Second-order consistency for learning chaotic dynamics via randomized Jacobian matching.

IF 3.3 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Chaos Pub Date : 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1063/5.0347780
Shinhoo Kang, Hai V Nguyen, Tan Bui-Thanh
{"title":"Second-order consistency for learning chaotic dynamics via randomized Jacobian matching.","authors":"Shinhoo Kang, Hai V Nguyen, Tan Bui-Thanh","doi":"10.1063/5.0347780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Short-horizon accuracy does not ensure that a learned chaotic system has correct long-time dynamics. Trajectory (zeroth-order) matching constrains vector-field values, and Jacobian (first-order) matching constrains local tangent dynamics, but neither determines how the Jacobian varies away from supervised states. A model may be locally accurate while drifting toward spurious attractors and distorting long-time statistics. We show that second-order supervision mitigates these failures. Because forming full Hessian tensors is computationally prohibitive in high dimensions, we propose model-constrained randomized Jacobian matching, which compares the Jacobians of the true and learned vector fields at randomly perturbed inputs. A Taylor expansion shows that the expected randomized Jacobian loss decomposes into the Jacobian mismatch plus a Hessian mismatch scaled by the noise variance, implicitly enforcing second-order consistency at O(d2) memory cost without forming the O(d3) Hessian tensor. In Lorenz 63 with minimal temporal supervision, second-order supervision reduces invariant-measure error and Lyapunov-spectrum mean squared error in both paired comparisons and recovers the constant Hessian norm of the true bilinear field. Across five training seeds, explicit Hessian matching produces catastrophic Lyapunov outliers for four of five seeds, whereas randomized Jacobian matching produces none among 5000 on-attractor rollouts. It also has the largest threshold in a directional capture scan, possibly reflecting the neighborhood coverage of its perturbed inputs. In coupled Lorenz 96, first-order methods enter spurious high-amplitude regimes as forcing increases, while second-order methods retain accurate marginals. Randomized Jacobian matching costs about the same as explicit Hessian matching on Lorenz 63 and 40% less on Lorenz 96, with no reference Hessian evaluations during training.</p>","PeriodicalId":9974,"journal":{"name":"Chaos","volume":"36 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chaos","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0347780","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Short-horizon accuracy does not ensure that a learned chaotic system has correct long-time dynamics. Trajectory (zeroth-order) matching constrains vector-field values, and Jacobian (first-order) matching constrains local tangent dynamics, but neither determines how the Jacobian varies away from supervised states. A model may be locally accurate while drifting toward spurious attractors and distorting long-time statistics. We show that second-order supervision mitigates these failures. Because forming full Hessian tensors is computationally prohibitive in high dimensions, we propose model-constrained randomized Jacobian matching, which compares the Jacobians of the true and learned vector fields at randomly perturbed inputs. A Taylor expansion shows that the expected randomized Jacobian loss decomposes into the Jacobian mismatch plus a Hessian mismatch scaled by the noise variance, implicitly enforcing second-order consistency at O(d2) memory cost without forming the O(d3) Hessian tensor. In Lorenz 63 with minimal temporal supervision, second-order supervision reduces invariant-measure error and Lyapunov-spectrum mean squared error in both paired comparisons and recovers the constant Hessian norm of the true bilinear field. Across five training seeds, explicit Hessian matching produces catastrophic Lyapunov outliers for four of five seeds, whereas randomized Jacobian matching produces none among 5000 on-attractor rollouts. It also has the largest threshold in a directional capture scan, possibly reflecting the neighborhood coverage of its perturbed inputs. In coupled Lorenz 96, first-order methods enter spurious high-amplitude regimes as forcing increases, while second-order methods retain accurate marginals. Randomized Jacobian matching costs about the same as explicit Hessian matching on Lorenz 63 and 40% less on Lorenz 96, with no reference Hessian evaluations during training.

随机雅可比匹配学习混沌动力学的二阶一致性。
短视界精度不能保证学习混沌系统具有正确的长时间动力学。轨迹(零阶)匹配约束向量场值,雅可比矩阵(一阶)匹配约束局部切线动力学,但两者都不决定雅可比矩阵如何偏离监督状态。一个模型可能是局部准确的,但却倾向于虚假的吸引子并扭曲了长期统计数据。我们证明二阶监督减轻了这些失败。由于在高维情况下形成完整的Hessian张量在计算上是禁止的,我们提出了模型约束的随机雅可比匹配,它比较了在随机扰动输入下真实向量场和学习向量场的雅可比矩阵。Taylor展开表明,期望随机雅可比损失分解为雅可比失配加上由噪声方差缩放的Hessian失配,隐式地在O(d2)内存开销下强制二阶一致性,而不形成O(d3) Hessian张量。在最小时间监督的Lorenz 63中,二阶监督减小了配对比较中的不变测度误差和李雅普诺夫谱均方误差,恢复了真双线性场的恒定Hessian范数。在5个训练种子中,明确的Hessian匹配对5个种子中的4个产生灾难性的Lyapunov异常值,而随机的雅可比匹配在5000个非吸引子中没有产生异常值。它在定向捕获扫描中也有最大的阈值,可能反映了其扰动输入的邻域覆盖。在耦合的Lorenz 96中,随着强迫的增加,一阶方法进入虚假的高振幅区,而二阶方法保留精确的边际。在训练过程中没有参考Hessian评估的情况下,随机Jacobian匹配成本与Lorenz 63上的显式Hessian匹配成本大致相同,而在Lorenz 96上则减少40%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chaos
Chaos 物理-物理:数学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.80%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to increasing the understanding of nonlinear phenomena and describing the manifestations in a manner comprehensible to researchers from a broad spectrum of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书