Nanomechanics of mandible wear in insects.

IF 9.6
Dilanka I Deegala, Jonathan G Pattrick, David Labonte
{"title":"Nanomechanics of mandible wear in insects.","authors":"Dilanka I Deegala, Jonathan G Pattrick, David Labonte","doi":"10.1016/j.actbio.2026.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many animals rely on specialised mouthparts to process food. Because this is a mechanically demanding task, mouthparts often wear, with potentially serious consequences for feeding performance and thus fitness. The biomechanics of wear are therefore of clear biological relevance, but remain poorly understood, especially in insects, where conventional engineering wear tests are hard to implement. Here, we present a nanomechanical characterisation of the mandibular epicuticle of three insect species: two leaf-cutting specialists, one with and one without transition-metal inclusions, and an omnivore. Contrary to predictions from simple engineering wear theory, wear resistance was neither directly proportional to indentation hardness nor inversely proportional to wear load. We suggest that this discrepancy arises in part from the high hardness-to-modulus ratio of mandibular epicuticle, which renders indentation hardness a poor proxy for resistance to plastic deformation. A simple elasto-plastic wear model qualitatively captures the main discrepancies between experiment and theory, and points to a revised set of wear proxies that may allow at least a qualitative ranking of biological materials via iso-performance lines on Ashby plots. Yet, as with most wear models, the wear coefficient remains unpredictable, a limitation strikingly illustrated by the increase in epicuticular wear resistance upon hydration despite a decrease in both hardness and modulus. Together, these observations suggest that purely plastic wear models may often be inadequate for biological materials with a high hardness-to-modulus ratio, and that even elasto-plastic models require careful validation against experimental wear assays. Significance statement Wear limits the functional lifespan of biological tools; however, quantifying, let alone predicting, wear in small, heterogeneous materials is often challenging. In this study, we directly measure nanoscale wear in insect mandibular cuticle and compare our findings with predictions derived from common mechanical wear models. Because of its high hardness-to- modulus ratio, insect epicuticle-like many biomaterials-exhibits an elasto-plastic mechanical response, which can be captured by extending existing approaches with a lumped-parameter elasto-plastic model. The agreement between the model and experiment reveals why using standard proxies can yield even qualitatively incorrect wear rankings and suggests updated elasto-plastic metrics for comparing wear resistance across cuticles and other polymeric biomaterials.</p>","PeriodicalId":93848,"journal":{"name":"Acta biomaterialia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta biomaterialia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2026.10.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many animals rely on specialised mouthparts to process food. Because this is a mechanically demanding task, mouthparts often wear, with potentially serious consequences for feeding performance and thus fitness. The biomechanics of wear are therefore of clear biological relevance, but remain poorly understood, especially in insects, where conventional engineering wear tests are hard to implement. Here, we present a nanomechanical characterisation of the mandibular epicuticle of three insect species: two leaf-cutting specialists, one with and one without transition-metal inclusions, and an omnivore. Contrary to predictions from simple engineering wear theory, wear resistance was neither directly proportional to indentation hardness nor inversely proportional to wear load. We suggest that this discrepancy arises in part from the high hardness-to-modulus ratio of mandibular epicuticle, which renders indentation hardness a poor proxy for resistance to plastic deformation. A simple elasto-plastic wear model qualitatively captures the main discrepancies between experiment and theory, and points to a revised set of wear proxies that may allow at least a qualitative ranking of biological materials via iso-performance lines on Ashby plots. Yet, as with most wear models, the wear coefficient remains unpredictable, a limitation strikingly illustrated by the increase in epicuticular wear resistance upon hydration despite a decrease in both hardness and modulus. Together, these observations suggest that purely plastic wear models may often be inadequate for biological materials with a high hardness-to-modulus ratio, and that even elasto-plastic models require careful validation against experimental wear assays. Significance statement Wear limits the functional lifespan of biological tools; however, quantifying, let alone predicting, wear in small, heterogeneous materials is often challenging. In this study, we directly measure nanoscale wear in insect mandibular cuticle and compare our findings with predictions derived from common mechanical wear models. Because of its high hardness-to- modulus ratio, insect epicuticle-like many biomaterials-exhibits an elasto-plastic mechanical response, which can be captured by extending existing approaches with a lumped-parameter elasto-plastic model. The agreement between the model and experiment reveals why using standard proxies can yield even qualitatively incorrect wear rankings and suggests updated elasto-plastic metrics for comparing wear resistance across cuticles and other polymeric biomaterials.

昆虫下颌骨磨损的纳米力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书