Comparative transcriptional network analysis reveals ecological specialization in infant-associated species of Bifidobacterium.

IF 5.2 2区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
mSystems Pub Date : 2026-10-12 DOI:10.1128/msystems.01082-26
Felipe Melis-Arcos, Masanori Arita, Daniel Garrido
{"title":"Comparative transcriptional network analysis reveals ecological specialization in infant-associated species of <i>Bifidobacterium</i>.","authors":"Felipe Melis-Arcos, Masanori Arita, Daniel Garrido","doi":"10.1128/msystems.01082-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Bifidobacterium</i> species are important microorganisms in the infant gut microbiota displaying substantial genomic diversity, yet how this variability is reflected in transcriptional regulatory architecture remains an open question. Here, we integrated pangenome analysis with transcription factor binding site inference and network-based approaches to compare regulatory architectures across <i>Bifidobacterium longum</i> subsp. <i>infantis</i>, <i>Bifidobacterium breve</i>, and <i>B. longum</i> subsp. <i>longum</i> using over 300 high-quality genomes. All three species exhibited open pangenomes, with regulatory interactions frequently involving accessory genes. Inferred network metrics were compared with score-randomized controls across motif-score thresholds. Increasing score stringency reduced network size while increasing the number of detected communities, indicating greater fragmentation of the retained networks rather than a measured increase in modularity. <i>NrdR</i> showed an intermediate overlap in the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) category sets represented among its predicted targets and species-dependent target prevalence. HMO-related regulators (<i>FucR</i>, <i>NanR</i>, and <i>NagR</i>) differed descriptively between <i>Bifidobacterium infantis</i> and <i>B. breve</i>, the two species included in the complete three-regulator comparison, in predicted target counts, represented COG category sets, and genomic-prevalence patterns; only <i>FucR</i> showed a significant difference in accessory-target fraction. These findings identify species-dependent differences in predicted regulon composition and genomic prevalence and provide testable hypotheses about how regulatory architecture may relate to ecological specialization in the infant gut.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong><i>Bifidobacterium</i> species are among the most abundant microorganisms in the breast-fed infant gut microbiota, where they display distinct patterns of genomic diversification and host association. However, the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms underlying these species-specific differences remain incompletely characterized. Here, we reconstructed and compared genome-scale transcriptional regulatory networks across three infant-associated <i>Bifidobacterium</i> species, integrating pangenome structure with transcription factor binding site inference across more than 300 genomes. Our analyses identified predicted regulatory interactions involving accessory genes and species-specific differences in network structure, regulon composition, and target prevalence. These associations provide hypotheses for experimental studies of how gene content and regulatory architecture may contribute to niche adaptation. This pangenome-scale framework can support the prioritization of regulatory hypotheses for future functional studies of infant-associated <i>Bifidobacterium</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":18819,"journal":{"name":"mSystems","volume":" ","pages":"e0108226"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mSystems","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01082-26","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bifidobacterium species are important microorganisms in the infant gut microbiota displaying substantial genomic diversity, yet how this variability is reflected in transcriptional regulatory architecture remains an open question. Here, we integrated pangenome analysis with transcription factor binding site inference and network-based approaches to compare regulatory architectures across Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium breve, and B. longum subsp. longum using over 300 high-quality genomes. All three species exhibited open pangenomes, with regulatory interactions frequently involving accessory genes. Inferred network metrics were compared with score-randomized controls across motif-score thresholds. Increasing score stringency reduced network size while increasing the number of detected communities, indicating greater fragmentation of the retained networks rather than a measured increase in modularity. NrdR showed an intermediate overlap in the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) category sets represented among its predicted targets and species-dependent target prevalence. HMO-related regulators (FucR, NanR, and NagR) differed descriptively between Bifidobacterium infantis and B. breve, the two species included in the complete three-regulator comparison, in predicted target counts, represented COG category sets, and genomic-prevalence patterns; only FucR showed a significant difference in accessory-target fraction. These findings identify species-dependent differences in predicted regulon composition and genomic prevalence and provide testable hypotheses about how regulatory architecture may relate to ecological specialization in the infant gut.

Importance: Bifidobacterium species are among the most abundant microorganisms in the breast-fed infant gut microbiota, where they display distinct patterns of genomic diversification and host association. However, the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms underlying these species-specific differences remain incompletely characterized. Here, we reconstructed and compared genome-scale transcriptional regulatory networks across three infant-associated Bifidobacterium species, integrating pangenome structure with transcription factor binding site inference across more than 300 genomes. Our analyses identified predicted regulatory interactions involving accessory genes and species-specific differences in network structure, regulon composition, and target prevalence. These associations provide hypotheses for experimental studies of how gene content and regulatory architecture may contribute to niche adaptation. This pangenome-scale framework can support the prioritization of regulatory hypotheses for future functional studies of infant-associated Bifidobacterium.

比较转录网络分析揭示了双歧杆菌婴儿相关种的生态专门化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
mSystems
mSystems Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
308
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: mSystems™ will publish preeminent work that stems from applying technologies for high-throughput analyses to achieve insights into the metabolic and regulatory systems at the scale of both the single cell and microbial communities. The scope of mSystems™ encompasses all important biological and biochemical findings drawn from analyses of large data sets, as well as new computational approaches for deriving these insights. mSystems™ will welcome submissions from researchers who focus on the microbiome, genomics, metagenomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, glycomics, bioinformatics, and computational microbiology. mSystems™ will provide streamlined decisions, while carrying on ASM''s tradition of rigorous peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书