Rachel Clarke, Molly Day, Mia Drew, Lauren Budd, Marie Bromberg, Jasmine Martinez
{"title":"\"I got a bit of closure\": A thematic analysis of experiences of attending a post intensive care multidisciplinary follow up clinic.","authors":"Rachel Clarke, Molly Day, Mia Drew, Lauren Budd, Marie Bromberg, Jasmine Martinez","doi":"10.1177/17511437261493291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of critical illness is recognised; however, interventions to support optimal recovery post-ICU are less clear. There is no single accepted model of follow-up services and an uncertain evidence base.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thematic analysis was used to analyse semi-structured interviews with 27 ICU-survivors from an ICU in the southwest of Britain on their experience of attending a multi-disciplinary (MDT) follow up clinic. The participants' follow up clinic letters were reviewed to identify related actions by team members.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight themes emerged from the data: gaining understanding, family involvement, addressing the future, safe space to explore experiences, clinic structure, virtual versus face-to-face appointments, and perception of staff. Clinic letters evidence a range of onwards referrals and provision of advice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants valued the MDT follow up clinic. The option to attend in person or virtually increased accessibility. The opportunity to enhance understanding of critical care related experiences and integrate this with self identity and ongoing recovery processes was meaningful for patients. Several participants were referred for further medical and psychological intervention. Patient experience and need should be at the heart of informing potential outcome measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437261493291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13650057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437261493291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The impact of critical illness is recognised; however, interventions to support optimal recovery post-ICU are less clear. There is no single accepted model of follow-up services and an uncertain evidence base.
Methods: Thematic analysis was used to analyse semi-structured interviews with 27 ICU-survivors from an ICU in the southwest of Britain on their experience of attending a multi-disciplinary (MDT) follow up clinic. The participants' follow up clinic letters were reviewed to identify related actions by team members.
Results: Eight themes emerged from the data: gaining understanding, family involvement, addressing the future, safe space to explore experiences, clinic structure, virtual versus face-to-face appointments, and perception of staff. Clinic letters evidence a range of onwards referrals and provision of advice.
Conclusion: Participants valued the MDT follow up clinic. The option to attend in person or virtually increased accessibility. The opportunity to enhance understanding of critical care related experiences and integrate this with self identity and ongoing recovery processes was meaningful for patients. Several participants were referred for further medical and psychological intervention. Patient experience and need should be at the heart of informing potential outcome measurement.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.