Improving Professional Billing Practices in a Pediatric Hospital Medicine Section.

IF 2.2 Q1 Nursing
Jimin Lee, Hadley Brighton, Nicole E Kelly, Snezana Nena Osorio, Erika McHugh, Erika L Abramson
{"title":"Improving Professional Billing Practices in a Pediatric Hospital Medicine Section.","authors":"Jimin Lee, Hadley Brighton, Nicole E Kelly, Snezana Nena Osorio, Erika McHugh, Erika L Abramson","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2026-009612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional billing translates clinical complexity and physician work into Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and work relative value units (wRVUs), which inform reimbursement and resource planning. Pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) involves complex, cognitive, and time-intensive care, making accurate documentation and code selection essential. Baseline data in our PHM section suggested underuse of appropriate codes, contributing to undercapture of physician work. We aimed to increase wRVUs per patient-day by 25% over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quality improvement initiative at an academic children's hospital from March 2024 to February 2025. Key drivers were billing knowledge, standardized documentation, workflows, and shared culture around billing. The primary outcome was wRVUs per patient-day; the secondary outcome was professional revenue. Process measures included targeted CPT code use. Balancing measures included coding, denial, or compliance concerns identified by the Revenue and Compliance team. Four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles tested education, a billing guide, documentation tools, and billing data feedback. Statistical process control charts identified special cause variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 23 772 CPT codes. Mean wRVUs per patient-day increased from 1.9 to 2.5, a 32% increase sustained through December 2025. Professional revenue increased 31% during intervention and 40% during sustainability. Use of level 3 initial inpatient care codes increased from 11% to 58%, level 3 subsequent inpatient care codes from 12% to 54%, and prolonged discharge codes from 13% to 42%. Neonatal intensive care and critical care code use increased. No denial or compliance concerns were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A section-wide quality improvement approach improved capture of physician work and professional revenue without billing or compliance concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2026-009612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Professional billing translates clinical complexity and physician work into Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and work relative value units (wRVUs), which inform reimbursement and resource planning. Pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) involves complex, cognitive, and time-intensive care, making accurate documentation and code selection essential. Baseline data in our PHM section suggested underuse of appropriate codes, contributing to undercapture of physician work. We aimed to increase wRVUs per patient-day by 25% over 12 months.

Methods: We conducted a quality improvement initiative at an academic children's hospital from March 2024 to February 2025. Key drivers were billing knowledge, standardized documentation, workflows, and shared culture around billing. The primary outcome was wRVUs per patient-day; the secondary outcome was professional revenue. Process measures included targeted CPT code use. Balancing measures included coding, denial, or compliance concerns identified by the Revenue and Compliance team. Four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles tested education, a billing guide, documentation tools, and billing data feedback. Statistical process control charts identified special cause variation.

Results: We analyzed 23 772 CPT codes. Mean wRVUs per patient-day increased from 1.9 to 2.5, a 32% increase sustained through December 2025. Professional revenue increased 31% during intervention and 40% during sustainability. Use of level 3 initial inpatient care codes increased from 11% to 58%, level 3 subsequent inpatient care codes from 12% to 54%, and prolonged discharge codes from 13% to 42%. Neonatal intensive care and critical care code use increased. No denial or compliance concerns were identified.

Conclusions: A section-wide quality improvement approach improved capture of physician work and professional revenue without billing or compliance concerns.

改进儿科医院医学部的专业计费做法。
背景:专业计费将临床复杂性和医生工作转化为当前程序术语(CPT)代码和工作相对价值单位(wRVUs),为报销和资源规划提供信息。儿科医院医学(PHM)涉及复杂、认知和耗时的护理,因此准确的文档和代码选择至关重要。我们PHM部分的基线数据表明,适当代码的使用不足,导致医生工作的不足。我们的目标是在12个月内将每个患者每天的wrv增加25%。方法:我们于2024年3月至2025年2月在某学院型儿童医院开展了质量改进活动。关键驱动因素是计费知识、标准化文档、工作流程和围绕计费的共享文化。主要结局指标为每患者日wrvu;第二个结果是专业收入。过程度量包括目标CPT代码的使用。平衡措施包括编码、拒绝或由收益和遵从性团队确定的遵从性问题。四个计划-执行-研究-行动周期测试了教育、计费指南、文档工具和计费数据反馈。统计过程控制图确定了特殊原因变化。结果:我们分析了23 772个CPT编码。每个病人每天的平均wrv从1.9增加到2.5,到2025年12月持续增长32%。专业收入在干预期间增加了31%,在可持续发展期间增加了40%。3级初始住院护理代码的使用从11%增加到58%,3级后续住院护理代码从12%增加到54%,延长出院代码从13%增加到42%。新生儿重症监护和重症监护代码的使用增加。没有发现拒绝或遵从性问题。结论:全科范围的质量改进方法改善了医生工作和专业收入的获取,而没有计费或合规问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书