Probing polymer effects on interfacial Li-ion transport in hybrid solid electrolytes: LLZO–PCL compared with LLZO–PEO

IF 3 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Gourav Shukla,Melania Kozdra,Laura Hoelzer,Diddo Diddens,Andreas Heuer
{"title":"Probing polymer effects on interfacial Li-ion transport in hybrid solid electrolytes: LLZO–PCL compared with LLZO–PEO","authors":"Gourav Shukla,Melania Kozdra,Laura Hoelzer,Diddo Diddens,Andreas Heuer","doi":"10.1039/d6cp02019d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid polymer–ceramic electrolytes are promising candidates for solid-state lithium-ion batteries, yet ion transport at polymer–ceramic interfaces often limits performance. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations at elevated temperatures are used to investigate {\\color{black} differences in $\\rm Li^{+}$ transport between PCL- and PEO-based polymer–ceramic interfaces}. The investigated interface is built of $\\rm Li_7La_3Zr_2O_{12}$ (LLZO) ceramic and poly($\\rm \\varepsilon$-caprolactone) (PCL) polymer doped with bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) (LLZO–PCL), and a direct comparison is established with an analogous interface composed of LiTFSI-doped poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and LLZO (LLZO–PEO). The LLZO–PCL interface exhibits pronounced interfacial structuring, including strong adsorption of hydroxyl oxygen atoms at the ceramic surface. $\\rm Li^{+}$ transfer across the interface is quantified from transition statistics and analyzed using free-energy profiles. Remarkably, LLZO–PCL exhibits an approximately 35-fold larger phase-exchange barrier (PEB) rate than LLZO–PEO, primarily due to a significantly lower PEB height for polymer–ceramic transfer. Analysis within the framework of overdamped Kramers theory indicates strongly damped interfacial dynamics and suggests spatially heterogeneous friction along the reaction coordinate. Overall, the results demonstrate that {\\color{black} the substantially different interfacial $\\rm Li^{+}$ transfer in PCL and PEO is mainly associated with differences in the PEB height}. Our previously developed multiscale framework is used to evaluate which {\\color{black} of the two polymer systems} is more likely to enhance the overall conductivity in hybrid solid electrolytes by facilitating $\\rm Li^{+}$ transport through the fast ceramic phase. Finally, effective Li–polymer coordination strength and polymer adhesion at the ceramic surface emerge as key factors governing interfacial ion transport and the efficient utilization of ceramic transport pathways in hybrid solid electrolytes.","PeriodicalId":99,"journal":{"name":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6cp02019d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hybrid polymer–ceramic electrolytes are promising candidates for solid-state lithium-ion batteries, yet ion transport at polymer–ceramic interfaces often limits performance. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations at elevated temperatures are used to investigate {\color{black} differences in $\rm Li^{+}$ transport between PCL- and PEO-based polymer–ceramic interfaces}. The investigated interface is built of $\rm Li_7La_3Zr_2O_{12}$ (LLZO) ceramic and poly($\rm \varepsilon$-caprolactone) (PCL) polymer doped with bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) (LLZO–PCL), and a direct comparison is established with an analogous interface composed of LiTFSI-doped poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and LLZO (LLZO–PEO). The LLZO–PCL interface exhibits pronounced interfacial structuring, including strong adsorption of hydroxyl oxygen atoms at the ceramic surface. $\rm Li^{+}$ transfer across the interface is quantified from transition statistics and analyzed using free-energy profiles. Remarkably, LLZO–PCL exhibits an approximately 35-fold larger phase-exchange barrier (PEB) rate than LLZO–PEO, primarily due to a significantly lower PEB height for polymer–ceramic transfer. Analysis within the framework of overdamped Kramers theory indicates strongly damped interfacial dynamics and suggests spatially heterogeneous friction along the reaction coordinate. Overall, the results demonstrate that {\color{black} the substantially different interfacial $\rm Li^{+}$ transfer in PCL and PEO is mainly associated with differences in the PEB height}. Our previously developed multiscale framework is used to evaluate which {\color{black} of the two polymer systems} is more likely to enhance the overall conductivity in hybrid solid electrolytes by facilitating $\rm Li^{+}$ transport through the fast ceramic phase. Finally, effective Li–polymer coordination strength and polymer adhesion at the ceramic surface emerge as key factors governing interfacial ion transport and the efficient utilization of ceramic transport pathways in hybrid solid electrolytes.
探测聚合物对混合固体电解质中锂离子界面输运的影响:LLZO-PCL与LLZO-PEO的比较
聚合物-陶瓷混合电解质是固态锂离子电池的理想选择,但聚合物-陶瓷界面的离子输运往往会限制其性能。利用高温下原子分子动力学模拟研究了PCL-和peo -基聚合物-陶瓷界面之间$\rm Li^{+}$输运的{\色{黑}差异。所研究的界面是由$\rm li_7la_3zr_2o_{12}$ (LLZO)陶瓷和掺杂双(三氟甲烷磺酰)亚胺(LiTFSI) (LLZO - PCL)的聚($\rm \varepsilon$-己内酯)(PCL)聚合物(LLZO - PCL)组成的,并与掺杂LiTFSI的聚(环氧乙烷)(PEO)和LLZO (LLZO - PEO)组成的类似界面建立了直接比较。LLZO-PCL界面表现出明显的界面结构,包括羟基氧原子在陶瓷表面的强吸附。$\rm Li^{+}$在界面上的转移是由跃迁统计量化的,并使用自由能谱进行分析。值得注意的是,LLZO-PCL的相交换势垒(PEB)速率比LLZO-PEO高约35倍,这主要是由于聚合物-陶瓷转移的PEB高度明显较低。在过阻尼Kramers理论框架内的分析表明,界面动力学是强阻尼的,并表明沿反应坐标的空间非均质摩擦。总体而言,结果表明,PCL和PEO中{\color{black}的界面$\rm Li^{+}$转移的本质差异主要与PEB高度的差异有关。我们先前开发的多尺度框架用于评估两种聚合物体系中哪一种{\颜色{黑色}}更有可能通过促进$\rm Li^{+}$在快速陶瓷相中的传输来提高混合固体电解质的整体导电性。最后,有效的li -聚合物配位强度和聚合物在陶瓷表面的粘附力是控制混合固体电解质中界面离子传输和陶瓷传输途径有效利用的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
2675
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书