How Community Pharmacists Use Their Know-Who When Dispensing Medicines: A Qualitative Study

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Céline Slekovec, Louise Joly, Thierry Pelaccia
{"title":"How Community Pharmacists Use Their Know-Who When Dispensing Medicines: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Céline Slekovec,&nbsp;Louise Joly,&nbsp;Thierry Pelaccia","doi":"10.1111/jep.70664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rational</h3>\n \n <p>Recent studies indicate that physicians' and nurses' clinical reasoning partly relies on relational and contextual knowledge, known as ‘Know-Who.’</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study investigated whether community pharmacists also use ‘Know-Who’ in pharmaceutical interventions concerning antimicrobial prescriptions and how it shapes their decision-making.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This qualitative study involved face-to-face interviews with fifteen French community pharmacists. Two independent researchers analysed the data thematically using an integrative approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacists reported that their decisions relied not only on theoretical and practical knowledge but also on ‘Know-Who’—their understanding of prescribers, patients, and peers. They form implicit mental maps of prescribers based on experience, observation, and, at times, stereotypes. These maps influence confidence in prescriptions, the tailoring of counselling strategies, and the anticipation of prescribers' reactions. Patients' behaviour, understanding, and financial constraints also shape the content, duration, and tone of counselling. While initial prescription analysis was similar across staff, final decision-making was often guided by the pharmacy owner. Overall, ‘Know-Who’ complements theoretical and procedural knowledge, enabling pharmacists to evaluate information credibility, adapt communication and decisions, and anticipate reactions in contextually complex situations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Community pharmacists integrate ‘Know-Who’ with theoretical and practical knowledge to make contextually informed, patient-centered decisions. This relational dimension enables them to manage uncertainty, optimise communication, and foster effective interprofessional collaboration. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating relational and contextual knowledge into pharmacy education and training, and suggest that acknowledging the role of ‘Know-Who’ could enhance both the safety and quality of pharmaceutical care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"32 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rational

Recent studies indicate that physicians' and nurses' clinical reasoning partly relies on relational and contextual knowledge, known as ‘Know-Who.’

Aim

This study investigated whether community pharmacists also use ‘Know-Who’ in pharmaceutical interventions concerning antimicrobial prescriptions and how it shapes their decision-making.

Method

This qualitative study involved face-to-face interviews with fifteen French community pharmacists. Two independent researchers analysed the data thematically using an integrative approach.

Results

Pharmacists reported that their decisions relied not only on theoretical and practical knowledge but also on ‘Know-Who’—their understanding of prescribers, patients, and peers. They form implicit mental maps of prescribers based on experience, observation, and, at times, stereotypes. These maps influence confidence in prescriptions, the tailoring of counselling strategies, and the anticipation of prescribers' reactions. Patients' behaviour, understanding, and financial constraints also shape the content, duration, and tone of counselling. While initial prescription analysis was similar across staff, final decision-making was often guided by the pharmacy owner. Overall, ‘Know-Who’ complements theoretical and procedural knowledge, enabling pharmacists to evaluate information credibility, adapt communication and decisions, and anticipate reactions in contextually complex situations.

Conclusion

Community pharmacists integrate ‘Know-Who’ with theoretical and practical knowledge to make contextually informed, patient-centered decisions. This relational dimension enables them to manage uncertainty, optimise communication, and foster effective interprofessional collaboration. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating relational and contextual knowledge into pharmacy education and training, and suggest that acknowledging the role of ‘Know-Who’ could enhance both the safety and quality of pharmaceutical care.

社区药剂师在配药时如何使用他们的知识分子:一项定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书