Ka Ora Telecare, a national after-hours telehealth service for rural Aotearoa New Zealand: a descriptive cross-sectional evaluation with particular attention to equity of access and outcomes.
{"title":"Ka Ora Telecare, a national after-hours telehealth service for rural Aotearoa New Zealand: a descriptive cross-sectional evaluation with particular attention to equity of access and outcomes.","authors":"Steven Lillis, Lara Oertly","doi":"10.1071/HC26147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rural communities in Aotearoa New Zealand have reduced access to primary care, particularly after hours, with greater impact on Māori, Pacific peoples and those in areas of higher deprivation. Ka Ora Telecare is a national after-hours telehealth service established to address these gaps without replacing local services.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to describe service use and clinical outcomes for Ka Ora, with attention to rurality, ethnicity and socioeconomic position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive evaluation of routinely collected, de-identified, aggregated service data, with the consultation as the unit of analysis, was performed. Variables were ethnicity (prioritised), age band, Community Services Card status, deprivation quintile, rurality by the Geographical Classification for Health (GCH), provider type and clinical outcome. Analysis was descriptive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 24 month study period, 69,337 consultations carried a valid GCH code: 63.1% in R1 (rural, close to an urban centre), 27.1% in R2 and 5.6% in R3. Māori representation fell from 22.5% in R1 to 16.8% in R3, and Pacific from 3.8% to 1.1%. Of 16,369 clinician-led consultations, 88% were resolved or partially resolved via telehealth and 8% required same-day escalation. Outcomes were similar across ethnic groups, and Māori and Pacific use was concentrated in higher deprivation quintiles.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Ka Ora is functioning as a useful component of the rural primary care system, reaching higher-deprivation populations. Use is concentrated in less remote rural communities, and Māori and Pacific representation declines with remoteness even though Māori form a larger share of the population in more remote areas. Whether use is proportionate to need cannot be determined from service-level data.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC26147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Rural communities in Aotearoa New Zealand have reduced access to primary care, particularly after hours, with greater impact on Māori, Pacific peoples and those in areas of higher deprivation. Ka Ora Telecare is a national after-hours telehealth service established to address these gaps without replacing local services.
Aim: This study aims to describe service use and clinical outcomes for Ka Ora, with attention to rurality, ethnicity and socioeconomic position.
Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive evaluation of routinely collected, de-identified, aggregated service data, with the consultation as the unit of analysis, was performed. Variables were ethnicity (prioritised), age band, Community Services Card status, deprivation quintile, rurality by the Geographical Classification for Health (GCH), provider type and clinical outcome. Analysis was descriptive.
Results: Across the 24 month study period, 69,337 consultations carried a valid GCH code: 63.1% in R1 (rural, close to an urban centre), 27.1% in R2 and 5.6% in R3. Māori representation fell from 22.5% in R1 to 16.8% in R3, and Pacific from 3.8% to 1.1%. Of 16,369 clinician-led consultations, 88% were resolved or partially resolved via telehealth and 8% required same-day escalation. Outcomes were similar across ethnic groups, and Māori and Pacific use was concentrated in higher deprivation quintiles.
Discussion: Ka Ora is functioning as a useful component of the rural primary care system, reaching higher-deprivation populations. Use is concentrated in less remote rural communities, and Māori and Pacific representation declines with remoteness even though Māori form a larger share of the population in more remote areas. Whether use is proportionate to need cannot be determined from service-level data.
Ka Ora Telecare,为新西兰奥特罗阿农村地区提供的国家非工作时间远程保健服务:一项描述性横断面评价,特别关注公平获取和成果。
导言:新西兰奥特罗阿的农村社区获得初级保健的机会减少了,特别是在工作时间之外,这对Māori、太平洋人民和贫困程度较高地区的人民产生了更大的影响。Ka Ora Telecare是一项全国性的下班后远程保健服务,目的是在不取代当地服务的情况下解决这些差距。目的:本研究旨在描述卡奥拉的服务使用和临床结果,并关注农村,种族和社会经济地位。方法:以咨询为分析单位,对常规收集的、去识别的、汇总的服务数据进行横断面描述性评估。变量包括种族(优先考虑)、年龄组、社区服务卡状况、贫困五分位数、按健康地理分类(GCH)划分的农村状况、提供者类型和临床结果。分析是描述性的。结果:在24个月的研究期间,69,337次咨询携带有效的GCH代码:R1为63.1%(农村,靠近城市中心),R2为27.1%,R3为5.6%。Māori的比例从R1的22.5%下降到R3的16.8%,太平洋从3.8%下降到1.1%。在16,369个由临床医生主导的咨询中,88%通过远程医疗解决或部分解决,8%需要当天升级。不同种族群体的结果相似,Māori和太平洋地区的使用集中在贫困程度较高的五分之一。讨论:Ka Ora是农村初级保健系统的一个有用组成部分,服务于贫困程度较高的人群。使用集中在较不偏远的农村社区,尽管Māori在较偏远地区的人口中所占比例较大,但Māori和太平洋地区的比例随着偏远程度而下降。使用是否与需求成比例不能从服务级别数据中确定。