{"title":"Seeing the whole process: How cooperative process transparency in AR-HMI affects driver cognition in V2V lane changes","authors":"Fang You, Xu Yan, Zhaodong Wang, Qianwen Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2026.103830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) cooperative driving can improve traffic safety and efficiency, but it also introduces information asymmetry between drivers and automated systems, which may lead to human-machine conflict. This study introduces V2V cooperative process transparency, defined as the level of detail with which the interface reveals the Awareness-Negotiation-Execution process of V2V communication to the driver. Using an augmented reality HMI in a driving simulator, we examined how different levels of V2V cooperative process transparency affect driver cognition during cooperative lane changes. Three interface conditions were compared: a baseline condition with no V2V cooperation information, a limited-transparency condition presenting only the final cooperation outcome, and a high-transparency condition presenting the full cooperation process. Twenty-five participants completed the experiment, and subjective, performance, and qualitative data were collected. The results showed that V2V cooperative process transparency significantly affected drivers’ subjective responses. Compared with the baseline condition, both the limited- and high-transparency conditions significantly improved overall situation awareness and reduced workload. The limited-transparency condition also significantly increased trust and system usability, whereas the differences in trust and system usability between the high-transparency and baseline conditions were not significant. Compared with the limited-transparency condition, the high-transparency condition significantly improved overall situation awareness, whereas overall workload, trust, and system usability did not differ significantly; at the workload-dimension level, however, Temporal Demand was significantly lower under high transparency. No significant differences were found in task performance across conditions. Qualitative interviews indicated that most participants considered the richer interface understandable and acceptable, although some reported possible information overload. These findings highlight V2V cooperative process transparency as an important design variable for cooperative driving HMI design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103830"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847826003256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) cooperative driving can improve traffic safety and efficiency, but it also introduces information asymmetry between drivers and automated systems, which may lead to human-machine conflict. This study introduces V2V cooperative process transparency, defined as the level of detail with which the interface reveals the Awareness-Negotiation-Execution process of V2V communication to the driver. Using an augmented reality HMI in a driving simulator, we examined how different levels of V2V cooperative process transparency affect driver cognition during cooperative lane changes. Three interface conditions were compared: a baseline condition with no V2V cooperation information, a limited-transparency condition presenting only the final cooperation outcome, and a high-transparency condition presenting the full cooperation process. Twenty-five participants completed the experiment, and subjective, performance, and qualitative data were collected. The results showed that V2V cooperative process transparency significantly affected drivers’ subjective responses. Compared with the baseline condition, both the limited- and high-transparency conditions significantly improved overall situation awareness and reduced workload. The limited-transparency condition also significantly increased trust and system usability, whereas the differences in trust and system usability between the high-transparency and baseline conditions were not significant. Compared with the limited-transparency condition, the high-transparency condition significantly improved overall situation awareness, whereas overall workload, trust, and system usability did not differ significantly; at the workload-dimension level, however, Temporal Demand was significantly lower under high transparency. No significant differences were found in task performance across conditions. Qualitative interviews indicated that most participants considered the richer interface understandable and acceptable, although some reported possible information overload. These findings highlight V2V cooperative process transparency as an important design variable for cooperative driving HMI design.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.