Development, Pilot Testing, and Preliminary Validation of a Parenteral Nutrition Macronutrient Assessment Tool

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Andrew E. Adorno, Carol Ireton-Jones, Mindy A. Patterson
{"title":"Development, Pilot Testing, and Preliminary Validation of a Parenteral Nutrition Macronutrient Assessment Tool","authors":"Andrew E. Adorno,&nbsp;Carol Ireton-Jones,&nbsp;Mindy A. Patterson","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Parenteral nutrition is an intravenous form of nutrition support for patients unable to meet nutritional needs through the gastrointestinal tract. While guidelines exist for parenteral nutrition macronutrient prescription, variability in clinical practices highlights the need for an assessment tool to evaluate clinician decision-making. This study aimed to develop, pilot test, and perform preliminary validation of a parenteral nutrition macronutrient assessment tool in a sample of clinicians to evaluate prescribing practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eight clinical scenario-based questions were developed and refined through expert testing and feedback. Reliability and validity were assessed with experienced clinicians (<i>n</i> = 7, mean 18.3 years of experience) and early-career clinicians (<i>n</i> = 4, mean 2.8 years of experience) involved in parenteral nutrition prescribing. Test-retest reliability and paired samples <i>t</i>-tests were used for statistical analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Test-retest reliability was strong (<i>R</i> or <i>r<sub>s</sub></i> &gt; 0.7), with dextrose prescribing showing the highest consistency. Questions with lower reliability were refined based on participant feedback, and refinements were assessed descriptively through pilot tester evaluation. Tool favorability ratings improved from 4.3/5 (86%) to 4.9/5 (98%) following revisions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The parenteral nutrition macronutrient assessment tool demonstrated preliminary evidence of reliability and content validity in assessing prescribing practices. Refinements enhanced favorability, clarity, and perceived clinical relevance. The survey tool may be useful for identifying practice variability and informing educational interventions to improve parenteral nutrition prescribing. Further evaluation in larger and more diverse clinician populations is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.70365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Parenteral nutrition is an intravenous form of nutrition support for patients unable to meet nutritional needs through the gastrointestinal tract. While guidelines exist for parenteral nutrition macronutrient prescription, variability in clinical practices highlights the need for an assessment tool to evaluate clinician decision-making. This study aimed to develop, pilot test, and perform preliminary validation of a parenteral nutrition macronutrient assessment tool in a sample of clinicians to evaluate prescribing practices.

Methods

Eight clinical scenario-based questions were developed and refined through expert testing and feedback. Reliability and validity were assessed with experienced clinicians (n = 7, mean 18.3 years of experience) and early-career clinicians (n = 4, mean 2.8 years of experience) involved in parenteral nutrition prescribing. Test-retest reliability and paired samples t-tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Test-retest reliability was strong (R or rs > 0.7), with dextrose prescribing showing the highest consistency. Questions with lower reliability were refined based on participant feedback, and refinements were assessed descriptively through pilot tester evaluation. Tool favorability ratings improved from 4.3/5 (86%) to 4.9/5 (98%) following revisions.

Conclusions

The parenteral nutrition macronutrient assessment tool demonstrated preliminary evidence of reliability and content validity in assessing prescribing practices. Refinements enhanced favorability, clarity, and perceived clinical relevance. The survey tool may be useful for identifying practice variability and informing educational interventions to improve parenteral nutrition prescribing. Further evaluation in larger and more diverse clinician populations is warranted.

肠外营养宏量营养素评估工具的开发、试点测试和初步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书