Postoperative Emergence After Remimazolam- Versus Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Valve Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 1.4 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-12 DOI:10.4103/aca.aca_90_26
Emi Fujii, Yasuhiko Imashuku, Motoi Inoue, Hirotoshi Kitagawa
{"title":"Postoperative Emergence After Remimazolam- Versus Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Cardiac Valve Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Emi Fujii, Yasuhiko Imashuku, Motoi Inoue, Hirotoshi Kitagawa","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_90_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine used for general anesthesia, including cardiac surgery; however, its effect on postoperative emergence following cardiopulmonary bypass remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to compare postoperative emergence following remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>A retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We included adult patients who underwent elective cardiac valve replacement surgery at a single center between April 2023 and September 2024. Patients received either remimazolam- or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia according to institutional practice. The primary endpoint was postoperative emergence time. Secondary endpoints included time to extubation and early postoperative hemodynamic stability assessed using the vasoactive-inotropic score.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Baseline characteristics and perioperative variables were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three patients were included in the analysis (remimazolam group, n = 21; propofol group, n = 42). Postoperative emergence time did not differ significantly between the two groups (164 [120-253] min vs. 137 [95-188] min, P = 0.193). Time to extubation was also comparable between the groups (1,009 [914-1,070] min vs. 1,033 [906-1,057] min, P = 0.844). Early postoperative hemodynamic parameters, including vasoactive-inotropic scores, were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery, postoperative emergence time was comparable between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia. More prospective studies are warranted to clarify the role of remimazolam in cardiac anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":"29 4","pages":"570-576"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_90_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine used for general anesthesia, including cardiac surgery; however, its effect on postoperative emergence following cardiopulmonary bypass remains unclear.

Aims: We aimed to compare postoperative emergence following remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery.

Settings and design: A retrospective observational study.

Methods and materials: We included adult patients who underwent elective cardiac valve replacement surgery at a single center between April 2023 and September 2024. Patients received either remimazolam- or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia according to institutional practice. The primary endpoint was postoperative emergence time. Secondary endpoints included time to extubation and early postoperative hemodynamic stability assessed using the vasoactive-inotropic score.

Statistical analysis used: Baseline characteristics and perioperative variables were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed.

Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the analysis (remimazolam group, n = 21; propofol group, n = 42). Postoperative emergence time did not differ significantly between the two groups (164 [120-253] min vs. 137 [95-188] min, P = 0.193). Time to extubation was also comparable between the groups (1,009 [914-1,070] min vs. 1,033 [906-1,057] min, P = 0.844). Early postoperative hemodynamic parameters, including vasoactive-inotropic scores, were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: In adult patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery, postoperative emergence time was comparable between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia. More prospective studies are warranted to clarify the role of remimazolam in cardiac anesthesia.

心脏瓣膜手术中雷马唑仑与异丙酚全静脉麻醉的对比:一项回顾性观察研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书