ERMA: a harmonizing epicPCR data analysis tool.

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Adrian Dörr, Svjetlana Dekić Rozman, Lina Viktoria Duncker, Jan Kehrmann, Jan Buer, Marko Virta, Folker Meyer, Ivana Kraiselburd
{"title":"ERMA: a harmonizing epicPCR data analysis tool.","authors":"Adrian Dörr, Svjetlana Dekić Rozman, Lina Viktoria Duncker, Jan Kehrmann, Jan Buer, Marko Virta, Folker Meyer, Ivana Kraiselburd","doi":"10.1186/s12864-026-13418-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>EpicPCR links functional genes to taxonomic markers at the single-cell level and has become an important method in microbial ecology and antimicrobial resistance research. However, the lack of missing standardized data analysis workflows limits reproducibility and comparability across studies. Existing analyses are often based on custom, unpublished scripts, complicating cross-study benchmarking and reuse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present ERMA, an open-source, Snakemake-based pipeline that enables an automated, standardized, reproducible, and scalable epicPCR data analysis with minimal user input. ERMA supports both Illumina and ONT sequencing data and integrates quality control, database preparation, dual similarity searches against taxonomic and functional reference databases, results integration, filtering, and visualization. The pipeline is adaptable to a broad range of research questions beyond AMR due to modular database preparation and integration of specific UniRef queries. We evaluated ERMA using five publicly available epicPCR datasets covering diverse sample sources and sequencing depths. Across these datasets, ERMA achieved mean concordance rates of approximately 70-83% with the taxonomic results reported in the respective publications. In addition, validation using a defined five-member mock community spiked into clinical wastewater demonstrated full recovery of mock genera, with 85% of ERMA-detected genera also detected by independent 16S rDNA gene analysis of the same wastewater sample. Attrition analysis showed inconsistent filtering patterns across studies, reflecting dataset-specific quality differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While large-scale reference datasets for epicPCR remain limited, validation using both publicly available studies and a defined mock community shows strong, interpretable performance across heterogeneous datasets. By providing a transparent, modular, and reproducible workflow, ERMA contributes toward harmonized epicPCR data analysis and establishes a foundation for future methodological standardization and benchmarking efforts as reference datasets improve.</p>","PeriodicalId":9030,"journal":{"name":"BMC Genomics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13418-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: EpicPCR links functional genes to taxonomic markers at the single-cell level and has become an important method in microbial ecology and antimicrobial resistance research. However, the lack of missing standardized data analysis workflows limits reproducibility and comparability across studies. Existing analyses are often based on custom, unpublished scripts, complicating cross-study benchmarking and reuse.

Results: We present ERMA, an open-source, Snakemake-based pipeline that enables an automated, standardized, reproducible, and scalable epicPCR data analysis with minimal user input. ERMA supports both Illumina and ONT sequencing data and integrates quality control, database preparation, dual similarity searches against taxonomic and functional reference databases, results integration, filtering, and visualization. The pipeline is adaptable to a broad range of research questions beyond AMR due to modular database preparation and integration of specific UniRef queries. We evaluated ERMA using five publicly available epicPCR datasets covering diverse sample sources and sequencing depths. Across these datasets, ERMA achieved mean concordance rates of approximately 70-83% with the taxonomic results reported in the respective publications. In addition, validation using a defined five-member mock community spiked into clinical wastewater demonstrated full recovery of mock genera, with 85% of ERMA-detected genera also detected by independent 16S rDNA gene analysis of the same wastewater sample. Attrition analysis showed inconsistent filtering patterns across studies, reflecting dataset-specific quality differences.

Conclusion: While large-scale reference datasets for epicPCR remain limited, validation using both publicly available studies and a defined mock community shows strong, interpretable performance across heterogeneous datasets. By providing a transparent, modular, and reproducible workflow, ERMA contributes toward harmonized epicPCR data analysis and establishes a foundation for future methodological standardization and benchmarking efforts as reference datasets improve.

ERMA:一个统一的epicPCR数据分析工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Genomics
BMC Genomics 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
769
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: BMC Genomics is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of genome-scale analysis, functional genomics, and proteomics. BMC Genomics is part of the BMC series which publishes subject-specific journals focused on the needs of individual research communities across all areas of biology and medicine. We offer an efficient, fair and friendly peer review service, and are committed to publishing all sound science, provided that there is some advance in knowledge presented by the work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书