Parthasarathy Suryanarayanan, Susanta Das, Shreyans Sethi, Kenneth M Merz, Joseph A Morrone
{"title":"Predicting Collision Cross Sections with GRACE: Geometric Residual Adduct Conditioning via Early-fusion.","authors":"Parthasarathy Suryanarayanan, Susanta Das, Shreyans Sethi, Kenneth M Merz, Joseph A Morrone","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collision cross section (CCS), derived from ion mobility mass spectrometry, is a common descriptor for molecular annotation. Prediction is challenging for machine learning models because it reflects the size, shape, and ionization state of a gas-phase molecular ion. Most predictors either ignore explicit 3D structure or treat adduct identity as a late categorical feature, which limits their ability to capture adduct-dependent geometric effects. We present GRACE (Geometric Residual Adduct Conditioning via Early-fusion), a 3D CCS predictor that adapts a pretrained molecular geometry encoder using geometric residual adduct conditioning via early fusion. GRACE combines two inductive biases: a residual objective relative to an adduct-aware physical descriptor baseline and adduct conditioning within the encoder via a learned adduct token and low-rank attention adapters. We evaluate the model on a curated set of over 9,000 experimental molecule-adduct CCS records with random, scaffold, and adduct-sensitive splits designed to separate interpolation, scaffold generalization, and adduct-driven generalization. GRACE achieves the best mean percentage difference among the evaluated learned models on all three splits: 1.67% on the random split, 2.11% on the scaffold split, and 2.36% on the adduct-sensitive split. Diagnostic analyses suggest that residual learning stabilizes training by removing the dominant mass-CCS trend, while early fusion improves adduct-sensitive prediction relative to late fusion. Across four independent external test sets, GRACE shows consistently lower error than the other evaluated models. On a held-out set, GRACE also attains the lowest mean percent difference when compared with four previously reported physics-based workflows. These results support residual learning and encoder-level adduct conditioning as practical inductive biases for fast, accurate CCS prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":93888,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13648773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Collision cross section (CCS), derived from ion mobility mass spectrometry, is a common descriptor for molecular annotation. Prediction is challenging for machine learning models because it reflects the size, shape, and ionization state of a gas-phase molecular ion. Most predictors either ignore explicit 3D structure or treat adduct identity as a late categorical feature, which limits their ability to capture adduct-dependent geometric effects. We present GRACE (Geometric Residual Adduct Conditioning via Early-fusion), a 3D CCS predictor that adapts a pretrained molecular geometry encoder using geometric residual adduct conditioning via early fusion. GRACE combines two inductive biases: a residual objective relative to an adduct-aware physical descriptor baseline and adduct conditioning within the encoder via a learned adduct token and low-rank attention adapters. We evaluate the model on a curated set of over 9,000 experimental molecule-adduct CCS records with random, scaffold, and adduct-sensitive splits designed to separate interpolation, scaffold generalization, and adduct-driven generalization. GRACE achieves the best mean percentage difference among the evaluated learned models on all three splits: 1.67% on the random split, 2.11% on the scaffold split, and 2.36% on the adduct-sensitive split. Diagnostic analyses suggest that residual learning stabilizes training by removing the dominant mass-CCS trend, while early fusion improves adduct-sensitive prediction relative to late fusion. Across four independent external test sets, GRACE shows consistently lower error than the other evaluated models. On a held-out set, GRACE also attains the lowest mean percent difference when compared with four previously reported physics-based workflows. These results support residual learning and encoder-level adduct conditioning as practical inductive biases for fast, accurate CCS prediction.