Circulating Extracellular Matrix Biomarkers in the Detection of Carcinoid Heart Disease.

Tobias Stemann Lau, Elisavet Angeli, Riina Karoliina Oksjoki, Vibeke Guldbrand Rasmussen, Federica Genovese, Linda Skibsted Kornerup, Henning Grønbæk, Gitte Dam
{"title":"Circulating Extracellular Matrix Biomarkers in the Detection of Carcinoid Heart Disease.","authors":"Tobias Stemann Lau, Elisavet Angeli, Riina Karoliina Oksjoki, Vibeke Guldbrand Rasmussen, Federica Genovese, Linda Skibsted Kornerup, Henning Grønbæk, Gitte Dam","doi":"10.1530/EO-26-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a severe fibrotic complication affecting cardiac valves in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Early detection is crucial to improve prognosis. The value of the recommended screening biomarker, NT-proBNP, is uncertain. Biomarkers reflecting extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling may capture early fibrogenesis. We aimed to evaluate circulating ECM biomarkers for detection of CHD and to compare their performance with NT-proBNP.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we prospectively included patients with disseminated small intestinal NEN (siNEN). We performed transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for CHD diagnosis, and blood samples were analyzed for 10 ECM biomarkers. Biomarker levels were compared between patients with and without CHD, and diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 98 patients, 16 (16%) had CHD. PRO-C3 levels were significantly elevated in patients with CHD compared with patients without CHD (median 19.3 ng/ml (IQR: 15.6-24.0) vs 14.3 ng/ml (IQR: 12.4-17.5), p = 0.002). The AUROC of PRO-C3 for CHD detection was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90). At a cut-off level of 15.4 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 85 %, the specificity 56 %, the positive predictive value 27 %, and the negative predictive value 95 %. In the direct comparison between PRO-C3 and NT-proBNP, PRO-C3 did not outperform NT-proBNP (p = 0.09).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRO-C3, reflecting collagen type III formation, demonstrated good performance in CHD detection and may represent a complementary or potentially earlier marker than NT-proBNP. However, the performance of PRO-C3 was insufficient as a stand-alone tool, and further evaluation and exploration of new biomarkers in larger cohorts is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":72907,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EO-26-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a severe fibrotic complication affecting cardiac valves in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Early detection is crucial to improve prognosis. The value of the recommended screening biomarker, NT-proBNP, is uncertain. Biomarkers reflecting extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling may capture early fibrogenesis. We aimed to evaluate circulating ECM biomarkers for detection of CHD and to compare their performance with NT-proBNP.

Design and methods: In this cross-sectional study, we prospectively included patients with disseminated small intestinal NEN (siNEN). We performed transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for CHD diagnosis, and blood samples were analyzed for 10 ECM biomarkers. Biomarker levels were compared between patients with and without CHD, and diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC).

Results: Among 98 patients, 16 (16%) had CHD. PRO-C3 levels were significantly elevated in patients with CHD compared with patients without CHD (median 19.3 ng/ml (IQR: 15.6-24.0) vs 14.3 ng/ml (IQR: 12.4-17.5), p = 0.002). The AUROC of PRO-C3 for CHD detection was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90). At a cut-off level of 15.4 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 85 %, the specificity 56 %, the positive predictive value 27 %, and the negative predictive value 95 %. In the direct comparison between PRO-C3 and NT-proBNP, PRO-C3 did not outperform NT-proBNP (p = 0.09).

Conclusion: PRO-C3, reflecting collagen type III formation, demonstrated good performance in CHD detection and may represent a complementary or potentially earlier marker than NT-proBNP. However, the performance of PRO-C3 was insufficient as a stand-alone tool, and further evaluation and exploration of new biomarkers in larger cohorts is required.

循环细胞外基质生物标志物在类癌性心脏病检测中的应用
目的:类癌性心脏病(CHD)是影响神经内分泌肿瘤(NEN)患者心脏瓣膜的严重纤维化并发症。早期发现对改善预后至关重要。推荐的筛选生物标志物NT-proBNP的价值尚不确定。反映细胞外基质(ECM)重塑的生物标志物可能捕获早期纤维形成。我们的目的是评估循环ECM生物标志物对冠心病的检测,并将其与NT-proBNP的性能进行比较。设计和方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们前瞻性地纳入了弥散性小肠NEN (siNEN)患者。我们进行了经胸超声心动图(TTE)诊断冠心病,并分析了血液样本中的10种ECM生物标志物。比较冠心病患者和非冠心病患者的生物标志物水平,并使用受试者操作特征下面积(AUROC)评估诊断效果。结果:98例患者中有16例(16%)患有冠心病。与非冠心病患者相比,冠心病患者PRO-C3水平显著升高(中位数19.3 ng/ml (IQR: 15.6-24.0) vs 14.3 ng/ml (IQR: 12.4-17.5), p = 0.002)。PRO-C3检测冠心病的AUROC为0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90)。在15.4 ng/ml的临界值下,敏感性为85%,特异性为56%,阳性预测值为27%,阴性预测值为95%。在PRO-C3与NT-proBNP的直接比较中,PRO-C3并不优于NT-proBNP (p = 0.09)。结论:反映III型胶原形成的PRO-C3在冠心病检测中表现良好,可能是NT-proBNP的补充或可能更早的标志物。然而,PRO-C3作为一种独立工具的性能是不够的,需要在更大的队列中进一步评估和探索新的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书