Saving the Limb-Tissue Collectors, Growth Factors, and Antibiotics in a War Injury.

IF 0.9
Eleftherios Papaeleftheriou, Andrea Sowislok, Alexander Wegner, Marcel Haversath, Marcus Jäger
{"title":"Saving the Limb-Tissue Collectors, Growth Factors, and Antibiotics in a War Injury.","authors":"Eleftherios Papaeleftheriou, Andrea Sowislok, Alexander Wegner, Marcel Haversath, Marcus Jäger","doi":"10.1055/a-2972-3247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>As a life-saving procedure, limb amputation is frequently indicated in severe war injuries, especially in suboptimal medical supply. We report of a 56-year-old Ukrainian male who was wounded on the battlefield by an air attack during Russian early invasion in Zaporizhzhia. The blast injury caused a critical soft-tissue defect of the lower leg combined with comminuted fractures of the tibia and fibula. Although indicated, the patient refused the amputation of the lower leg. Initially closed reduction and stabilization by an external fixator, local debridement as well as soft-tissue coverage by a porcine skin were performed at a local field hospital. Due to destroyed infrastructure and missing escape corridors, further evacuation was difficult. Thus, it took 15 days to transfer the patient by ground transportation to our institution. Based on the massive tissue loss, superinfection necrosis and questionable blood supply, the indication for amputation was confirmed, but the patient insisted on limb preservation. To save the lower leg, a brought spectrum of regenerative strategies was applied, accompanied by standard trauma treatment regimens (debridement, vacuum sealing, antibiotics, intramedullary nailing, suralis flap).</p><p><strong>Abstract: </strong>These included the local application of growth factors, the use of innovative tissue collectors, the implementation of biomaterial/tissue combinations and the application of a vasodilator. Six months after treatment, the patient was free of pain and infection. However, further follow-up was complicated by delayed bone healing and required revision surgery. Although the limb was saved, it ultimately took 1 year until full rehabilitation was achieved. This case illustrates the special demands in war lower leg injuries but also demonstrates that a combination of standardized and innovative treatment protocols can save a limb, even when amputation might be indicated as a first-line therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94274,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2972-3247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: As a life-saving procedure, limb amputation is frequently indicated in severe war injuries, especially in suboptimal medical supply. We report of a 56-year-old Ukrainian male who was wounded on the battlefield by an air attack during Russian early invasion in Zaporizhzhia. The blast injury caused a critical soft-tissue defect of the lower leg combined with comminuted fractures of the tibia and fibula. Although indicated, the patient refused the amputation of the lower leg. Initially closed reduction and stabilization by an external fixator, local debridement as well as soft-tissue coverage by a porcine skin were performed at a local field hospital. Due to destroyed infrastructure and missing escape corridors, further evacuation was difficult. Thus, it took 15 days to transfer the patient by ground transportation to our institution. Based on the massive tissue loss, superinfection necrosis and questionable blood supply, the indication for amputation was confirmed, but the patient insisted on limb preservation. To save the lower leg, a brought spectrum of regenerative strategies was applied, accompanied by standard trauma treatment regimens (debridement, vacuum sealing, antibiotics, intramedullary nailing, suralis flap).

Abstract: These included the local application of growth factors, the use of innovative tissue collectors, the implementation of biomaterial/tissue combinations and the application of a vasodilator. Six months after treatment, the patient was free of pain and infection. However, further follow-up was complicated by delayed bone healing and required revision surgery. Although the limb was saved, it ultimately took 1 year until full rehabilitation was achieved. This case illustrates the special demands in war lower leg injuries but also demonstrates that a combination of standardized and innovative treatment protocols can save a limb, even when amputation might be indicated as a first-line therapy.

拯救肢体组织收集器,生长因子和抗生素在战争伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书