Untargeted Urinary Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Metabolic Signatures Associated with Anhedonia Severity-Stratified Subgroups in Major Depressive Disorder.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Pub Date : 2026-10-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/NDT.S647919
Shoucui Xia, Jun Cheng, Guoqing Gao, Qingqing Zhao, Wenzhi Pei, Long Chen, Xulai Zhang
{"title":"Untargeted Urinary Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Metabolic Signatures Associated with Anhedonia Severity-Stratified Subgroups in Major Depressive Disorder.","authors":"Shoucui Xia, Jun Cheng, Guoqing Gao, Qingqing Zhao, Wenzhi Pei, Long Chen, Xulai Zhang","doi":"10.2147/NDT.S647919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate urinary metabolite differences between subgroups stratified by anhedonia severity in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and identify potential biomarkers associated with anhedonia using untargeted metabolomic profiling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five MDD patients were recruited and stratified by median Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) total score into Low-SHAPS (n=32) and High-SHAPS (n=23) groups, along with 35 healthy controls (HC). Urinary metabolomic profiling was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Differential metabolites were identified using one-way ANOVA for multi-group comparisons and independent-sample <i>t</i>-tests for pairwise comparisons, followed by multivariate statistical analyses and pathway enrichment analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-group ANOVA identified 706 nominally differential metabolites (P < 0.05), of which 115 reached P < 0.01. The contrast between Low-SHAPS and High-SHAPS groups showed the most pronounced differences, with 1608 metabolites reaching nominal significance (P < 0.05). OPLS-DA models demonstrated significant discriminative ability across all pairwise comparisons after permutation testing (Low vs High: cross-validated AUC = 0.726, P = 0.010; Low vs HC: cross-validated AUC = 0.886, P = 0.010; High vs HC: cross-validated AUC = 0.901, P = 0.010). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed significant alterations in tryptophan metabolism and phenylalanine metabolism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDD patients with differing degrees of anhedonia exhibit widespread urinary metabolic differences. The greater metabolic divergence between High-SHAPS and Low-SHAPS subgroups compared with patient-control comparisons suggests that anhedonia contributes substantially to metabolic heterogeneity in depression. SHAPS-based stratification offers novel metabolomic evidence for precision subtyping and biomarker discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19378,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment","volume":"22 ","pages":"647919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13654294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S647919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate urinary metabolite differences between subgroups stratified by anhedonia severity in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and identify potential biomarkers associated with anhedonia using untargeted metabolomic profiling.

Methods: Fifty-five MDD patients were recruited and stratified by median Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) total score into Low-SHAPS (n=32) and High-SHAPS (n=23) groups, along with 35 healthy controls (HC). Urinary metabolomic profiling was performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Differential metabolites were identified using one-way ANOVA for multi-group comparisons and independent-sample t-tests for pairwise comparisons, followed by multivariate statistical analyses and pathway enrichment analysis.

Results: Three-group ANOVA identified 706 nominally differential metabolites (P < 0.05), of which 115 reached P < 0.01. The contrast between Low-SHAPS and High-SHAPS groups showed the most pronounced differences, with 1608 metabolites reaching nominal significance (P < 0.05). OPLS-DA models demonstrated significant discriminative ability across all pairwise comparisons after permutation testing (Low vs High: cross-validated AUC = 0.726, P = 0.010; Low vs HC: cross-validated AUC = 0.886, P = 0.010; High vs HC: cross-validated AUC = 0.901, P = 0.010). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed significant alterations in tryptophan metabolism and phenylalanine metabolism.

Conclusions: MDD patients with differing degrees of anhedonia exhibit widespread urinary metabolic differences. The greater metabolic divergence between High-SHAPS and Low-SHAPS subgroups compared with patient-control comparisons suggests that anhedonia contributes substantially to metabolic heterogeneity in depression. SHAPS-based stratification offers novel metabolomic evidence for precision subtyping and biomarker discovery.

非靶向尿代谢组学分析揭示了与重度抑郁症快感缺乏严重程度分层亚组相关的代谢特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
328
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical or pre-clinical studies on a range of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书