Erased photos, surviving faces: On-device AI residue as a new class of digital evidence in Samsung Gallery

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ChaeMin Park, JuHwan Park, Dohyun Kim
{"title":"Erased photos, surviving faces: On-device AI residue as a new class of digital evidence in Samsung Gallery","authors":"ChaeMin Park,&nbsp;JuHwan Park,&nbsp;Dohyun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.fsidi.2026.302183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional digital forensics analyzes artifacts that directly record user actions, such as logs and application databases. As on-device AI becomes common, however, <em>AI residue</em> — data derived from user content, such as facial feature vectors — can also serve as digital evidence. Using the people-tag feature of Samsung Gallery as a case study, this paper reverse-engineers the on-device face-clustering pipeline (static analysis with Ghidra, dynamic analysis with Frida) and quantitatively evaluates the forensic value and persistence of the resulting residue, with four contributions. (i) We document the pipeline from face detection to GCN clustering, including five decision thresholds and the extraction-failure boundary (|<em>pose</em>|≥ 38°), and release an open-source tool that reproduces it; tool- and device-generated vectors match at mean cosine 0.9512(<em>N</em> = 2, 440). (ii) With external reference images, the tool identifies registered persons at TPR 95.62% and detects permanently deleted persons at 95.67%. (iii) To our knowledge, this is the first quantification of how long deleted vectors persist in <span>face_data</span>: block reuse is deterministic (smallest-unreferenced-first, 100% predicted-vs-observed match), giving survival of <em>T</em><sub>90</sub> = 83 and <em>T</em><sub>50</sub> = 385 newly registered faces. (iv) Eight differential-residue rules distinguish normal use from intentional concealment (<em>F</em>1 = 1.0), and person data is redundantly stored in the system-protected <span>media.db</span>, auto-restoring after user-level app-data deletion. These findings establish AI residue as a distinct class of digital evidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48481,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 302183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Digital Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266628172600140X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional digital forensics analyzes artifacts that directly record user actions, such as logs and application databases. As on-device AI becomes common, however, AI residue — data derived from user content, such as facial feature vectors — can also serve as digital evidence. Using the people-tag feature of Samsung Gallery as a case study, this paper reverse-engineers the on-device face-clustering pipeline (static analysis with Ghidra, dynamic analysis with Frida) and quantitatively evaluates the forensic value and persistence of the resulting residue, with four contributions. (i) We document the pipeline from face detection to GCN clustering, including five decision thresholds and the extraction-failure boundary (|pose|≥ 38°), and release an open-source tool that reproduces it; tool- and device-generated vectors match at mean cosine 0.9512(N = 2, 440). (ii) With external reference images, the tool identifies registered persons at TPR 95.62% and detects permanently deleted persons at 95.67%. (iii) To our knowledge, this is the first quantification of how long deleted vectors persist in face_data: block reuse is deterministic (smallest-unreferenced-first, 100% predicted-vs-observed match), giving survival of T90 = 83 and T50 = 385 newly registered faces. (iv) Eight differential-residue rules distinguish normal use from intentional concealment (F1 = 1.0), and person data is redundantly stored in the system-protected media.db, auto-restoring after user-level app-data deletion. These findings establish AI residue as a distinct class of digital evidence.
删除的照片,幸存的面孔:设备上的人工智能残留物作为一种新的数字证据在三星画廊
传统的数字取证分析直接记录用户操作的工件,例如日志和应用程序数据库。然而,随着设备上的人工智能变得普遍,人工智能残留物——来自用户内容的数据,如面部特征向量——也可以作为数字证据。本文以Samsung Gallery的人物标签特征为例,对设备上的人脸聚类管道进行了逆向工程(使用Ghidra进行静态分析,使用Frida进行动态分析),并定量评估了所得残留物的法医价值和持久性。(i)我们记录了从人脸检测到GCN聚类的过程,包括五个决策阈值和提取失败边界(|构成|≥38°),并发布了一个开源工具来复制它;工具和设备生成的向量匹配于平均余弦0.9512(N = 2,440)。(ii)使用外部参考图像,该工具识别注册人员的TPR为95.62%,检测永久删除人员的TPR为95.67%。(iii)据我们所知,这是第一次量化删除向量在face_data中持续多长时间:块重用是确定性的(最小未引用优先,100%预测vs观察匹配),给出T90 = 83和T50 = 385新注册的面孔的存活率。(iv) 8个差异残留规则区分了正常使用和故意隐藏(F1 = 1.0),个人数据冗余存储在系统保护的media.db中,在用户级应用程序数据删除后自动恢复。这些发现将人工智能残留物确立为一类独特的数字证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书