Nanoplastic-induced DNA damage in mammalian cells

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Mohammad Alzaben, Martin Roursgaard, Peter Møller
{"title":"Nanoplastic-induced DNA damage in mammalian cells","authors":"Mohammad Alzaben,&nbsp;Martin Roursgaard,&nbsp;Peter Møller","doi":"10.1016/j.mrgentox.2026.503963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plastic pollution is a growing public health concern. Nanoplastics (NPs) are defined as plastic particles &lt; 1000 nm diameter. Microplastics and NPs have been detected in foods, water, and air. In this mini-review, we assess the genotoxic effects of primary (polystyrene) and secondary (‘true-to-life’) NPs in cultured mammalian cells. Studies were identified in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Narrative review of the literature was supported by statistical analysis of associations between reported genotoxic effects (positive or null effects, or semi-quantitative indicators of effect size) and cell type (immune <em>vs.</em> non-immune cells), genotoxicity endpoint (repairable <em>vs.</em> permanent DNA lesions), maximal exposure concentration, particle size (&gt; the defined size of nanoparticles, 100 nm) and surface modification in polystyrene NP studies. Results from 36 studies show that, as determinants of the effects of polystyrene NPs, biological differences (cell type and genotoxicity endpoint) are more important than the exposure concentration or the particle characteristics (particle size and surface modification). There is higher consistency or stronger effect in studies on immune cells vs. non-immune cells, and some evidence of stronger effect on permanent DNA lesions (mainly micronuclei, MN) vs. repairable damages (mainly, comet assay endpoints). Results from nine studies on true-to-life NPs from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics suggest genotoxic potential, although differences in plastic degradation methods may affect the level of genotoxicity. Overall, the analysis shows that primary (polystyrene) and true-to-life (PET) NPs can generate DNA damage in cultured mammalian cells.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18799,"journal":{"name":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","volume":"915 ","pages":"Article 503963"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571826000471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plastic pollution is a growing public health concern. Nanoplastics (NPs) are defined as plastic particles < 1000 nm diameter. Microplastics and NPs have been detected in foods, water, and air. In this mini-review, we assess the genotoxic effects of primary (polystyrene) and secondary (‘true-to-life’) NPs in cultured mammalian cells. Studies were identified in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Narrative review of the literature was supported by statistical analysis of associations between reported genotoxic effects (positive or null effects, or semi-quantitative indicators of effect size) and cell type (immune vs. non-immune cells), genotoxicity endpoint (repairable vs. permanent DNA lesions), maximal exposure concentration, particle size (> the defined size of nanoparticles, 100 nm) and surface modification in polystyrene NP studies. Results from 36 studies show that, as determinants of the effects of polystyrene NPs, biological differences (cell type and genotoxicity endpoint) are more important than the exposure concentration or the particle characteristics (particle size and surface modification). There is higher consistency or stronger effect in studies on immune cells vs. non-immune cells, and some evidence of stronger effect on permanent DNA lesions (mainly micronuclei, MN) vs. repairable damages (mainly, comet assay endpoints). Results from nine studies on true-to-life NPs from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics suggest genotoxic potential, although differences in plastic degradation methods may affect the level of genotoxicity. Overall, the analysis shows that primary (polystyrene) and true-to-life (PET) NPs can generate DNA damage in cultured mammalian cells.
纳米塑料诱导的哺乳动物细胞DNA损伤
塑料污染是一个日益严重的公共健康问题。纳米塑料(NPs)被定义为直径为<; 1000 纳米的塑料颗粒。在食物、水和空气中都检测到微塑料和NPs。在这篇小型综述中,我们评估了初级(聚苯乙烯)和次级(“真实的”)NPs在培养的哺乳动物细胞中的遗传毒性作用。研究在PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science数据库中被确定。对聚苯乙烯NP研究中报告的遗传毒性效应(阳性或无效效应,或效应大小的半定量指标)与细胞类型(免疫细胞与非免疫细胞)、遗传毒性终点(可修复与永久性DNA损伤)、最大暴露浓度、颗粒大小(纳米颗粒的定义尺寸,100 nm)和表面修饰之间的关联进行统计分析,支持对文献的叙述性回顾。36项研究的结果表明,作为聚苯乙烯NPs效应的决定因素,生物学差异(细胞类型和遗传毒性终点)比暴露浓度或颗粒特性(颗粒大小和表面修饰)更重要。在免疫细胞与非免疫细胞的研究中,有更高的一致性或更强的效果,一些证据表明,对永久性DNA损伤(主要是微核,MN)比可修复损伤(主要是彗星试验终点)的效果更强。尽管塑料降解方法的差异可能会影响遗传毒性水平,但对聚乙烯对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)塑料中真实的NPs进行的九项研究结果表明,NPs可能具有遗传毒性。总的来说,分析表明,原代(聚苯乙烯)和真实的(PET) NPs可以在培养的哺乳动物细胞中产生DNA损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
审稿时长
105 days
期刊介绍: Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (MRGTEM) publishes papers advancing knowledge in the field of genetic toxicology. Papers are welcomed in the following areas: New developments in genotoxicity testing of chemical agents (e.g. improvements in methodology of assay systems and interpretation of results). Alternatives to and refinement of the use of animals in genotoxicity testing. Nano-genotoxicology, the study of genotoxicity hazards and risks related to novel man-made nanomaterials. Studies of epigenetic changes in relation to genotoxic effects. The use of structure-activity relationships in predicting genotoxic effects. The isolation and chemical characterization of novel environmental mutagens. The measurement of genotoxic effects in human populations, when accompanied by quantitative measurements of environmental or occupational exposures. The application of novel technologies for assessing the hazard and risks associated with genotoxic substances (e.g. OMICS or other high-throughput approaches to genotoxicity testing). MRGTEM is now accepting submissions for a new section of the journal: Current Topics in Genotoxicity Testing, that will be dedicated to the discussion of current issues relating to design, interpretation and strategic use of genotoxicity tests. This section is envisaged to include discussions relating to the development of new international testing guidelines, but also to wider topics in the field. The evaluation of contrasting or opposing viewpoints is welcomed as long as the presentation is in accordance with the journal''s aims, scope, and policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书