Seeing the whole process: How cooperative process transparency in AR-HMI affects driver cognition in V2V lane changes

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Fang You, Xu Yan, Zhaodong Wang, Qianwen Fu
{"title":"Seeing the whole process: How cooperative process transparency in AR-HMI affects driver cognition in V2V lane changes","authors":"Fang You,&nbsp;Xu Yan,&nbsp;Zhaodong Wang,&nbsp;Qianwen Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2026.103830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) cooperative driving can improve traffic safety and efficiency, but it also introduces information asymmetry between drivers and automated systems, which may lead to human-machine conflict. This study introduces V2V cooperative process transparency, defined as the level of detail with which the interface reveals the Awareness-Negotiation-Execution process of V2V communication to the driver. Using an augmented reality HMI in a driving simulator, we examined how different levels of V2V cooperative process transparency affect driver cognition during cooperative lane changes. Three interface conditions were compared: a baseline condition with no V2V cooperation information, a limited-transparency condition presenting only the final cooperation outcome, and a high-transparency condition presenting the full cooperation process. Twenty-five participants completed the experiment, and subjective, performance, and qualitative data were collected. The results showed that V2V cooperative process transparency significantly affected drivers’ subjective responses. Compared with the baseline condition, both the limited- and high-transparency conditions significantly improved overall situation awareness and reduced workload. The limited-transparency condition also significantly increased trust and system usability, whereas the differences in trust and system usability between the high-transparency and baseline conditions were not significant. Compared with the limited-transparency condition, the high-transparency condition significantly improved overall situation awareness, whereas overall workload, trust, and system usability did not differ significantly; at the workload-dimension level, however, Temporal Demand was significantly lower under high transparency. No significant differences were found in task performance across conditions. Qualitative interviews indicated that most participants considered the richer interface understandable and acceptable, although some reported possible information overload. These findings highlight V2V cooperative process transparency as an important design variable for cooperative driving HMI design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 103830"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847826003256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) cooperative driving can improve traffic safety and efficiency, but it also introduces information asymmetry between drivers and automated systems, which may lead to human-machine conflict. This study introduces V2V cooperative process transparency, defined as the level of detail with which the interface reveals the Awareness-Negotiation-Execution process of V2V communication to the driver. Using an augmented reality HMI in a driving simulator, we examined how different levels of V2V cooperative process transparency affect driver cognition during cooperative lane changes. Three interface conditions were compared: a baseline condition with no V2V cooperation information, a limited-transparency condition presenting only the final cooperation outcome, and a high-transparency condition presenting the full cooperation process. Twenty-five participants completed the experiment, and subjective, performance, and qualitative data were collected. The results showed that V2V cooperative process transparency significantly affected drivers’ subjective responses. Compared with the baseline condition, both the limited- and high-transparency conditions significantly improved overall situation awareness and reduced workload. The limited-transparency condition also significantly increased trust and system usability, whereas the differences in trust and system usability between the high-transparency and baseline conditions were not significant. Compared with the limited-transparency condition, the high-transparency condition significantly improved overall situation awareness, whereas overall workload, trust, and system usability did not differ significantly; at the workload-dimension level, however, Temporal Demand was significantly lower under high transparency. No significant differences were found in task performance across conditions. Qualitative interviews indicated that most participants considered the richer interface understandable and acceptable, although some reported possible information overload. These findings highlight V2V cooperative process transparency as an important design variable for cooperative driving HMI design.
全程观摩:AR-HMI协同过程透明度如何影响V2V变道过程中驾驶员认知
车对车(V2V)协同驾驶可以提高交通安全性和效率,但它也引入了驾驶员和自动化系统之间的信息不对称,这可能导致人机冲突。本研究引入了V2V合作过程透明度,定义为接口向驾驶员揭示V2V通信的感知-协商-执行过程的详细程度。在驾驶模拟器中使用增强现实HMI,我们研究了不同水平的V2V合作过程透明度如何影响驾驶员在合作变道过程中的认知。比较了三种接口条件:没有V2V合作信息的基线条件、只显示最终合作结果的有限透明度条件和显示整个合作过程的高透明度条件。25名参与者完成了实验,并收集了主观、行为和定性数据。结果表明,V2V合作过程透明度显著影响驾驶员的主观反应。与基线条件相比,有限透明度和高透明度条件都显著提高了整体态势感知并减少了工作量。有限透明度条件也显著提高了信任和系统可用性,而高透明度条件与基线条件在信任和系统可用性方面的差异不显著。与有限透明度条件相比,高透明度条件显著提高了整体态势感知,而总体工作量、信任和系统可用性差异不显著;然而,在工作负荷维度水平上,在高透明度下,时间需求显著降低。不同条件下的任务表现没有显著差异。定性访谈表明,大多数参与者认为更丰富的界面可以理解和接受,尽管一些人报告可能的信息过载。这些发现突出了V2V合作过程透明度是协同驱动HMI设计的重要设计变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书