Paul S Micevych, Abu Tahir Taha, Anika Kumar, Jay M Stewart
{"title":"Short-Term Outcomes of Two Interventions for Patients With Active Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in an Urban, Safety-Net Hospital.","authors":"Paul S Micevych, Abu Tahir Taha, Anika Kumar, Jay M Stewart","doi":"10.1002/hcs2.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proliferative diabetic retinopathy carries significant visual morbidity and loss to follow-up can lead to poorer visual outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the short-term impact of two systems-focused clinical initiatives directed toward reducing loss-to-follow-up and increasing pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) rates in patients with active proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in an urban, safety-net, teaching-hospital setting. The introduction of an additional weekly PRP clinic was followed by the creation of an active PDR patient registry with an appointment reminder system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, observational, retrospective cohort study between December 2022 and May 2024. We established three cohorts of encounters based on the number of eyes with active PDR in sequential order: historical controls (115 encounters) in the 8 months preceding the first intervention, increased provider PRP volume (74 encounters) over the next 4 months, and patient registry with an appointment reminder system in addition to increased provider PRP volume (65 encounters) for the following 4 months. We used linear and generalized linear mixed-effects models clustered at the patient level. Short-term process measures included the number of monthly PRP clinics, time to PRP after referral, rates of PRP and full PRP, PRP clinic adherence rate, 3-month ophthalmology clinic adherence rate, and 3-month loss-to-follow-up rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The introduction of an additional weekly PRP clinic was associated with a decrease in time from referral to PRP by 37 days (<i>p</i> < 0.001), increased odds of 3-month PRP (odds ratio [OR]: 6.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.03-14.10; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 3-month full PRP (OR: 4.66; 95% CI: 2.22-9.78; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Subsequent introduction of a patient registry/appointment reminder system was associated with decreased odds of 3-month loss-to-follow-up (OR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01-0.79; <i>p</i> < 0.05) compared to historical cohort and improved odds of 3-month ophthalmology clinic adherence (OR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.18-7.47; <i>p</i> < 0.05) compared to the increased PRP clinic cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dedicating additional clinic time for PRP and introducing a high-risk registry and reminder system were associated with improved access to care, reduced loss-to-follow-up, and increased overall clinic adherence in an urban, safety-net hospital system. Long-term visual and functional outcomes of these initiatives are an essential area of future study.</p>","PeriodicalId":100601,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13650190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hcs2.70109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Proliferative diabetic retinopathy carries significant visual morbidity and loss to follow-up can lead to poorer visual outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the short-term impact of two systems-focused clinical initiatives directed toward reducing loss-to-follow-up and increasing pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) rates in patients with active proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in an urban, safety-net, teaching-hospital setting. The introduction of an additional weekly PRP clinic was followed by the creation of an active PDR patient registry with an appointment reminder system.
Methods: This was a single-center, observational, retrospective cohort study between December 2022 and May 2024. We established three cohorts of encounters based on the number of eyes with active PDR in sequential order: historical controls (115 encounters) in the 8 months preceding the first intervention, increased provider PRP volume (74 encounters) over the next 4 months, and patient registry with an appointment reminder system in addition to increased provider PRP volume (65 encounters) for the following 4 months. We used linear and generalized linear mixed-effects models clustered at the patient level. Short-term process measures included the number of monthly PRP clinics, time to PRP after referral, rates of PRP and full PRP, PRP clinic adherence rate, 3-month ophthalmology clinic adherence rate, and 3-month loss-to-follow-up rate.
Results: The introduction of an additional weekly PRP clinic was associated with a decrease in time from referral to PRP by 37 days (p < 0.001), increased odds of 3-month PRP (odds ratio [OR]: 6.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.03-14.10; p < 0.001) and 3-month full PRP (OR: 4.66; 95% CI: 2.22-9.78; p < 0.001). Subsequent introduction of a patient registry/appointment reminder system was associated with decreased odds of 3-month loss-to-follow-up (OR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.01-0.79; p < 0.05) compared to historical cohort and improved odds of 3-month ophthalmology clinic adherence (OR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.18-7.47; p < 0.05) compared to the increased PRP clinic cohort.
Conclusions: Dedicating additional clinic time for PRP and introducing a high-risk registry and reminder system were associated with improved access to care, reduced loss-to-follow-up, and increased overall clinic adherence in an urban, safety-net hospital system. Long-term visual and functional outcomes of these initiatives are an essential area of future study.