{"title":"Nanoplastic-induced DNA damage in mammalian cells","authors":"Mohammad Alzaben, Martin Roursgaard, Peter Møller","doi":"10.1016/j.mrgentox.2026.503963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plastic pollution is a growing public health concern. Nanoplastics (NPs) are defined as plastic particles < 1000 nm diameter. Microplastics and NPs have been detected in foods, water, and air. In this mini-review, we assess the genotoxic effects of primary (polystyrene) and secondary (‘true-to-life’) NPs in cultured mammalian cells. Studies were identified in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Narrative review of the literature was supported by statistical analysis of associations between reported genotoxic effects (positive or null effects, or semi-quantitative indicators of effect size) and cell type (immune <em>vs.</em> non-immune cells), genotoxicity endpoint (repairable <em>vs.</em> permanent DNA lesions), maximal exposure concentration, particle size (> the defined size of nanoparticles, 100 nm) and surface modification in polystyrene NP studies. Results from 36 studies show that, as determinants of the effects of polystyrene NPs, biological differences (cell type and genotoxicity endpoint) are more important than the exposure concentration or the particle characteristics (particle size and surface modification). There is higher consistency or stronger effect in studies on immune cells vs. non-immune cells, and some evidence of stronger effect on permanent DNA lesions (mainly micronuclei, MN) vs. repairable damages (mainly, comet assay endpoints). Results from nine studies on true-to-life NPs from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics suggest genotoxic potential, although differences in plastic degradation methods may affect the level of genotoxicity. Overall, the analysis shows that primary (polystyrene) and true-to-life (PET) NPs can generate DNA damage in cultured mammalian cells.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18799,"journal":{"name":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","volume":"915 ","pages":"Article 503963"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571826000471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plastic pollution is a growing public health concern. Nanoplastics (NPs) are defined as plastic particles < 1000 nm diameter. Microplastics and NPs have been detected in foods, water, and air. In this mini-review, we assess the genotoxic effects of primary (polystyrene) and secondary (‘true-to-life’) NPs in cultured mammalian cells. Studies were identified in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Narrative review of the literature was supported by statistical analysis of associations between reported genotoxic effects (positive or null effects, or semi-quantitative indicators of effect size) and cell type (immune vs. non-immune cells), genotoxicity endpoint (repairable vs. permanent DNA lesions), maximal exposure concentration, particle size (> the defined size of nanoparticles, 100 nm) and surface modification in polystyrene NP studies. Results from 36 studies show that, as determinants of the effects of polystyrene NPs, biological differences (cell type and genotoxicity endpoint) are more important than the exposure concentration or the particle characteristics (particle size and surface modification). There is higher consistency or stronger effect in studies on immune cells vs. non-immune cells, and some evidence of stronger effect on permanent DNA lesions (mainly micronuclei, MN) vs. repairable damages (mainly, comet assay endpoints). Results from nine studies on true-to-life NPs from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics suggest genotoxic potential, although differences in plastic degradation methods may affect the level of genotoxicity. Overall, the analysis shows that primary (polystyrene) and true-to-life (PET) NPs can generate DNA damage in cultured mammalian cells.
期刊介绍:
Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (MRGTEM) publishes papers advancing knowledge in the field of genetic toxicology. Papers are welcomed in the following areas:
New developments in genotoxicity testing of chemical agents (e.g. improvements in methodology of assay systems and interpretation of results).
Alternatives to and refinement of the use of animals in genotoxicity testing.
Nano-genotoxicology, the study of genotoxicity hazards and risks related to novel man-made nanomaterials.
Studies of epigenetic changes in relation to genotoxic effects.
The use of structure-activity relationships in predicting genotoxic effects.
The isolation and chemical characterization of novel environmental mutagens.
The measurement of genotoxic effects in human populations, when accompanied by quantitative measurements of environmental or occupational exposures.
The application of novel technologies for assessing the hazard and risks associated with genotoxic substances (e.g. OMICS or other high-throughput approaches to genotoxicity testing).
MRGTEM is now accepting submissions for a new section of the journal: Current Topics in Genotoxicity Testing, that will be dedicated to the discussion of current issues relating to design, interpretation and strategic use of genotoxicity tests. This section is envisaged to include discussions relating to the development of new international testing guidelines, but also to wider topics in the field. The evaluation of contrasting or opposing viewpoints is welcomed as long as the presentation is in accordance with the journal''s aims, scope, and policies.