Narrative reconstruction of the self: Living funerals as rituals of trauma and transformation

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Australian Journal of Anthropology Pub Date : 2026-10-14 Epub Date: 2026-04-07 DOI:10.1111/taja.70073
Yuen-Ki Tang
{"title":"Narrative reconstruction of the self: Living funerals as rituals of trauma and transformation","authors":"Yuen-Ki Tang","doi":"10.1111/taja.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Living funerals mark a radical reconfiguration of contemporary engagements with mortality, transforming death from an imposed ending into an actively authored narrative. This study examines the practice in Hong Kong's hybrid sociocultural landscape, where traditional Chinese death rituals collide with neoliberal selfhood and globalised memorialisation practices. Through an ethnographic analysis of a living funeral ceremony, centred on entrepreneur Ms D and involving 12 participants, we reveal how these rituals function as liminal narrative spaces, destabilising binaries between life/death, mourner/deceased, and past/future. Drawing on narrative identity theory and ritual studies, we argue that living funerals enact three transformative mechanisms: (1) narrative sovereignty, where participants reclaim agency over their life stories, challenging Confucian and Christian norms that cede death narratives to communal authority; (2) communal catharsis, wherein shared affect (laughter, tears, silence) generates what participants termed ‘grief that builds rather than buries’; and (3) liminal objects, repurposed funeral artefacts that serve as cultural palimpsests, erasing and rewriting traditional death ways. Ms D's ceremony, featuring anticipatory eulogies, inverted ritual roles, and a courtroom-like confrontation with her past, exemplifies how these rituals address existential anxieties while fostering closure and unresolved relational repair. Yet these innovations provoke narrative friction. The celebratory ethos of living funerals clashes with Cantonese mourning's structured solemnity, exposing generational rifts and cultural symptoms: practices that lay bare societal struggles to reconcile filial duty with neoliberal self-reinvention. Older participants reported feeling ‘ritual homelessness’, while younger attendees embraced the DIY ethos as existential democracy, a collaborative reimagining of life's final chapter. Ultimately, living funerals do not reject tradition but stretch its forms, rendering visible what all mortuary rituals are: not conclusions, but acts of narrative courage.</p>","PeriodicalId":45452,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","volume":"37 2","pages":"364-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/taja.70073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/taja.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Living funerals mark a radical reconfiguration of contemporary engagements with mortality, transforming death from an imposed ending into an actively authored narrative. This study examines the practice in Hong Kong's hybrid sociocultural landscape, where traditional Chinese death rituals collide with neoliberal selfhood and globalised memorialisation practices. Through an ethnographic analysis of a living funeral ceremony, centred on entrepreneur Ms D and involving 12 participants, we reveal how these rituals function as liminal narrative spaces, destabilising binaries between life/death, mourner/deceased, and past/future. Drawing on narrative identity theory and ritual studies, we argue that living funerals enact three transformative mechanisms: (1) narrative sovereignty, where participants reclaim agency over their life stories, challenging Confucian and Christian norms that cede death narratives to communal authority; (2) communal catharsis, wherein shared affect (laughter, tears, silence) generates what participants termed ‘grief that builds rather than buries’; and (3) liminal objects, repurposed funeral artefacts that serve as cultural palimpsests, erasing and rewriting traditional death ways. Ms D's ceremony, featuring anticipatory eulogies, inverted ritual roles, and a courtroom-like confrontation with her past, exemplifies how these rituals address existential anxieties while fostering closure and unresolved relational repair. Yet these innovations provoke narrative friction. The celebratory ethos of living funerals clashes with Cantonese mourning's structured solemnity, exposing generational rifts and cultural symptoms: practices that lay bare societal struggles to reconcile filial duty with neoliberal self-reinvention. Older participants reported feeling ‘ritual homelessness’, while younger attendees embraced the DIY ethos as existential democracy, a collaborative reimagining of life's final chapter. Ultimately, living funerals do not reject tradition but stretch its forms, rendering visible what all mortuary rituals are: not conclusions, but acts of narrative courage.

自我的叙事重建:作为创伤和转变仪式的活着的葬礼
活着的葬礼标志着当代对死亡的彻底重新配置,将死亡从一种强加的结局转变为一种主动创作的叙述。本研究考察了香港混合社会文化景观中的实践,在这里,中国传统的死亡仪式与新自由主义的自我和全球化的纪念实践发生了冲突。通过以企业家D女士为中心,涉及12名参与者的活人葬礼仪式的民族志分析,我们揭示了这些仪式如何作为有限的叙事空间发挥作用,破坏了生/死、哀悼者/死者、过去/未来之间的二元关系。根据叙事认同理论和仪式研究,我们认为活葬制定了三种变革机制:(1)叙事主权,参与者重新获得对其生命故事的代理,挑战儒家和基督教将死亡叙事交给社区权威的规范;(2)集体宣泄,其中共同的情感(笑声、眼泪、沉默)产生参与者所说的“建立而不是埋葬的悲伤”;(3)阈限对象,作为文化重写的重新用途的丧葬器物,抹去和重写传统的死亡方式。D女士的仪式以预见性的悼词、颠倒的仪式角色以及与她的过去的法庭式对抗为特色,体现了这些仪式如何解决存在的焦虑,同时促进封闭和未解决的关系修复。然而,这些创新引发了叙事摩擦。活葬的庆祝精神与广东哀悼的结构庄严相冲突,暴露了代沟和文化症状:这种做法暴露了社会在孝道与新自由主义自我重塑之间的斗争。年长的参与者报告说,他们感到“仪式性的无家可归”,而年轻的参与者则将DIY的精神视为存在主义的民主,一种对生命最后篇章的合作重新想象。最终,活着的葬礼并没有拒绝传统,而是扩展了它的形式,呈现出所有殡葬仪式的本质:不是结论,而是叙事勇气的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书