{"title":"A harmonized SNOMED Clinical Terms components quality assurance framework.","authors":"Dennis H Lee, Simon R Minshall, Francis Y Lau","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocag158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to construct a harmonized SNOMED Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) components quality assurance framework for identifying, categorizing, and assessing data quality issues in SNOMED CT components.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We constructed the framework through an iterative process that analyzed SNOMED CT's core components, synthesized quality factors from prior literature, reviewed inactivation reasons, and SNOMED CT release validation framework, and refined error categories through a targeted review of SNOMED CT error studies. The framework was tested using a case study evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting harmonized SNOMED CT components quality assurance framework consists of 2 dimensions: (1) SNOMED CT core components (concept, description, subtype relationships, attribute relationships) and (2) quality factors (clarity, conciseness, consistency, correctness, comprehensive domain coverage, currency, completeness, conformance). The quality factors were also defined by error categories (omission, commission).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The framework integrates previously reported quality factors, SNOMED CT inactivation reasons, release validation methods, and includes component-specific error definitions to standardize how quality issues are categorized and assessed. It extends prior frameworks, supports consistent terminology governance, enables measurable quality indicators, and provides a structured foundation for auditing methods and comparative evaluation across SNOMED CT versions and releases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The harmonized framework provides a common vocabulary and structure for describing and classifying quality issues in SNOMED CT. It can guide the development and comparison of auditing methods, support terminology governance, and inform quality-improvement activities undertaken by SNOMED International and national release centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to construct a harmonized SNOMED Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) components quality assurance framework for identifying, categorizing, and assessing data quality issues in SNOMED CT components.
Materials and methods: We constructed the framework through an iterative process that analyzed SNOMED CT's core components, synthesized quality factors from prior literature, reviewed inactivation reasons, and SNOMED CT release validation framework, and refined error categories through a targeted review of SNOMED CT error studies. The framework was tested using a case study evaluation.
Results: The resulting harmonized SNOMED CT components quality assurance framework consists of 2 dimensions: (1) SNOMED CT core components (concept, description, subtype relationships, attribute relationships) and (2) quality factors (clarity, conciseness, consistency, correctness, comprehensive domain coverage, currency, completeness, conformance). The quality factors were also defined by error categories (omission, commission).
Discussion: The framework integrates previously reported quality factors, SNOMED CT inactivation reasons, release validation methods, and includes component-specific error definitions to standardize how quality issues are categorized and assessed. It extends prior frameworks, supports consistent terminology governance, enables measurable quality indicators, and provides a structured foundation for auditing methods and comparative evaluation across SNOMED CT versions and releases.
Conclusion: The harmonized framework provides a common vocabulary and structure for describing and classifying quality issues in SNOMED CT. It can guide the development and comparison of auditing methods, support terminology governance, and inform quality-improvement activities undertaken by SNOMED International and national release centers.
期刊介绍:
JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.