Central Blockade of Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 Receptors Increases Force Generation in Reserpine-Treated Mice, but Only CB1 Blockade Extends the Duration of Effort
Beatriz Carminati dos Santos, Izabely Guedes da Rosa, Laíze de Freitas Mazzardo, Naiara de Souza Santos, Izabel Feltrin Fabro, Tatyana Nery, Amanda Leite Bastos Pereira, Aderbal S. Aguiar Jr
{"title":"Central Blockade of Cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 Receptors Increases Force Generation in Reserpine-Treated Mice, but Only CB1 Blockade Extends the Duration of Effort","authors":"Beatriz Carminati dos Santos, Izabely Guedes da Rosa, Laíze de Freitas Mazzardo, Naiara de Souza Santos, Izabel Feltrin Fabro, Tatyana Nery, Amanda Leite Bastos Pereira, Aderbal S. Aguiar Jr","doi":"10.1021/acsptsci.6c00206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Motor impairment\r\nin parkinsonism extends beyond the classical triad\r\nto weakness and a reduced capacity to sustain motor output, whose\r\nneuromodulatory control is poorly resolved. The endocannabinoid system\r\nis a candidate regulator, but CB1 and CB2 receptors have not been\r\nseparated within one preparation. Reserpine-treated adult female Swiss\r\nmice received vehicle, the CB1 antagonist AM251, or the CB2 antagonist\r\nAM630 into the lateral ventricle; catalepsy was recorded across three\r\ntrials and neuromuscular performance in a grip force task. Both antagonists\r\nincreased the force generated at task onset, by amounts these data\r\ncannot distinguish: AM630 by 53.9 gf (95% CI 22.5–85.3) and\r\nAM251 by 41.2 gf (95% CI 8.8–73.6). They separated on duration.\r\nAM251 increased grip time by 619 ms (95% CI 113–1125), whereas\r\nAM630 did not (−70 ms, 95% CI −560 to +421). An interaction\r\ncontrast on the force–time balance followed from that difference:\r\nAM630 shifted the balance toward force (−2.03 SD, <em>P</em> = 0.008), AM251 did not (−0.36 SD, <em>P</em> = 0.66),\r\nand the two differed from each other by 1.67 SD (<em>P</em> = 0.022). AM251 also reduced the odds of a cataleptic response (OR\r\n0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.89). Adjusting for body mass left both\r\nforce effects unchanged. The dissociation is therefore in the duration\r\nof effort rather than in its force: both antagonists raise force,\r\nand only CB1 blockade also extends the time over which it is maintained.\r\nDelivered intracerebroventricularly, these effects are central in\r\norigin but not anatomically localized.</p>","PeriodicalId":36426,"journal":{"name":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","volume":"9 10","pages":"2783–2794"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Pharmacology and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsptsci.6c00206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Motor impairment
in parkinsonism extends beyond the classical triad
to weakness and a reduced capacity to sustain motor output, whose
neuromodulatory control is poorly resolved. The endocannabinoid system
is a candidate regulator, but CB1 and CB2 receptors have not been
separated within one preparation. Reserpine-treated adult female Swiss
mice received vehicle, the CB1 antagonist AM251, or the CB2 antagonist
AM630 into the lateral ventricle; catalepsy was recorded across three
trials and neuromuscular performance in a grip force task. Both antagonists
increased the force generated at task onset, by amounts these data
cannot distinguish: AM630 by 53.9 gf (95% CI 22.5–85.3) and
AM251 by 41.2 gf (95% CI 8.8–73.6). They separated on duration.
AM251 increased grip time by 619 ms (95% CI 113–1125), whereas
AM630 did not (−70 ms, 95% CI −560 to +421). An interaction
contrast on the force–time balance followed from that difference:
AM630 shifted the balance toward force (−2.03 SD, P = 0.008), AM251 did not (−0.36 SD, P = 0.66),
and the two differed from each other by 1.67 SD (P = 0.022). AM251 also reduced the odds of a cataleptic response (OR
0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.89). Adjusting for body mass left both
force effects unchanged. The dissociation is therefore in the duration
of effort rather than in its force: both antagonists raise force,
and only CB1 blockade also extends the time over which it is maintained.
Delivered intracerebroventricularly, these effects are central in
origin but not anatomically localized.
帕金森氏症的运动障碍超出了经典的三联性虚弱和维持运动输出的能力下降,其神经调节控制问题得不到解决。内源性大麻素系统是一种候选调节剂,但CB1和CB2受体尚未在一种制剂中分离。利血平治疗的成年雌性瑞士鼠接受CB1拮抗剂AM251或CB2拮抗剂am630进入侧脑室;在三个实验中记录了癫痫和握力任务中的神经肌肉表现。两种拮抗剂都增加了任务开始时产生的力,其数量无法区分:AM630增加53.9 gf (95% CI 22.5-85.3), am251增加41.2 gf (95% CI 8.8-73.6)。他们在时间上分开了。AM251增加了619 ms (95% CI 113-1125),而am630没有(- 70 ms, 95% CI - 560至+421)。在力-时间平衡方面,AM630使平衡偏向力(- 2.03 SD, P = 0.008), AM251没有(- 0.36 SD, P = 0.66),两者相差1.67 SD (P = 0.022)。AM251也降低了过敏反应的几率(OR0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.89)。调整身体质量后,两种力的效果不变。因此,解离是在努力的持续时间而不是它的力量:两种拮抗剂都提高了力,只有CB1阻断也延长了它维持的时间。脑室内传递,这些影响是中心起源的,但不是解剖局部的。
期刊介绍:
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science publishes high quality, innovative, and impactful research across the broad spectrum of biological sciences, covering basic and molecular sciences through to translational preclinical studies. Clinical studies that address novel mechanisms of action, and methodological papers that provide innovation, and advance translation, will also be considered. We give priority to studies that fully integrate basic pharmacological and/or biochemical findings into physiological processes that have translational potential in a broad range of biomedical disciplines. Therefore, studies that employ a complementary blend of in vitro and in vivo systems are of particular interest to the journal. Nonetheless, all innovative and impactful research that has an articulated translational relevance will be considered.
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science does not publish research on biological extracts that have unknown concentration or unknown chemical composition.
Authors are encouraged to use the pre-submission inquiry mechanism to ensure relevance and appropriateness of research.