Analgesic efficacy of uni-level erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Basma M El-Khalifa, Hamza Khelifa, Mahmoud Mohamed Gad, Jamal Ahmad, Hazem M Mazy, Asmaa Soliman, Eman Ayman Nada, Bahaa Elfakharany, Tarek H Elmeneizee, Israa Ahmed Qutob
{"title":"Analgesic efficacy of uni-level erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Basma M El-Khalifa, Hamza Khelifa, Mahmoud Mohamed Gad, Jamal Ahmad, Hazem M Mazy, Asmaa Soliman, Eman Ayman Nada, Bahaa Elfakharany, Tarek H Elmeneizee, Israa Ahmed Qutob","doi":"10.1186/s12871-026-04328-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery remains the cornerstone of management in breast cancer patients. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), have emerged as adjuncts to standard therapy for postoperative pain control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies comparing ESPB and standard procedure of general anesthesia and opioids were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, analgesia duration, and postoperative morphine consumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAS pain scores were significantly reduced with the ESPB group. Similarly, longer analgesia duration (MD 7.03, 95%CI 4.92, 9.14, P < 0.0001), and lower postoperative morphine consumption (MD -5.77; 95% CI, -7.89, -3.65; P < 0.0001) were observed in the ESPB group. NRS pain scores at 24 h, intraoperative fentanyl, and postoperative tramadol consumption also decreased with ESPB. No significant differences were observed for NRS scores at 12 h. However, heterogeneity was high and most of the included studies had high or unclear risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESPB may reduce opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores compared to the control groups. However, these results should be taken cautiously, due to the high risk of bias among the included studies and low certainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13659940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04328-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgery remains the cornerstone of management in breast cancer patients. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), have emerged as adjuncts to standard therapy for postoperative pain control.

Methods: Studies comparing ESPB and standard procedure of general anesthesia and opioids were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores, analgesia duration, and postoperative morphine consumption.

Results: VAS pain scores were significantly reduced with the ESPB group. Similarly, longer analgesia duration (MD 7.03, 95%CI 4.92, 9.14, P < 0.0001), and lower postoperative morphine consumption (MD -5.77; 95% CI, -7.89, -3.65; P < 0.0001) were observed in the ESPB group. NRS pain scores at 24 h, intraoperative fentanyl, and postoperative tramadol consumption also decreased with ESPB. No significant differences were observed for NRS scores at 12 h. However, heterogeneity was high and most of the included studies had high or unclear risk of bias.

Conclusion: ESPB may reduce opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores compared to the control groups. However, these results should be taken cautiously, due to the high risk of bias among the included studies and low certainty.

单水平竖肌脊柱平面阻滞在乳腺癌手术患者中的镇痛效果:系统回顾和meta分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书