{"title":"Impact of voxel size on hand dose calculations and dose-area histogram analysis for radiopharmaceutical operators.","authors":"Yuma Matsuki, Kosuke Yamashita, Takeshi Ohno","doi":"10.1007/s12194-026-01151-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the impact of voxel size on three-dimensional (3D) hand dose distributions and maximum dose estimates for radiopharmaceutical operators and examined the relationship between dose-area histogram (DAH) indices and the maximum mean skin dose over 1 cm² ([Formula: see text]). Dose distributions in a hand phantom during administration with a shielded syringe containing <sup>99m</sup>Tc, <sup>177</sup>Lu, or <sup>18</sup>F were calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. The hand phantom voxel size was varied from 1 to 5 mm, and skin-dose distributions on the finger surface were calculated using 1 mm × 1 mm × 10 μm voxels placed at a depth of 70 μm. DAHs and [Formula: see text] were evaluated for the index finger, middle finger, and thumb. With a 1 mm voxel size, the maximum dose occurred in the index and middle fingers for all radionuclides. At larger voxel sizes, dose underestimation due to the partial-volume effect was more pronounced in these fingers, where the dose gradient was steep, and the maximum-dose region shifted to the thumb at voxel sizes of 4 mm for <sup>99m</sup>Tc and <sup>177</sup>Lu and 5 mm for <sup>18</sup>F. Under most conditions, the minimum dose covering 0.6 cm² ([Formula: see text]) agreed with [Formula: see text] within ± 5%. These results indicate that the smallest feasible voxel size should be used for hand dose calculations, particularly for lower radionuclide energy and smaller source volume. DAH analysis may provide a simple and robust approach for estimating [Formula: see text] and assessing radiation-induced skin injury risk while accounting for the area effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-026-01151-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated the impact of voxel size on three-dimensional (3D) hand dose distributions and maximum dose estimates for radiopharmaceutical operators and examined the relationship between dose-area histogram (DAH) indices and the maximum mean skin dose over 1 cm² ([Formula: see text]). Dose distributions in a hand phantom during administration with a shielded syringe containing 99mTc, 177Lu, or 18F were calculated using Monte Carlo simulations. The hand phantom voxel size was varied from 1 to 5 mm, and skin-dose distributions on the finger surface were calculated using 1 mm × 1 mm × 10 μm voxels placed at a depth of 70 μm. DAHs and [Formula: see text] were evaluated for the index finger, middle finger, and thumb. With a 1 mm voxel size, the maximum dose occurred in the index and middle fingers for all radionuclides. At larger voxel sizes, dose underestimation due to the partial-volume effect was more pronounced in these fingers, where the dose gradient was steep, and the maximum-dose region shifted to the thumb at voxel sizes of 4 mm for 99mTc and 177Lu and 5 mm for 18F. Under most conditions, the minimum dose covering 0.6 cm² ([Formula: see text]) agreed with [Formula: see text] within ± 5%. These results indicate that the smallest feasible voxel size should be used for hand dose calculations, particularly for lower radionuclide energy and smaller source volume. DAH analysis may provide a simple and robust approach for estimating [Formula: see text] and assessing radiation-induced skin injury risk while accounting for the area effect.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.