A harmonized SNOMED Clinical Terms components quality assurance framework.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Dennis H Lee, Simon R Minshall, Francis Y Lau
{"title":"A harmonized SNOMED Clinical Terms components quality assurance framework.","authors":"Dennis H Lee, Simon R Minshall, Francis Y Lau","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocag158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to construct a harmonized SNOMED Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) components quality assurance framework for identifying, categorizing, and assessing data quality issues in SNOMED CT components.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We constructed the framework through an iterative process that analyzed SNOMED CT's core components, synthesized quality factors from prior literature, reviewed inactivation reasons, and SNOMED CT release validation framework, and refined error categories through a targeted review of SNOMED CT error studies. The framework was tested using a case study evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The resulting harmonized SNOMED CT components quality assurance framework consists of 2 dimensions: (1) SNOMED CT core components (concept, description, subtype relationships, attribute relationships) and (2) quality factors (clarity, conciseness, consistency, correctness, comprehensive domain coverage, currency, completeness, conformance). The quality factors were also defined by error categories (omission, commission).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The framework integrates previously reported quality factors, SNOMED CT inactivation reasons, release validation methods, and includes component-specific error definitions to standardize how quality issues are categorized and assessed. It extends prior frameworks, supports consistent terminology governance, enables measurable quality indicators, and provides a structured foundation for auditing methods and comparative evaluation across SNOMED CT versions and releases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The harmonized framework provides a common vocabulary and structure for describing and classifying quality issues in SNOMED CT. It can guide the development and comparison of auditing methods, support terminology governance, and inform quality-improvement activities undertaken by SNOMED International and national release centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to construct a harmonized SNOMED Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) components quality assurance framework for identifying, categorizing, and assessing data quality issues in SNOMED CT components.

Materials and methods: We constructed the framework through an iterative process that analyzed SNOMED CT's core components, synthesized quality factors from prior literature, reviewed inactivation reasons, and SNOMED CT release validation framework, and refined error categories through a targeted review of SNOMED CT error studies. The framework was tested using a case study evaluation.

Results: The resulting harmonized SNOMED CT components quality assurance framework consists of 2 dimensions: (1) SNOMED CT core components (concept, description, subtype relationships, attribute relationships) and (2) quality factors (clarity, conciseness, consistency, correctness, comprehensive domain coverage, currency, completeness, conformance). The quality factors were also defined by error categories (omission, commission).

Discussion: The framework integrates previously reported quality factors, SNOMED CT inactivation reasons, release validation methods, and includes component-specific error definitions to standardize how quality issues are categorized and assessed. It extends prior frameworks, supports consistent terminology governance, enables measurable quality indicators, and provides a structured foundation for auditing methods and comparative evaluation across SNOMED CT versions and releases.

Conclusion: The harmonized framework provides a common vocabulary and structure for describing and classifying quality issues in SNOMED CT. It can guide the development and comparison of auditing methods, support terminology governance, and inform quality-improvement activities undertaken by SNOMED International and national release centers.

一个统一的SNOMED临床术语组成部分质量保证框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书