Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factors in East Africa

IF 3.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yan Wu, Xiumei Zhang, Sisay Mekonnen, Bo Ma
{"title":"Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factors in East Africa","authors":"Yan Wu,&nbsp;Xiumei Zhang,&nbsp;Sisay Mekonnen,&nbsp;Bo Ma","doi":"10.1007/s10661-026-16042-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Global climatic variations and intensified human activities have altered land use structures and disrupted landscape patterns, increasing landscape ecological risk. Assessing this risk contributes to the formulation of ecological conservation and sustainable development strategies. Research on landscape ecological risk assessment and its drivers in Africa, particularly in rapidly developing East Africa, remains insufficient, which hinders regional ecological risk management and sustainable economic development. We investigated landscape patterns and spatiotemporal variations in regional ecological risk from 1992 to 2022 in East Africa using Geodetector and Random Forest models, measured the explanatory power and interaction effects of natural and human drivers, and quantified their contributions. We found that landscape patterns changed drastically in East Africa. Woodland and sparse vegetation increased by 12.30 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup> and 2.89 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>, respectively; shrubland and bare land decreased by 11.10 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup> and 5.91 × 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Ecological risk showed a north-high, south-low spatial pattern with positive autocorrelation (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). High, sub-high, and medium risk areas decreased, suggesting a downward trend. The distribution of landscape ecological risk in East Africa was mainly influenced by vegetation conditions and annual precipitation; vegetation change dominated the landscape ecological risk pattern, and natural and human factors influenced landscape resilience. Overall, our findings may inform ecological conservation planning in East Africa. Ecological management should give greater attention to vegetation protection and restoration, while landscape planning should consider regional precipitation conditions to help reduce ecological risk and promote sustainable development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"198 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-026-16042-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global climatic variations and intensified human activities have altered land use structures and disrupted landscape patterns, increasing landscape ecological risk. Assessing this risk contributes to the formulation of ecological conservation and sustainable development strategies. Research on landscape ecological risk assessment and its drivers in Africa, particularly in rapidly developing East Africa, remains insufficient, which hinders regional ecological risk management and sustainable economic development. We investigated landscape patterns and spatiotemporal variations in regional ecological risk from 1992 to 2022 in East Africa using Geodetector and Random Forest models, measured the explanatory power and interaction effects of natural and human drivers, and quantified their contributions. We found that landscape patterns changed drastically in East Africa. Woodland and sparse vegetation increased by 12.30 × 104 km2 and 2.89 × 104 km2, respectively; shrubland and bare land decreased by 11.10 × 104 km2 and 5.91 × 104 km2, respectively. Ecological risk showed a north-high, south-low spatial pattern with positive autocorrelation (P < 0.001). High, sub-high, and medium risk areas decreased, suggesting a downward trend. The distribution of landscape ecological risk in East Africa was mainly influenced by vegetation conditions and annual precipitation; vegetation change dominated the landscape ecological risk pattern, and natural and human factors influenced landscape resilience. Overall, our findings may inform ecological conservation planning in East Africa. Ecological management should give greater attention to vegetation protection and restoration, while landscape planning should consider regional precipitation conditions to help reduce ecological risk and promote sustainable development.

东非景观生态风险评价及其驱动因素
全球气候变化和人类活动加剧改变了土地利用结构,破坏了景观格局,增加了景观生态风险。评估这种风险有助于制定生态保护和可持续发展战略。非洲特别是快速发展的东非地区景观生态风险评价及其驱动因素研究不足,阻碍了区域生态风险管理和经济可持续发展。利用地理探测器和随机森林模型研究了1992 - 2022年东非区域生态风险的景观格局和时空变化,测量了自然和人为驱动因素的解释力和相互作用效应,并量化了它们的贡献。我们发现东非的景观格局发生了巨大的变化。林地和稀疏植被分别增加12.30 × 104 km2和2.89 × 104 km2;灌木林和裸地分别减少11.10 × 104 km2和5.91 × 104 km2。生态风险呈北高南低的空间格局,呈正自相关(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书