A finite algebraic target theorem for Kreisel’s conjecture

IF 0.5 4区 数学 Q1 Arts and Humanities
Mario Piazza
{"title":"A finite algebraic target theorem for Kreisel’s conjecture","authors":"Mario Piazza","doi":"10.1007/s00153-026-01029-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Friedman’s Problem 34, attributed there to Kreisel, states that for Peano arithmetic formalized precisely as in Kleene, a uniform bound on the proof lengths of all numeral instances <span>\\(A(\\bar{n})\\)</span> entails the provability of the universal closure <span>\\(\\forall x\\,A(x)\\)</span>. We refer to this statement as Kreisel’s conjecture (KC). Parikh proved the corresponding implication for a relational presentation of Peano arithmetic. Bounded proof analyses have a finite automata-theoretic shadow: suppressing formula instantiations leaves a finite partial automaton whose states record only which schematic continuations remain possible. We characterize exactly when the map sending a word to the idempotent power of its transformation factors through a finite semilattice. The finite criterion separates a failure of commutativity among the idempotents associated with the generators from one that first appears for a composite word. The latter always has a witness whose length is bounded by the size of the transition monoid. In the positive case, the idempotent-power map retracts the transition monoid onto its full set of idempotents. Parikh’s case changes the picture. For the prefix automata of bounded proof trees, already before minimization every nonempty word has the empty partial map as its idempotent power, and the nonidentity transformations form a nilpotent ideal. Yet the universal implication still holds. What Parikh’s proof retains is not continuation behaviour but realization: which analyses prove which numeral instances. The resulting realization profiles determine the coarsest finite quotient of <span>\\(\\mathbb {N}\\)</span> retaining every realization set. In Parikh’s presentation, the resulting equivalence relation and its classes are effectively definable in Presburger arithmetic, and the assignment sending each numeral to its realization profile is effectively ultimately periodic. The comparison separates exact algebraic compression of continuations from the arithmetic information needed for the passage to the universal closure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48853,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":"65 7","pages":"905 - 924"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00153-026-01029-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-026-01029-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Friedman’s Problem 34, attributed there to Kreisel, states that for Peano arithmetic formalized precisely as in Kleene, a uniform bound on the proof lengths of all numeral instances \(A(\bar{n})\) entails the provability of the universal closure \(\forall x\,A(x)\). We refer to this statement as Kreisel’s conjecture (KC). Parikh proved the corresponding implication for a relational presentation of Peano arithmetic. Bounded proof analyses have a finite automata-theoretic shadow: suppressing formula instantiations leaves a finite partial automaton whose states record only which schematic continuations remain possible. We characterize exactly when the map sending a word to the idempotent power of its transformation factors through a finite semilattice. The finite criterion separates a failure of commutativity among the idempotents associated with the generators from one that first appears for a composite word. The latter always has a witness whose length is bounded by the size of the transition monoid. In the positive case, the idempotent-power map retracts the transition monoid onto its full set of idempotents. Parikh’s case changes the picture. For the prefix automata of bounded proof trees, already before minimization every nonempty word has the empty partial map as its idempotent power, and the nonidentity transformations form a nilpotent ideal. Yet the universal implication still holds. What Parikh’s proof retains is not continuation behaviour but realization: which analyses prove which numeral instances. The resulting realization profiles determine the coarsest finite quotient of \(\mathbb {N}\) retaining every realization set. In Parikh’s presentation, the resulting equivalence relation and its classes are effectively definable in Presburger arithmetic, and the assignment sending each numeral to its realization profile is effectively ultimately periodic. The comparison separates exact algebraic compression of continuations from the arithmetic information needed for the passage to the universal closure.

Kreisel猜想的有限代数目标定理
弗里德曼的问题34,被归为Kreisel,指出对于精确形式化于Kleene的Peano算术,所有数值实例的证明长度的统一界\(A(\bar{n})\)包含了全称闭包\(\forall x\,A(x)\)的可证明性。我们把这种说法称为克瑞塞尔猜想(KC)。Parikh证明了Peano算法的关系表示的相应含义。有界证明分析有一个有限自动机理论的阴影:抑制公式实例化留下一个有限部分自动机,它的状态只记录哪些图解延续是可能的。当映射通过有限半格将一个字发送到其变换因子的幂等幂时,我们精确地描述了它的特征。有限准则将与生成器相关的幂等元之间的可交换性失效与首次出现在复合词中的可交换性失效区分开来。后者总是有一个见证,其长度由过渡单形的大小限定。在正的情况下,幂等-幂映射将过渡幺正像缩回到它的全幂等集合上。帕里克的案子改变了局面。对于有界证明树的前缀自动机,在最小化之前,每个非空词都有空的部分映射作为其幂等幂,非等变换形成一个幂零理想。然而,普遍的含义仍然成立。Parikh的证明保留的不是延续行为,而是实现:哪个分析证明了哪个数字实例。所得的实现轮廓确定保留每个实现集的\(\mathbb {N}\)的最粗有限商。在Parikh的介绍中,所得到的等价关系及其类在Presburger算法中是可有效定义的,并且将每个数字发送到其实现轮廓的赋值是有效的最终周期性的。这种比较将延拓的精确代数压缩与传递到泛闭包所需的算术信息分开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archive for Mathematical Logic
Archive for Mathematical Logic MATHEMATICS-LOGIC
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书