Comparison of endoscopic and radiologic drainage for symptomatic postoperative pancreatic fistula-associated collections after distal pancreatectomy.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Charlotte Rondé-Roupie, Safi Dokmak, Louis Romengas, Béatrice Aussilhou, Paul Rivallin, Gabriel Marcellier, Marco Dioguardi Burgio, Jeanne Dembinski, Vinciane Rebours, Frédéric Prat, Alain Sauvanet
{"title":"Comparison of endoscopic and radiologic drainage for symptomatic postoperative pancreatic fistula-associated collections after distal pancreatectomy.","authors":"Charlotte Rondé-Roupie, Safi Dokmak, Louis Romengas, Béatrice Aussilhou, Paul Rivallin, Gabriel Marcellier, Marco Dioguardi Burgio, Jeanne Dembinski, Vinciane Rebours, Frédéric Prat, Alain Sauvanet","doi":"10.1007/s00464-026-13497-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After distal pancreatectomy (DP), symptomatic postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF)-associated collections are common and lead to readmissions. The choice of drainage modality remains debated. This study compared endoscopic and radiologic drainage as first-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included patients undergoing DP with or without splenectomy from 2012 to 2024. Patients who underwent DP with a concomitant digestive or vascular procedure or pancreatic anastomosis were excluded. The primary outcome was total hospital stay, defined as the sum of the index hospitalization and readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 607 patients, 124 (20.4%) had POPF, including 94 (15.5%) with a symptomatic collection. Of these, 25 underwent endoscopic drainage (lumen-apposing metal stent, n = 19; double-pigtail stent, n = 6), 12 underwent radiologic drainage, and 57 received another treatment (medical treatment alone, n = 35; drain tract recanalization, n = 15; surgical reoperation, n = 4; endoscopic sphincterotomy, n = 3). The endoscopic and radiologic drainage groups were comparable, except for collection location adjacent to the pancreatic transection margin (endoscopic: 92% vs radiologic: 50%; p = 0.008). Total hospital stay within 90 days was shorter after endoscopic drainage (19 vs 31 days; p = 0.023), with no deaths within 90 days. The clinical success rate was higher after endoscopic drainage (76% vs 50%; p = 0.15), whereas drainage dysfunction was more frequent after radiologic drainage (17% vs 4%; p = 0.2). Four severe complications occurred: three after endoscopic drainage using a LAMS, including two hemorrhagic complications, and one after radiologic drainage. In univariable analysis, collection location adjacent to the pancreatic transection margin and endoscopic drainage were associated with shorter total hospital stay within 90 days (β = - 17 days; 95% CI - 29 to - 4.2; p = 0.010 and β = - 13 days; 95% CI - 24 to - 1.6; p = 0.026, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After DP, first-line endoscopic drainage of symptomatic POPF-associated collections was associated with a shorter total hospital stay and a trend toward a higher clinical success rate but may carry a risk of bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13497-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After distal pancreatectomy (DP), symptomatic postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF)-associated collections are common and lead to readmissions. The choice of drainage modality remains debated. This study compared endoscopic and radiologic drainage as first-line treatment.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients undergoing DP with or without splenectomy from 2012 to 2024. Patients who underwent DP with a concomitant digestive or vascular procedure or pancreatic anastomosis were excluded. The primary outcome was total hospital stay, defined as the sum of the index hospitalization and readmissions.

Results: Among 607 patients, 124 (20.4%) had POPF, including 94 (15.5%) with a symptomatic collection. Of these, 25 underwent endoscopic drainage (lumen-apposing metal stent, n = 19; double-pigtail stent, n = 6), 12 underwent radiologic drainage, and 57 received another treatment (medical treatment alone, n = 35; drain tract recanalization, n = 15; surgical reoperation, n = 4; endoscopic sphincterotomy, n = 3). The endoscopic and radiologic drainage groups were comparable, except for collection location adjacent to the pancreatic transection margin (endoscopic: 92% vs radiologic: 50%; p = 0.008). Total hospital stay within 90 days was shorter after endoscopic drainage (19 vs 31 days; p = 0.023), with no deaths within 90 days. The clinical success rate was higher after endoscopic drainage (76% vs 50%; p = 0.15), whereas drainage dysfunction was more frequent after radiologic drainage (17% vs 4%; p = 0.2). Four severe complications occurred: three after endoscopic drainage using a LAMS, including two hemorrhagic complications, and one after radiologic drainage. In univariable analysis, collection location adjacent to the pancreatic transection margin and endoscopic drainage were associated with shorter total hospital stay within 90 days (β = - 17 days; 95% CI - 29 to - 4.2; p = 0.010 and β = - 13 days; 95% CI - 24 to - 1.6; p = 0.026, respectively).

Conclusions: After DP, first-line endoscopic drainage of symptomatic POPF-associated collections was associated with a shorter total hospital stay and a trend toward a higher clinical success rate but may carry a risk of bleeding.

远端胰腺切除术后症状性胰瘘相关收藏品的内镜与放射引流的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书