{"title":"A finite algebraic target theorem for Kreisel’s conjecture","authors":"Mario Piazza","doi":"10.1007/s00153-026-01029-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Friedman’s Problem 34, attributed there to Kreisel, states that for Peano arithmetic formalized precisely as in Kleene, a uniform bound on the proof lengths of all numeral instances <span>\\(A(\\bar{n})\\)</span> entails the provability of the universal closure <span>\\(\\forall x\\,A(x)\\)</span>. We refer to this statement as Kreisel’s conjecture (KC). Parikh proved the corresponding implication for a relational presentation of Peano arithmetic. Bounded proof analyses have a finite automata-theoretic shadow: suppressing formula instantiations leaves a finite partial automaton whose states record only which schematic continuations remain possible. We characterize exactly when the map sending a word to the idempotent power of its transformation factors through a finite semilattice. The finite criterion separates a failure of commutativity among the idempotents associated with the generators from one that first appears for a composite word. The latter always has a witness whose length is bounded by the size of the transition monoid. In the positive case, the idempotent-power map retracts the transition monoid onto its full set of idempotents. Parikh’s case changes the picture. For the prefix automata of bounded proof trees, already before minimization every nonempty word has the empty partial map as its idempotent power, and the nonidentity transformations form a nilpotent ideal. Yet the universal implication still holds. What Parikh’s proof retains is not continuation behaviour but realization: which analyses prove which numeral instances. The resulting realization profiles determine the coarsest finite quotient of <span>\\(\\mathbb {N}\\)</span> retaining every realization set. In Parikh’s presentation, the resulting equivalence relation and its classes are effectively definable in Presburger arithmetic, and the assignment sending each numeral to its realization profile is effectively ultimately periodic. The comparison separates exact algebraic compression of continuations from the arithmetic information needed for the passage to the universal closure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48853,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":"65 7","pages":"905 - 924"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00153-026-01029-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-026-01029-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Friedman’s Problem 34, attributed there to Kreisel, states that for Peano arithmetic formalized precisely as in Kleene, a uniform bound on the proof lengths of all numeral instances \(A(\bar{n})\) entails the provability of the universal closure \(\forall x\,A(x)\). We refer to this statement as Kreisel’s conjecture (KC). Parikh proved the corresponding implication for a relational presentation of Peano arithmetic. Bounded proof analyses have a finite automata-theoretic shadow: suppressing formula instantiations leaves a finite partial automaton whose states record only which schematic continuations remain possible. We characterize exactly when the map sending a word to the idempotent power of its transformation factors through a finite semilattice. The finite criterion separates a failure of commutativity among the idempotents associated with the generators from one that first appears for a composite word. The latter always has a witness whose length is bounded by the size of the transition monoid. In the positive case, the idempotent-power map retracts the transition monoid onto its full set of idempotents. Parikh’s case changes the picture. For the prefix automata of bounded proof trees, already before minimization every nonempty word has the empty partial map as its idempotent power, and the nonidentity transformations form a nilpotent ideal. Yet the universal implication still holds. What Parikh’s proof retains is not continuation behaviour but realization: which analyses prove which numeral instances. The resulting realization profiles determine the coarsest finite quotient of \(\mathbb {N}\) retaining every realization set. In Parikh’s presentation, the resulting equivalence relation and its classes are effectively definable in Presburger arithmetic, and the assignment sending each numeral to its realization profile is effectively ultimately periodic. The comparison separates exact algebraic compression of continuations from the arithmetic information needed for the passage to the universal closure.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.