Assessing the quality of end-of-life care in systemic sclerosis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Julie McDonald, Lisa Kiven, Sophia To, Navera Ahmed, Laura Ross
{"title":"Assessing the quality of end-of-life care in systemic sclerosis.","authors":"Julie McDonald, Lisa Kiven, Sophia To, Navera Ahmed, Laura Ross","doi":"10.1111/imj.70652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease with the highest mortality among rheumatic diseases, yet little is known about the quality of end-of-life care in SSc.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate end-of-life care in SSc against the Australian National Consensus Statement's Essential Elements for high-quality end-of-life care and compare care between palliative care unit (PCU) and non-PCU deaths.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-centre study included adults with SSc who died between 2013 and 2023 at a tertiary SSc referral centre. Terminal admission records for expected deaths were mapped to the National Consensus domains. Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests compared PCU and non-PCU deaths.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three patients died. Six unexpected deaths were excluded, leaving 15 PCU and 12 non-PCU deaths. Multidisciplinary involvement was extensive, particularly from rheumatology and allied health. Palliative care engagement was common, goals of care were frequently reviewed and communication about dying with next-of-kin occurred in most cases. Patients dying outside the PCU had lower rates of documented recognition of dying, significantly greater intensive care involvement and more frequent medical emergency team calls. They also received more potentially non-beneficial investigations and treatments during the final 48 h of life and incurred substantially higher terminal admission costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>End-of-life care in SSc was broadly consistent with the National Consensus standards, identifying strong rheumatology involvement, multidisciplinary care and frequent palliative care referral. However, differences in care according to site of death highlight opportunities to increase proactive palliative care involvement and regular review of goals of care to ensure high-quality end-of-life care across all settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease with the highest mortality among rheumatic diseases, yet little is known about the quality of end-of-life care in SSc.

Aims: To evaluate end-of-life care in SSc against the Australian National Consensus Statement's Essential Elements for high-quality end-of-life care and compare care between palliative care unit (PCU) and non-PCU deaths.

Methods: This retrospective single-centre study included adults with SSc who died between 2013 and 2023 at a tertiary SSc referral centre. Terminal admission records for expected deaths were mapped to the National Consensus domains. Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney U tests compared PCU and non-PCU deaths.

Results: Thirty-three patients died. Six unexpected deaths were excluded, leaving 15 PCU and 12 non-PCU deaths. Multidisciplinary involvement was extensive, particularly from rheumatology and allied health. Palliative care engagement was common, goals of care were frequently reviewed and communication about dying with next-of-kin occurred in most cases. Patients dying outside the PCU had lower rates of documented recognition of dying, significantly greater intensive care involvement and more frequent medical emergency team calls. They also received more potentially non-beneficial investigations and treatments during the final 48 h of life and incurred substantially higher terminal admission costs.

Conclusion: End-of-life care in SSc was broadly consistent with the National Consensus standards, identifying strong rheumatology involvement, multidisciplinary care and frequent palliative care referral. However, differences in care according to site of death highlight opportunities to increase proactive palliative care involvement and regular review of goals of care to ensure high-quality end-of-life care across all settings.

评估系统性硬化症患者临终关怀的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书