Intravascular bullet embolization: a multicenter three-case series and literature review.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1097/RC9.0000000000000933
Carlos Andres Muñoz, Adolfo González Hadad, Alejandro Burgos, José Julián Serna, Diego Rivera Arbeláez, Juan Pablo Carbonell
{"title":"Intravascular bullet embolization: a multicenter three-case series and literature review.","authors":"Carlos Andres Muñoz, Adolfo González Hadad, Alejandro Burgos, José Julián Serna, Diego Rivera Arbeláez, Juan Pablo Carbonell","doi":"10.1097/RC9.0000000000000933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and importance: </strong>Intravascular bullet embolization (IBE) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of penetrating trauma. It may present as either arterial or venous embolization and is most commonly associated with low-velocity, small-caliber gunshot wounds (GSWs). Diagnosis is often challenging, and management remains controversial because of the limited evidence available to guide therapeutic decision-making.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We present a multicenter case series of three patients with venous bullet embolization treated using a hybrid endovascular-surgical approach. In all three cases, the projectile was successfully captured using endovascular techniques; however, definitive retrieval required a venotomy because of the projectile's diameter. All three patients had favorable clinical outcomes, with no procedure-related complications and complete functional recovery during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Clinical discussion: </strong>IBE should be suspected when the number of entry and exit wounds is inconsistent with the expected ballistic trajectory. Imaging studies play a pivotal role in confirming the diagnosis and in planning the therapeutic strategy. Although management remains controversial and should be individualized, advances in endovascular techniques have expanded the minimally invasive options for foreign-body retrieval. Our case series illustrates that although endovascular capture of the projectile may be technically feasible, definitive retrieval may still require a venotomy when the projectile's diameter precludes endovascular removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IBE is a rare complication of penetrating trauma that requires a high index of clinical suspicion for timely diagnosis. When technically feasible and supported by appropriate expertise and resources, an endovascular approach may be considered as an initial retrieval strategy. Management should be individualized according to the type of embolization, projectile characteristics, anatomical location, the patient's clinical condition, and the anticipated risk-benefit balance of intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48113,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","volume":"138 10","pages":"3996-4010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13652397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RC9.0000000000000933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and importance: Intravascular bullet embolization (IBE) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of penetrating trauma. It may present as either arterial or venous embolization and is most commonly associated with low-velocity, small-caliber gunshot wounds (GSWs). Diagnosis is often challenging, and management remains controversial because of the limited evidence available to guide therapeutic decision-making.

Case presentation: We present a multicenter case series of three patients with venous bullet embolization treated using a hybrid endovascular-surgical approach. In all three cases, the projectile was successfully captured using endovascular techniques; however, definitive retrieval required a venotomy because of the projectile's diameter. All three patients had favorable clinical outcomes, with no procedure-related complications and complete functional recovery during follow-up.

Clinical discussion: IBE should be suspected when the number of entry and exit wounds is inconsistent with the expected ballistic trajectory. Imaging studies play a pivotal role in confirming the diagnosis and in planning the therapeutic strategy. Although management remains controversial and should be individualized, advances in endovascular techniques have expanded the minimally invasive options for foreign-body retrieval. Our case series illustrates that although endovascular capture of the projectile may be technically feasible, definitive retrieval may still require a venotomy when the projectile's diameter precludes endovascular removal.

Conclusion: IBE is a rare complication of penetrating trauma that requires a high index of clinical suspicion for timely diagnosis. When technically feasible and supported by appropriate expertise and resources, an endovascular approach may be considered as an initial retrieval strategy. Management should be individualized according to the type of embolization, projectile characteristics, anatomical location, the patient's clinical condition, and the anticipated risk-benefit balance of intervention.

血管内子弹栓塞:一个多中心的三例系列和文献回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1116
审稿时长
46 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书