Liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine thoracic paravertebral block for thoracoscopic atrial septal defect repair: analgesic efficacy and cardiac biomarker outcomes in a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2026-09-30 Epub Date: 2026-09-24 DOI:10.21037/jtd-2026-1135
Bingqian Li, Yuxin Gao, Jingjing Han, Yan Li, Yu Chen
{"title":"Liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine thoracic paravertebral block for thoracoscopic atrial septal defect repair: analgesic efficacy and cardiac biomarker outcomes in a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized trial.","authors":"Bingqian Li, Yuxin Gao, Jingjing Han, Yan Li, Yu Chen","doi":"10.21037/jtd-2026-1135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracoscopic atrial septal defect (ASD) repair, although minimally invasive, can cause substantial postoperative pain. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) provides effective chest wall analgesia, and liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a long-acting local anesthetic with sustained release, may prolong analgesic duration. We investigated whether ultrasound-guided TPVB using long-acting LB improves postoperative analgesia without compromising cardiovascular safety compared with ropivacaine (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, assessor-blinded trial enrolled 94 patients undergoing thoracoscopic ASD repair, who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ultrasound-guided TPVB with either LB or RP. Eligibility criteria included age 18-55 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II-III, New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-III, and ejection fraction (EF) >50%. Randomization was computer-generated with sealed envelopes. Safety monitoring included continuous electrocardiography (ECG) for arrhythmias, with Clavien-Dindo grading and Naranjo causality assessment. The primary endpoint was the numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) pain score during coughing at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included NRS scores at other time points, 72-h opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents, MME), time to first rescue analgesia, extended analgesia outcomes [postoperative days 4-7 (POD4-POD7)], perioperative hemodynamics, postoperative recovery, cardiac/inflammatory biomarker trajectories, and adverse events (with postoperative arrhythmias analyzed separately).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline demographic, clinical, and intraoperative variables were well-balanced between groups (all P>0.05). Compared with RP, LB was associated with lower NRS pain scores at rest and during coughing from extubation through 72 h (all P<0.05), including the primary endpoint at 24 h. LB significantly reduced 72-h opioid consumption [median interquartile range (IQR) 7.5 (0, 42) mg <i>vs.</i> 45 (30, 67.5) mg; P<0.001] and increased the proportion of patients requiring no rescue analgesia within 72 h (72.4% <i>vs.</i> 27.6%; P=0.003). Time to first rescue analgesia was numerically longer with LB (20.5 h <i>vs.</i> 12.0 h; P=0.10), and opioid-sparing effects persisted on POD4-POD7 (both P<0.001). Mechanical ventilation duration was shorter in the LB group [5 (3, 6) h <i>vs.</i> 6 (4, 7.5) h; P=0.03]. Cardiac and inflammatory biomarker trajectories did not differ between groups. Non-arrhythmic adverse events were comparable, and postoperative arrhythmia incidence within 30 days was similar between groups (13.3% <i>vs.</i> 15.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adults undergoing thoracoscopic ASD repair, LB-based TPVB provides superior early analgesia with sustained opioid sparing and shorter mechanical ventilation duration, without signals of increased cardiovascular risk, including postoperative arrhythmias. These findings support considering LB-TPVB as part of multimodal analgesia for thoracoscopic ASD repair, pending confirmation in larger multicenter studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2500112278, retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on November 12, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":"18 9","pages":"1049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13655817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-2026-1135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thoracoscopic atrial septal defect (ASD) repair, although minimally invasive, can cause substantial postoperative pain. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) provides effective chest wall analgesia, and liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a long-acting local anesthetic with sustained release, may prolong analgesic duration. We investigated whether ultrasound-guided TPVB using long-acting LB improves postoperative analgesia without compromising cardiovascular safety compared with ropivacaine (RP).

Methods: This randomized, assessor-blinded trial enrolled 94 patients undergoing thoracoscopic ASD repair, who were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ultrasound-guided TPVB with either LB or RP. Eligibility criteria included age 18-55 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II-III, New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-III, and ejection fraction (EF) >50%. Randomization was computer-generated with sealed envelopes. Safety monitoring included continuous electrocardiography (ECG) for arrhythmias, with Clavien-Dindo grading and Naranjo causality assessment. The primary endpoint was the numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) pain score during coughing at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included NRS scores at other time points, 72-h opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalents, MME), time to first rescue analgesia, extended analgesia outcomes [postoperative days 4-7 (POD4-POD7)], perioperative hemodynamics, postoperative recovery, cardiac/inflammatory biomarker trajectories, and adverse events (with postoperative arrhythmias analyzed separately).

Results: Baseline demographic, clinical, and intraoperative variables were well-balanced between groups (all P>0.05). Compared with RP, LB was associated with lower NRS pain scores at rest and during coughing from extubation through 72 h (all P<0.05), including the primary endpoint at 24 h. LB significantly reduced 72-h opioid consumption [median interquartile range (IQR) 7.5 (0, 42) mg vs. 45 (30, 67.5) mg; P<0.001] and increased the proportion of patients requiring no rescue analgesia within 72 h (72.4% vs. 27.6%; P=0.003). Time to first rescue analgesia was numerically longer with LB (20.5 h vs. 12.0 h; P=0.10), and opioid-sparing effects persisted on POD4-POD7 (both P<0.001). Mechanical ventilation duration was shorter in the LB group [5 (3, 6) h vs. 6 (4, 7.5) h; P=0.03]. Cardiac and inflammatory biomarker trajectories did not differ between groups. Non-arrhythmic adverse events were comparable, and postoperative arrhythmia incidence within 30 days was similar between groups (13.3% vs. 15.6%).

Conclusions: In adults undergoing thoracoscopic ASD repair, LB-based TPVB provides superior early analgesia with sustained opioid sparing and shorter mechanical ventilation duration, without signals of increased cardiovascular risk, including postoperative arrhythmias. These findings support considering LB-TPVB as part of multimodal analgesia for thoracoscopic ASD repair, pending confirmation in larger multicenter studies.

Trial registration: ChiCTR2500112278, retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on November 12, 2025.

布比卡因脂质体与罗哌卡因椎旁阻滞用于胸腔镜房间隔缺损修复:一项单中心、评估盲、随机试验的镇痛疗效和心脏生物标志物结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书