{"title":"Probing polymer effects on interfacial Li-ion transport in hybrid solid electrolytes: LLZO–PCL compared with LLZO–PEO","authors":"Gourav Shukla,Melania Kozdra,Laura Hoelzer,Diddo Diddens,Andreas Heuer","doi":"10.1039/d6cp02019d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid polymer–ceramic electrolytes are promising candidates for solid-state lithium-ion batteries, yet ion transport at polymer–ceramic interfaces often limits performance. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations at elevated temperatures are used to investigate {\\color{black} differences in $\\rm Li^{+}$ transport between PCL- and PEO-based polymer–ceramic interfaces}. The investigated interface is built of $\\rm Li_7La_3Zr_2O_{12}$ (LLZO) ceramic and poly($\\rm \\varepsilon$-caprolactone) (PCL) polymer doped with bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) (LLZO–PCL), and a direct comparison is established with an analogous interface composed of LiTFSI-doped poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and LLZO (LLZO–PEO). The LLZO–PCL interface exhibits pronounced interfacial structuring, including strong adsorption of hydroxyl oxygen atoms at the ceramic surface. $\\rm Li^{+}$ transfer across the interface is quantified from transition statistics and analyzed using free-energy profiles. Remarkably, LLZO–PCL exhibits an approximately 35-fold larger phase-exchange barrier (PEB) rate than LLZO–PEO, primarily due to a significantly lower PEB height for polymer–ceramic transfer. Analysis within the framework of overdamped Kramers theory indicates strongly damped interfacial dynamics and suggests spatially heterogeneous friction along the reaction coordinate. Overall, the results demonstrate that {\\color{black} the substantially different interfacial $\\rm Li^{+}$ transfer in PCL and PEO is mainly associated with differences in the PEB height}. Our previously developed multiscale framework is used to evaluate which {\\color{black} of the two polymer systems} is more likely to enhance the overall conductivity in hybrid solid electrolytes by facilitating $\\rm Li^{+}$ transport through the fast ceramic phase. Finally, effective Li–polymer coordination strength and polymer adhesion at the ceramic surface emerge as key factors governing interfacial ion transport and the efficient utilization of ceramic transport pathways in hybrid solid electrolytes.","PeriodicalId":99,"journal":{"name":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6cp02019d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hybrid polymer–ceramic electrolytes are promising candidates for solid-state lithium-ion batteries, yet ion transport at polymer–ceramic interfaces often limits performance. Atomistic molecular dynamics simulations at elevated temperatures are used to investigate {\color{black} differences in $\rm Li^{+}$ transport between PCL- and PEO-based polymer–ceramic interfaces}. The investigated interface is built of $\rm Li_7La_3Zr_2O_{12}$ (LLZO) ceramic and poly($\rm \varepsilon$-caprolactone) (PCL) polymer doped with bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) (LLZO–PCL), and a direct comparison is established with an analogous interface composed of LiTFSI-doped poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and LLZO (LLZO–PEO). The LLZO–PCL interface exhibits pronounced interfacial structuring, including strong adsorption of hydroxyl oxygen atoms at the ceramic surface. $\rm Li^{+}$ transfer across the interface is quantified from transition statistics and analyzed using free-energy profiles. Remarkably, LLZO–PCL exhibits an approximately 35-fold larger phase-exchange barrier (PEB) rate than LLZO–PEO, primarily due to a significantly lower PEB height for polymer–ceramic transfer. Analysis within the framework of overdamped Kramers theory indicates strongly damped interfacial dynamics and suggests spatially heterogeneous friction along the reaction coordinate. Overall, the results demonstrate that {\color{black} the substantially different interfacial $\rm Li^{+}$ transfer in PCL and PEO is mainly associated with differences in the PEB height}. Our previously developed multiscale framework is used to evaluate which {\color{black} of the two polymer systems} is more likely to enhance the overall conductivity in hybrid solid electrolytes by facilitating $\rm Li^{+}$ transport through the fast ceramic phase. Finally, effective Li–polymer coordination strength and polymer adhesion at the ceramic surface emerge as key factors governing interfacial ion transport and the efficient utilization of ceramic transport pathways in hybrid solid electrolytes.
期刊介绍:
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions.
The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.