-1 RA users; 5,197 controls). GLP-1 receptor agonist use was associated with lower odds of recurrent acute pancreatitis than placebo (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.05-1.32) and lower risk than SGLT2 inhibitor use (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.52-0.64). Two additional studies provided recurrence rates among GLP-1 RA users with prior pancreatitis, reporting rates of 9.9% (95% CI 5.8%-16.3%) and 11.9% (95% CI 5.1%-25.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across the four included studies, GLP-1 receptor agonist use was not associated with an increase in RAP among patients with a prior history of acute pancreatitis. However, comparative evidence was limited to two studies, warranting cautious interpretation of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":6921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Diabetologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Diabetologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-026-02809-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. However, their safety in patients with prior pancreatitis remains uncertain. This systematic review aims to evaluate the risk of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) associated with GLP-1 RA therapy.

Methods: We systematically searched for studies evaluating the safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or obesity and a history of acute pancreatitis. The primary outcome was recurrent acute pancreatitis. We included studies of adults with prior acute pancreatitis treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes, obesity, or related metabolic conditions. Studies without recurrent acute pancreatitis outcomes, pediatric populations, overlapping cohorts, insufficient data, or non-original publications were excluded.

Results: We included four studies comprising 10,624 patients, of whom 5,427 (51.0%) received GLP-1 receptor agonists. Two studies provided comparative data (5,224 GLP-1 RA users; 5,197 controls). GLP-1 receptor agonist use was associated with lower odds of recurrent acute pancreatitis than placebo (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.05-1.32) and lower risk than SGLT2 inhibitor use (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.52-0.64). Two additional studies provided recurrence rates among GLP-1 RA users with prior pancreatitis, reporting rates of 9.9% (95% CI 5.8%-16.3%) and 11.9% (95% CI 5.1%-25.8%).

Conclusion: Across the four included studies, GLP-1 receptor agonist use was not associated with an increase in RAP among patients with a prior history of acute pancreatitis. However, comparative evidence was limited to two studies, warranting cautious interpretation of these findings.

既往胰腺炎后GLP-1受体激动剂复发急性胰腺炎的风险:系统回顾。
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, GLP-1 RAs)广泛用于2型糖尿病(T2D)和肥胖患者。然而,它们在既往胰腺炎患者中的安全性仍不确定。本系统综述旨在评估与GLP-1 RA治疗相关的复发性急性胰腺炎(RAP)风险。方法:我们系统地检索了评估GLP-1受体激动剂对2型糖尿病(T2DM)或肥胖且有急性胰腺炎病史的成人患者安全性的研究。主要结局是复发性急性胰腺炎。我们纳入了既往用GLP-1受体激动剂治疗2型糖尿病、肥胖或相关代谢疾病的急性胰腺炎成人的研究。没有复发性急性胰腺炎结局的研究、儿科人群、重叠队列、数据不足或非原创出版物被排除在外。结果:我们纳入了4项研究,包括10,624例患者,其中5,427例(51.0%)接受了GLP-1受体激动剂。两项研究提供了比较数据(5,224名GLP-1 RA使用者;5,197名对照组)。使用GLP-1受体激动剂与急性胰腺炎复发的几率比安慰剂低(OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.05-1.32),比使用SGLT2抑制剂的风险低(OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.52-0.64)。另外两项研究提供了既往胰腺炎的GLP-1 RA使用者的复发率,报告率为9.9% (95% CI 5.8%-16.3%)和11.9% (95% CI 5.1%-25.8%)。结论:在纳入的四项研究中,GLP-1受体激动剂的使用与既往有急性胰腺炎病史的患者RAP的增加无关。然而,比较证据仅限于两项研究,需要对这些发现进行谨慎的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Diabetologica
Acta Diabetologica 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Acta Diabetologica is a journal that publishes reports of experimental and clinical research on diabetes mellitus and related metabolic diseases. Original contributions on biochemical, physiological, pathophysiological and clinical aspects of research on diabetes and metabolic diseases are welcome. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications and letters to the editor. Invited reviews and editorials are also published. A Methodology forum, which publishes contributions on methodological aspects of diabetes in vivo and in vitro, is also available. The Editor-in-chief will be pleased to consider articles describing new techniques (e.g., new transplantation methods, metabolic models), of innovative importance in the field of diabetes/metabolism. Finally, workshop reports are also welcome in Acta Diabetologica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书