Erum Siddiqui, Noor Ahmad, Simrn Majid, Maryam Ayesha, Marium Khan, Arshia Arif Janjua, Shamyl Zehra, Daniyal Rashid, Sajida Batool, Hajra Fatima, Roheen Raza, Ayesha Masood, Misheezable Ishaq, Muhammad Saad Khan, Syed Hassan Ali, Aminath Waafira
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Asundexian in Cardiovascular Diseases, Updated Systemic Review and Meta Analysis.","authors":"Erum Siddiqui, Noor Ahmad, Simrn Majid, Maryam Ayesha, Marium Khan, Arshia Arif Janjua, Shamyl Zehra, Daniyal Rashid, Sajida Batool, Hajra Fatima, Roheen Raza, Ayesha Masood, Misheezable Ishaq, Muhammad Saad Khan, Syed Hassan Ali, Aminath Waafira","doi":"10.1177/10760296261496962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThromboembolic events remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular diseases. Asundexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor, has been proposed to reduce thrombosis while minimizing bleeding risk. The recent OCEANIC-STROKE trial provided substantial new evidence. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis incorporating this large trial.MethodsPubMed, Scopus, embase and CENTRAL were searched through April 2026. Five RCTs (n=31,301) comparing asundexian 50 mg daily with placebo or apixaban in patients with AF, acute myocardial infarction or stroke were included. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, stroke or systemic embolism, ISTH-defined major bleeding, other bleeding events, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsFive RCTs involving 31,301 participants were included. Asundexian did not significantly affect all-cause mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.14), ischemic stroke (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.66-2.66) or stroke/systemic embolism (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.28-5.12). No significant differences were observed in major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, minor bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, adverse events or serious adverse events. Sensitivity analyses reduced heterogeneity and suggested a lower risk of stroke/systemic embolism (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.84), while other findings remained unchanged.ConclusionsAsundexian demonstrated a favorable safety profile but did not significantly reduce mortality or ischemic stroke. Sensitivity analyses suggest a potential benefit in reducing stroke or systemic embolism without increasing bleeding risk. Further trials are needed to identify patient populations most likely to benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":520590,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","volume":"32 ","pages":"10760296261496962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296261496962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThromboembolic events remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular diseases. Asundexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor, has been proposed to reduce thrombosis while minimizing bleeding risk. The recent OCEANIC-STROKE trial provided substantial new evidence. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis incorporating this large trial.MethodsPubMed, Scopus, embase and CENTRAL were searched through April 2026. Five RCTs (n=31,301) comparing asundexian 50 mg daily with placebo or apixaban in patients with AF, acute myocardial infarction or stroke were included. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, stroke or systemic embolism, ISTH-defined major bleeding, other bleeding events, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsFive RCTs involving 31,301 participants were included. Asundexian did not significantly affect all-cause mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.14), ischemic stroke (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.66-2.66) or stroke/systemic embolism (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.28-5.12). No significant differences were observed in major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, minor bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, adverse events or serious adverse events. Sensitivity analyses reduced heterogeneity and suggested a lower risk of stroke/systemic embolism (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.84), while other findings remained unchanged.ConclusionsAsundexian demonstrated a favorable safety profile but did not significantly reduce mortality or ischemic stroke. Sensitivity analyses suggest a potential benefit in reducing stroke or systemic embolism without increasing bleeding risk. Further trials are needed to identify patient populations most likely to benefit.