Improved Measurement of Extractable Organic Fluorine in Biosolids and Compost and Its Implications for Fluorine Speciation

IF 4.5 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
ACS ES&T water Pub Date : 2026-10-09 Epub Date: 2026-09-02 DOI:10.1021/acsestwater.6c00294
Hafiz M. Abd-ur-Rehman, Wayne J. Parker, Anh Le-Tuan Pham
{"title":"Improved Measurement of Extractable Organic Fluorine in Biosolids and Compost and Its Implications for Fluorine Speciation","authors":"Hafiz M. Abd-ur-Rehman,&nbsp;Wayne J. Parker,&nbsp;Anh Le-Tuan Pham","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.6c00294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extractable organic fluorine (EOF)\r\nanalysis is increasingly\r\nused\r\nto quantify organic fluorine (OF) not captured by targeted liquid\r\nchromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS),\r\nyet method standardization and quality assurance remain unresolved\r\nfor solids, where isolating low OF from much larger inorganic fluorine\r\n(IF) is analytically challenging. Here, an enhanced EOF method was\r\ndeveloped and validated for biosolids and compost to selectively isolate\r\nanionic OF while minimizing IF carryover. Methanolic extraction alone\r\ncoextracted substantial IF (22–35%), whereas incorporating\r\na 0.1% aqueous ammonium hydroxide wash into a modified weak anion-exchange\r\nsolid-phase extraction protocol reduced IF to below the limit of quantification\r\n(&lt;0.056 μg g<sup>–1</sup>) while maintaining good\r\nOF recoveries (79–101%). Application of the validated method\r\nshowed that EOF represented 0.24–0.69% of total fluorine, indicating\r\nthat most fluorine was inorganic and/or nonextractable. Fluorine from\r\ntargeted per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) accounted for\r\n4.3–46% of EOF, suggesting that targeted PFAS explained only\r\na subset of EOF. The improved quality-assured workflow provides more\r\nreliable EOF measurements for screening-level fluorine speciation\r\nand mass-balance evaluation, while emphasizing that EOF remains a\r\nmethod-defined metric and should not be interpreted as a stand-alone\r\nmeasure of PFAS burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"6 10","pages":"6282–6291"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.6c00294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extractable organic fluorine (EOF) analysis is increasingly used to quantify organic fluorine (OF) not captured by targeted liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS), yet method standardization and quality assurance remain unresolved for solids, where isolating low OF from much larger inorganic fluorine (IF) is analytically challenging. Here, an enhanced EOF method was developed and validated for biosolids and compost to selectively isolate anionic OF while minimizing IF carryover. Methanolic extraction alone coextracted substantial IF (22–35%), whereas incorporating a 0.1% aqueous ammonium hydroxide wash into a modified weak anion-exchange solid-phase extraction protocol reduced IF to below the limit of quantification (<0.056 μg g–1) while maintaining good OF recoveries (79–101%). Application of the validated method showed that EOF represented 0.24–0.69% of total fluorine, indicating that most fluorine was inorganic and/or nonextractable. Fluorine from targeted per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) accounted for 4.3–46% of EOF, suggesting that targeted PFAS explained only a subset of EOF. The improved quality-assured workflow provides more reliable EOF measurements for screening-level fluorine speciation and mass-balance evaluation, while emphasizing that EOF remains a method-defined metric and should not be interpreted as a stand-alone measure of PFAS burden.

生物固体和堆肥中可提取有机氟的改进测量及其对氟形态的影响
可提取有机氟(EOF)分析越来越多地用于定量有机氟(OF),而不是通过靶向液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS /MS)捕获,但方法标准化和质量保证仍然无法解决固体,从更大的无机氟(IF)中分离低的有机氟(EOF)在分析上具有挑战性。本研究开发并验证了一种增强的EOF方法,用于生物固体和堆肥,以选择性地分离阴离子OF,同时最大限度地减少IF的携带。单独甲醇萃取可提取大量的IF(22-35%),而在改良的弱阴离子交换固相萃取方案中加入0.1%的氢氧化铵洗涤水溶液,可将IF降低到定量限制(0.056 μg - 1)以下,同时保持良好的of回收率(79-101%)。经验证的方法的应用表明,EOF占总氟的0.24-0.69%,表明大多数氟是无机的和/或不可提取的。来自目标全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的氟占EOF的4.3 - 46%,这表明目标PFAS仅解释了EOF的一部分。改进的质量保证工作流程为筛选水平的氟形态和质量平衡评估提供了更可靠的EOF测量,同时强调EOF仍然是方法定义的度量,不应被解释为PFAS负担的单独测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书