Rough sets under incomplete information: Concept formation and three-way decision perspectives

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Yiyu Yao, Junfang Luo, Qiaoyi Li
{"title":"Rough sets under incomplete information: Concept formation and three-way decision perspectives","authors":"Yiyu Yao,&nbsp;Junfang Luo,&nbsp;Qiaoyi Li","doi":"10.1007/s10489-026-07518-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A research direction in generalizing Pawlak rough sets is to consider incomplete information. One of the common practices is to replace an equivalence relation on a set of objects by various similarity relations to account for the incomplete information. Typically, one defines similarity relations based on some intuitive understanding of incomplete information. What lacks in the existing studies is a satisfactory formal formulation on a sound semantics foundation. In this paper, we present a formal model for interpreting and constructing concept-based granular rough sets under incomplete information, with a direct reference to one of the main purposes of rough set theory for data analysis and concept forming. Our formulation is based on a conjunctive concept space. For an object, we identify the most specific conjunctive concept to which the object is an instance. By using the ideas of possible world semantics of incomplete information suggested by Lipski, for the conjunctive concept, we derive a pair of extensions, namely, the set of objects that are known to be instances and the set of objects that are possible instances. We show that these two extensions are the neighborhoods induced by two similarity relations, which provides a formal and sound semantics of similarity relations. Finally, we use the proposed model to probe into the ideas of concept-based granular rough sets and three-way decision under incomplete information. Our investigation on the semantics reveals some difficulties with existing methods and calls for more studies on semantics related issues. The result will be useful in guiding future research and preventing misuse of models of incomplete information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8041,"journal":{"name":"Applied Intelligence","volume":"56 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-026-07518-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A research direction in generalizing Pawlak rough sets is to consider incomplete information. One of the common practices is to replace an equivalence relation on a set of objects by various similarity relations to account for the incomplete information. Typically, one defines similarity relations based on some intuitive understanding of incomplete information. What lacks in the existing studies is a satisfactory formal formulation on a sound semantics foundation. In this paper, we present a formal model for interpreting and constructing concept-based granular rough sets under incomplete information, with a direct reference to one of the main purposes of rough set theory for data analysis and concept forming. Our formulation is based on a conjunctive concept space. For an object, we identify the most specific conjunctive concept to which the object is an instance. By using the ideas of possible world semantics of incomplete information suggested by Lipski, for the conjunctive concept, we derive a pair of extensions, namely, the set of objects that are known to be instances and the set of objects that are possible instances. We show that these two extensions are the neighborhoods induced by two similarity relations, which provides a formal and sound semantics of similarity relations. Finally, we use the proposed model to probe into the ideas of concept-based granular rough sets and three-way decision under incomplete information. Our investigation on the semantics reveals some difficulties with existing methods and calls for more studies on semantics related issues. The result will be useful in guiding future research and preventing misuse of models of incomplete information.

Abstract Image

不完全信息下的粗糙集:概念形成和三向决策视角
考虑不完全信息是泛化Pawlak粗糙集的一个研究方向。一种常见的做法是用各种相似关系代替一组对象上的等价关系来解释不完全信息。通常,人们基于对不完全信息的一些直观理解来定义相似关系。现有研究缺乏的是建立在良好语义基础上的令人满意的形式表述。在本文中,我们提出了一个在不完全信息下解释和构造基于概念的颗粒粗糙集的形式化模型,直接参考了粗糙集理论用于数据分析和概念形成的主要目的之一。我们的公式是基于一个合取概念空间的。对于一个对象,我们确定该对象作为实例的最具体的连接概念。利用Lipski提出的不完全信息的可能世界语义思想,对合取概念导出了一对扩展,即已知为实例的对象集和可能实例的对象集。我们证明了这两个扩展是由两个相似关系引起的邻域,这提供了一个形式化的、健全的相似关系语义。最后,利用该模型探讨了基于概念的颗粒粗糙集和不完全信息下的三向决策思想。我们对语义学的研究揭示了现有方法存在的一些困难,并呼吁对语义学相关问题进行更多的研究。该结果将有助于指导未来的研究和防止不完全信息模型的滥用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Intelligence
Applied Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.80%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: With a focus on research in artificial intelligence and neural networks, this journal addresses issues involving solutions of real-life manufacturing, defense, management, government and industrial problems which are too complex to be solved through conventional approaches and require the simulation of intelligent thought processes, heuristics, applications of knowledge, and distributed and parallel processing. The integration of these multiple approaches in solving complex problems is of particular importance. The journal presents new and original research and technological developments, addressing real and complex issues applicable to difficult problems. It provides a medium for exchanging scientific research and technological achievements accomplished by the international community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书