Metapersonal Care as Philosophical Health

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Luis de Miranda
{"title":"Metapersonal Care as Philosophical Health","authors":"Luis de Miranda","doi":"10.1111/jep.70666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>This paper addresses the aims of the present journal concerning health philosophy and person-centred healthcare. Person-centred care corrected the reduction of patients to bodies and pathologies, yet its interpretation and application remain somewhat inconsistent. This article locates the inconsistency in an unresolved philosophical question: which self is the person on whom care is centred. Under pressure, a person tends to default to an inherited self rather than explore their own philosophy of life, so that an expressed preference may record the default self rather than the thinking person.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To diagnose the root of the inconsistency and to articulate metapersonal care as a necessary criterion distinguishing philosophical from naive person-centred care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Conceptual and philosophical analysis, in dialogue with the person-centred care and capabilities literatures, relational conceptions of autonomy, and psychological accounts of decentring, drawing on Spinoza, Murdoch, and Foucault for the theory of self-relation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>What care records when it asks what the patient wants is often not the person but the epochal default self: the inherited configuration that presents itself as authentic precisely because it is immediate. Hence the paradox: the more immediately personal an expression, the more generic it may be. Between identifying with that configuration and bracketing it in the name of detachment, I develop a third position, <i>metapersonality</i>, the capacity to inhabit one's historically constituted personality without granting it sovereignty. Applied to care, this yields <i>metapersonal care</i>, helping the person to become capable of exploring the lived philosophy from which their preferences arise, and of reaffirming or revising them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Metapersonal care names a necessary criterion of adequate person-centred care, one that philosophical health practices are designed to serve. Its horizon is <i>eudynamia</i>, in which cultivation of the self and composition of a shared world are no longer separable ends.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"32 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

This paper addresses the aims of the present journal concerning health philosophy and person-centred healthcare. Person-centred care corrected the reduction of patients to bodies and pathologies, yet its interpretation and application remain somewhat inconsistent. This article locates the inconsistency in an unresolved philosophical question: which self is the person on whom care is centred. Under pressure, a person tends to default to an inherited self rather than explore their own philosophy of life, so that an expressed preference may record the default self rather than the thinking person.

Aims and Objectives

To diagnose the root of the inconsistency and to articulate metapersonal care as a necessary criterion distinguishing philosophical from naive person-centred care.

Methods

Conceptual and philosophical analysis, in dialogue with the person-centred care and capabilities literatures, relational conceptions of autonomy, and psychological accounts of decentring, drawing on Spinoza, Murdoch, and Foucault for the theory of self-relation.

Results

What care records when it asks what the patient wants is often not the person but the epochal default self: the inherited configuration that presents itself as authentic precisely because it is immediate. Hence the paradox: the more immediately personal an expression, the more generic it may be. Between identifying with that configuration and bracketing it in the name of detachment, I develop a third position, metapersonality, the capacity to inhabit one's historically constituted personality without granting it sovereignty. Applied to care, this yields metapersonal care, helping the person to become capable of exploring the lived philosophy from which their preferences arise, and of reaffirming or revising them.

Conclusion

Metapersonal care names a necessary criterion of adequate person-centred care, one that philosophical health practices are designed to serve. Its horizon is eudynamia, in which cultivation of the self and composition of a shared world are no longer separable ends.

作为哲学健康的超个人关怀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书