From Mean to Machine Learning: Evolution and Econometric Synthesis Review of Granger Causality Methods

IF 2.3 Q2 ECONOMICS
Zhihui Lv, Xin He, Wing-Keung Wong
{"title":"From Mean to Machine Learning: Evolution and Econometric Synthesis Review of Granger Causality Methods","authors":"Zhihui Lv,&nbsp;Xin He,&nbsp;Wing-Keung Wong","doi":"10.1007/s10690-026-09635-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Granger causality remains a central framework for studying predictive causal relations in economics and finance, but its methodological scope now extends far beyond classical linear vector autoregression. Existing surveys often examine linear tests, nonlinear tests, quantile causality, distributional causality, and machine-learning-based causal discovery as separate methodological strands. This review provides an econometric synthesis that connects these strands under a common predictive-causality logic. It argues that the evolution of Granger causality can be understood through three connected dimensions: the statistical object being predicted, the dependence structure being represented, and the algorithm used for estimation and inference. Based on this logic, the review develops a distributional hierarchy from conditional means to variances, quantiles, conditional densities, full distributions, and high-dimensional machine-learning settings. It further proposes a distribution, structure, and algorithm framework for comparing traditional econometric tests, nonlinear and distributional methods, sparse high-dimensional models, graph-learning approaches, and neural-network-based Granger causality. A bibliometric analysis of 2,170 Web of Science records from 2010 to 2025 complements the methodological review by identifying source-journal patterns, country-level contributions, co-citation clusters, keyword evolution, and recent shifts toward nonlinear, network-based, and data-driven causal analysis. The review also provides a method-software mapping that links empirical objectives to implementation tools in Stata, EViews, MATLAB, R, and Python. A central conclusion is that machine-learning approaches expand the scope of Granger-causality analysis, but their value depends on formal validation, robustness to structural breaks, post-selection assessment, and interpretable causal attribution. The paper contributes a critical and practical framework for selecting, implementing, and interpreting Granger-causality methods in modern macroeconomic and financial research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54095,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Financial Markets","volume":"33 4","pages":"1445 - 1485"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10690-026-09635-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Granger causality remains a central framework for studying predictive causal relations in economics and finance, but its methodological scope now extends far beyond classical linear vector autoregression. Existing surveys often examine linear tests, nonlinear tests, quantile causality, distributional causality, and machine-learning-based causal discovery as separate methodological strands. This review provides an econometric synthesis that connects these strands under a common predictive-causality logic. It argues that the evolution of Granger causality can be understood through three connected dimensions: the statistical object being predicted, the dependence structure being represented, and the algorithm used for estimation and inference. Based on this logic, the review develops a distributional hierarchy from conditional means to variances, quantiles, conditional densities, full distributions, and high-dimensional machine-learning settings. It further proposes a distribution, structure, and algorithm framework for comparing traditional econometric tests, nonlinear and distributional methods, sparse high-dimensional models, graph-learning approaches, and neural-network-based Granger causality. A bibliometric analysis of 2,170 Web of Science records from 2010 to 2025 complements the methodological review by identifying source-journal patterns, country-level contributions, co-citation clusters, keyword evolution, and recent shifts toward nonlinear, network-based, and data-driven causal analysis. The review also provides a method-software mapping that links empirical objectives to implementation tools in Stata, EViews, MATLAB, R, and Python. A central conclusion is that machine-learning approaches expand the scope of Granger-causality analysis, but their value depends on formal validation, robustness to structural breaks, post-selection assessment, and interpretable causal attribution. The paper contributes a critical and practical framework for selecting, implementing, and interpreting Granger-causality methods in modern macroeconomic and financial research.

从均值到机器学习:格兰杰因果关系方法的演化与计量经济学综合综述
格兰杰因果关系仍然是研究经济和金融预测因果关系的核心框架,但其方法范围现在远远超出了经典的线性向量自回归。现有的调查通常将线性测试、非线性测试、分位数因果关系、分布因果关系和基于机器学习的因果发现作为单独的方法链进行检查。这篇综述提供了一个计量经济学综合,连接这些股在一个共同的预测因果关系逻辑。本文认为格兰杰因果关系的演化可以通过三个相互联系的维度来理解:被预测的统计对象、被表示的依赖结构以及用于估计和推理的算法。基于这种逻辑,本文开发了一个分布层次结构,从条件均值到方差、分位数、条件密度、完整分布和高维机器学习设置。它进一步提出了一个分布、结构和算法框架,用于比较传统的计量检验、非线性和分布方法、稀疏高维模型、图学习方法和基于神经网络的格兰杰因果关系。对2010年至2025年2170份Web of Science记录的文献计量学分析通过确定来源期刊模式、国家层面的贡献、共被引集群、关键词演变以及最近向非线性、基于网络和数据驱动的因果分析的转变来补充方法综述。该综述还提供了一种方法-软件映射,将经验目标与Stata, EViews, MATLAB, R和Python中的实现工具联系起来。一个核心结论是,机器学习方法扩大了格兰杰因果分析的范围,但它们的价值取决于形式验证、对结构断裂的稳健性、选择后评估和可解释的因果归因。本文为在现代宏观经济和金融研究中选择、实施和解释格兰杰因果关系方法提供了一个关键而实用的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The current remarkable growth in the Asia-Pacific financial markets is certain to continue. These markets are expected to play a further important role in the world capital markets for investment and risk management. In accordance with this development, Asia-Pacific Financial Markets (formerly Financial Engineering and the Japanese Markets), the official journal of the Japanese Association of Financial Econometrics and Engineering (JAFEE), is expected to provide an international forum for researchers and practitioners in academia, industry, and government, who engage in empirical and/or theoretical research into the financial markets. We invite submission of quality papers on all aspects of finance and financial engineering. Here we interpret the term ''financial engineering'' broadly enough to cover such topics as financial time series, portfolio analysis, global asset allocation, trading strategy for investment, optimization methods, macro monetary economic analysis and pricing models for various financial assets including derivatives We stress that purely theoretical papers, as well as empirical studies that use Asia-Pacific market data, are welcome. Officially cited as: Asia-Pac Financ Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书