Operationalizing Nitrogen Compliance: A Leakage-Safe, Alarm-Budget Framework for Wastewater Treatment Early Warning

IF 4.5 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
ACS ES&T water Pub Date : 2026-10-09 Epub Date: 2026-09-23 DOI:10.1021/acsestwater.6c00549
Alireza Mahvelati Shamsabadi, Morteza Mahvelatishamsabadi, Jinwoo Kim, Shokouh Masoumilari, Tejas Ravi Atri, Minwoo Park, Sudong Lee, Daeseung Kyung
{"title":"Operationalizing Nitrogen Compliance: A Leakage-Safe, Alarm-Budget Framework for Wastewater Treatment Early Warning","authors":"Alireza Mahvelati Shamsabadi,&nbsp;Morteza Mahvelatishamsabadi,&nbsp;Jinwoo Kim,&nbsp;Shokouh Masoumilari,&nbsp;Tejas Ravi Atri,&nbsp;Minwoo Park,&nbsp;Sudong Lee,&nbsp;Daeseung Kyung","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.6c00549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We developed a leakage-safe, alarm-budget\r\nframework for early warning\r\nof effluent total nitrogen (TN<sub>out</sub>) in a municipal wastewater\r\ntreatment plant (WWTP) using multiyear daily records from Ulsan, Republic\r\nof Korea. The framework combined strict temporal feature construction,\r\ntrain-only preprocessing, horizon-specific target-date purging, and\r\nblocked chronological validation at 1-, 3-, and 5 day lead times.\r\nModels were evaluated by point-forecast error; at the 5 day lead,\r\nmodels were additionally assessed under nominal 5% and 10% alarm budgets\r\nthat prioritized the highest-risk days for review at thresholds of\r\n15–17 mg L<sup>–1</sup>. No single point model dominated\r\nacross horizons: the lowest pooled mean absolute error (MAE) was 1.546\r\nmg L<sup>–1</sup> at 1 day for Persistence, 1.764 mg L<sup>–1</sup> at 3 days for HistGradientBoostingRegressor (HGBR),\r\nand 1.773 mg L<sup>–1</sup> at 5 days for Ridge. At the 5 day\r\nlead and a threshold of 16 mg L<sup>–1</sup>, retrospective\r\nfold-local ranking captured 18.3% and 31.0% of exceedances at nominal\r\n5% and 10% alarm budgets, corresponding to approximately 3.5- and\r\n3.1-fold enrichment over random ranking. A fixed rank ensemble remained\r\ncompetitive but did not dominate all operating points. These results\r\nshow that compliance-oriented wastewater early warning models should\r\nbe evaluated jointly for temporal validity, forecast accuracy, and\r\nbounded-attention decision utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":93847,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T water","volume":"6 10","pages":"6410–6421"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.6c00549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We developed a leakage-safe, alarm-budget framework for early warning of effluent total nitrogen (TNout) in a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) using multiyear daily records from Ulsan, Republic of Korea. The framework combined strict temporal feature construction, train-only preprocessing, horizon-specific target-date purging, and blocked chronological validation at 1-, 3-, and 5 day lead times. Models were evaluated by point-forecast error; at the 5 day lead, models were additionally assessed under nominal 5% and 10% alarm budgets that prioritized the highest-risk days for review at thresholds of 15–17 mg L–1. No single point model dominated across horizons: the lowest pooled mean absolute error (MAE) was 1.546 mg L–1 at 1 day for Persistence, 1.764 mg L–1 at 3 days for HistGradientBoostingRegressor (HGBR), and 1.773 mg L–1 at 5 days for Ridge. At the 5 day lead and a threshold of 16 mg L–1, retrospective fold-local ranking captured 18.3% and 31.0% of exceedances at nominal 5% and 10% alarm budgets, corresponding to approximately 3.5- and 3.1-fold enrichment over random ranking. A fixed rank ensemble remained competitive but did not dominate all operating points. These results show that compliance-oriented wastewater early warning models should be evaluated jointly for temporal validity, forecast accuracy, and bounded-attention decision utility.

实施氮合规性:一个泄漏安全的警报预算框架,用于废水处理早期预警
我们利用韩国蔚山市的多年日记录,开发了一个泄漏安全警报预算框架,用于对城市污水处理厂(WWTP)的流出总氮(TNout)进行早期预警。该框架结合了严格的时间特征构建、仅限训练的预处理、特定水平的目标日期清除,以及1天、3天和5天提前期的阻塞时间验证。采用点预测误差对模型进行评价;在5天前,根据5%和10%的报警预算对模型进行额外评估,在15 - 17 mg L-1的阈值下优先审查风险最高的日子。没有单点模型在各个水平上占主导地位:Persistence在1天内的最低平均绝对误差(MAE)为1.546mg L-1, HistGradientBoostingRegressor (HGBR)在3天内的最低平均绝对误差为1.764 mg L-1, Ridge在5天内的最低平均绝对误差为1.773 mg L-1。在超前5天,阈值为16 mg L-1时,在5%和10%的报警预算下,回顾性分组分组分别捕获了18.3%和31.0%的超标,相当于比随机分组分别增加了3.5倍和3.1倍。固定等级的集合仍然具有竞争力,但并没有控制所有的操作点。这些结果表明,应综合评价以合规为导向的废水预警模型的时间有效性、预测准确性和有界关注决策效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书